Newsletter Subject

Morning Distribution for Thursday, March 7, 2024

From

fivethirtyeight.com

Email Address

newsletter@fivethirtyeight.com

Sent On

Thu, Mar 7, 2024 01:20 PM

Email Preheader Text

Morning Distribution Thursday, March, 07, 2024 Your daily briefing from FiveThirtyEight ------------

[FiveThirtyEight]( Morning Distribution Thursday, March, 07, 2024 Your daily briefing from FiveThirtyEight --------------------------------------------------------------- The Morning Story [Biden’s State of the Union address won’t make or break his campaign]( [Biden’s State of the Union address won’t make or break his campaign]( By [Nathaniel Rakich](/author/nathaniel_rakich) Imagine giving a speech in front of an audience of tens of millions of people. Then imagine that your political future depends on it. On Thursday night, President Joe Biden will take the speaker’s dais and deliver his third State of the Union address at a pivotal moment for him. His [average approval rating]( is just 38.1 percent, one of the lowest points of his presidency. Many swing voters who supported him in 2020 now appear to be leaning toward former President Donald Trump, who leads in [early polls of the November general election](. And 73 percent of registered voters in a recent [New York Times/Siena College poll]( thought he was too old to be an effective president. In theory, the State of the Union is a golden opportunity for Biden to turn some of those numbers around — a chance to make the case for his policies, and (obliquely) his reelection, and to rebut fears about his age with a forceful feat of oratory. Or, if you’re a pessimistic Democrat, it’s a chance for Biden’s weaknesses to be put under the microscope: If he gives a lackluster performance or misspeaks, it could reinforce the concerns voters have about him. But fortunately or unfortunately for Biden, in reality, his political future probably does not depend on Thursday’s speech. The State of the Union may be a chance for the president to directly address the American people, an occasion of great pomp and circumstance and an important democratic tradition, but one thing it hasn’t been over the years is a political game-changer. I went back and took a look at 538’s [historical presidential approval averages]( and I found that, historically, State of the Union addresses have not led to a significant change in presidents’ approval ratings. Since 1978, presidents’ approval ratings have shifted by an average of only 1.9 percentage points in the two weeks after their annual addresses to Congress. And that’s 1.9 points in either direction! Since 1978, the president’s approval rating has actually gone down after his address almost as many times (19) as it has gone up (21). Accounting for that, presidents since 1978 have gotten an average approval-rating boost of just 0.3 points after their big speeches. State of the Unions don’t make presidents more popular Presidents’ average approval ratings on the day of their annual addresses to Congress versus two weeks later, since 1978 Approval rating Year President Day of speech 2 weeks after Change 1978 Jimmy Carter 55.0% 52.1% -2.9 1979 Jimmy Carter 43.3 41.5 -1.8 1980 Jimmy Carter 57.0 58.8 +1.9 1981 Ronald Reagan 54.0 54.0 +0.0 1982 Ronald Reagan 47.2 46.9 -0.4 1983 Ronald Reagan 36.8 35.3 -1.5 1984 Ronald Reagan 52.0 54.4 +2.4 1985 Ronald Reagan 64.1 60.2 -3.9 1986 Ronald Reagan 64.0 64.0 +0.0 1987 Ronald Reagan 48.9 48.9 +0.0 1988 Ronald Reagan 49.8 49.4 -0.4 1990 George H.W. Bush 78.3 73.3 -5.0 1991 George H.W. Bush 82.7 77.6 -5.0 1992 George H.W. Bush 44.6 43.4 -1.2 1993 Bill Clinton 51.8 60.1 +8.3 1994 Bill Clinton 55.7 56.3 +0.6 1995 Bill Clinton 46.3 49.5 +3.2 1996 Bill Clinton 48.4 48.4 +0.0 1997 Bill Clinton 62.1 62.1 +0.0 1998 Bill Clinton 57.8 68.1 +10.3 1999 Bill Clinton 65.9 65.0 -1.0 2000 Bill Clinton 61.7 61.7 -0.1 2001 George W. Bush 55.7 56.7 +1.0 2002 George W. Bush 80.0 78.3 -1.7 2003 