Newsletter Subject

No, Private Marketplaces Aren’t Going Anywhere

From

accessintel.com

Email Address

eletters@email.adexchanger.com

Sent On

Tue, Mar 12, 2019 05:01 PM

Email Preheader Text

” is a column written for the sell side of the digital media community. Today’s column is

[AdExchanger | The Sell Sider] “[The Sell Sider](” is a column written for the sell side of the digital media community. Today’s column is written by Dillon Roulet, founder and managing partner at [Duplici](. The effects of a matured ecosystem are clear: Open marketplace media buys are much more secure and transparent than they were in the early days. We’re a few months into the new year and preparing to say goodbye to private auctions. Seems to be the talk of the town. But within this chatter, I’ve noticed a concerning game of telephone at play. The term private auction is being confused with private marketplace. Let’s be clear: Private marketplaces (PMPs) are far from being in decline or diminished in importance. These sell-side marketplaces have spent years cultivating relationships with communities of specialty media, most of which don’t sell inventory on the open exchange. They were initially conceived as collectives between agencies and publishers, but have evolved to become much more influential with the publishing communities they serve. They now stand as the gateway for marketers looking to tap into the power of unique, highly contextual media audiences and show no signs of going anywhere but up. Private marketplace vs. private auction Private marketplace is not a general label for any media buying or selling outside of the normal parameters of the open exchange. Open RTB and private auctions should not be confused with opportunities for specialized, supply-side-created marketplaces/networks or programmatic direct. I’ve heard buyers commonly ask publishers for a private marketplace when the intent is simply a programmatic-direct engagement. They’re essentially only using the programmatic pipes for campaign activation with fixed pricing and guaranteed budget. Programmatic-direct campaigns are completely different than private auctions, where a buyer intends to activate with carefully selected publisher relationships and individual impressions. On the other hand, private marketplaces are collectives of media brands with common contextual environments and quality standards, usually managed by an independent ad network or committee. Demand for these PMPs is often driven independent of the publisher sales. PMPs’ primary task is to provide high quality, exclusive inventory for buyers, while maintaining higher CPMs and campaign safety for the publishers they serve. For many small publishers, the open market is not an option Most small publishers still get beat up on the open market. That’s why they’ve turned to trusted private exchanges that have helped solve their primary challenge of scalability. After the dot-com boom, large publishers were offering digital inventory via DoubleClick, Right Media, 24/7 and other open networks, but the niche media community faced a historic dilemma: plug into an open ecosystem focused more on scalability than quality, or minimize digital exposure and continue to support a still-profitable circulation business. As we now know, many chose the latter. Unfortunately, by the mid to late 2000s, the publishers that were left standing were clinging for dear life. That’s where the value of private marketplaces came into play. The ad networks that facilitated the first PMPs offered struggling publishers not just the ability to catch up with digital transformation, but the chance to jump one step further into the industry’s newest, most efficient strategy: programmatic. Of course, this was almost a decade ago. Times have changed and needs have shifted. The role of PMPs has continued to expand This small community of private