George W. Bush 56.0 59.9 +3.9 2004 George W. Bush 53.4 49.6 -3.8 2005 George W. Bush 49.1 49.8 +0.7 2006 George W. Bush 40.8 40.9 +0.2 2007 George W. Bush 32.3 33.4 +1.1 2008 George W. Bush 32.7 31.0 -1.7 2009 Barack Obama 62.9 60.8 -2.2 2010 Barack Obama 48.8 48.1 -0.6 2011 Barack Obama 50.3 48.5 -1.8 2012 Barack Obama 45.1 47.7 +2.6 2013 Barack Obama 50.8 50.9 +0.2 2014 Barack Obama 43.6 43.3 -0.3 2015 Barack Obama 45.1 47.2 +2.1 2016 Barack Obama 44.8 46.9 +2.1 2017 Donald Trump 42.9 44.3 +1.4 2018 Donald Trump 39.0 41.0 +2.0 2019 Donald Trump 39.9 41.9 +2.0 2020 Donald Trump 43.5 44.6 +1.1 2021 Joe Biden 54.3 53.5 -0.8 2022 Joe Biden 41.6 42.0 +0.4 2023 Joe Biden 42.0 42.6 +0.6 Average +0.3 There were not enough polls to calculate an average around the time of the 1989 speech. Sources: Polls, American Presidency Project Part of the reason why State of the Union addresses don’t seem to affect presidents’ approval ratings is probably that they’re preaching to the choir. Most years, CNN* conducts a poll of State of the Union viewers shortly after the speech, and those viewers tend to disproportionately be of the same political party as the president. For example, last year, 41 percent of [CNN’s sample]( were Democrats, while only 31 percent were Republicans and 28 percent were independents or members of another party. Not every political event has to affect public opinion in order to matter, of course. The State of the Union is first and foremost a governing ritual: Traditionally, the speeches are a laundry list of policy proposals that the president would like Congress to pass. The only problem is, the speech doesn’t usually inspire much lawmaking either. For years, [political scientists Donna R. Hoffman and Alison D. Howard]( have [logged every request presidents have made]( in their annual addresses to Congress.** Since 1965, only 24 percent of those requests were fully enacted, and another 13 percent were partially enacted. That’s a 63 percent failure rate. (Of course, in presidents’ defense, you don’t get anything unless you ask!) Biden’s up against two extra challenges in this regard: Congress is under divided government, and it’s a presidential election year. As we saw with a [recent border-security bill]( Republicans are unlikely to allow the passage of any major legislation this year that Biden can chalk up as a win. Indeed, in the last two presidential election years (2016 and 2020), exactly zero of the president’s State of the Union requests became law. However, the president also didn’t make that many requests in the first place; in 2016, President Barack Obama made only five, while Trump made only 12 in 2020. In both cases, that was significantly fewer requests than in their previous State of the Union addresses. This might have been a tacit admission that nothing was probably going to get done anyway, moving them to deliver a decidedly un-State of the Union-y State of the Union. It will be interesting if Biden follows suit and gives what is essentially a campaign speech instead. But again, if he takes that tack, he shouldn’t expect it to matter. For better or worse, Biden’s political future doesn’t depend on Thursday’s speech. So perhaps he can just picture all of Congress in their underwear and relax. Footnotes *In conjunction with Gallup and USA Today from 1992 through 2006, with ORC International from 2007 through 2017 and with SSRS since 2018. **This includes State of the Union addresses plus the speeches before a joint session of Congress that new presidents give shortly after being sworn in (which aren’t [officially considered State of the Union addresses](. [Read more]( [FiveThirtyEight] [View in browser]( [ABC News]( [Unsubscribe](

Marketing emails from fivethirtyeight.com

View More
Sent On

30/05/2024

Sent On

30/05/2024

Sent On

29/05/2024

Sent On

24/05/2024

Sent On

23/05/2024

Sent On

23/05/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.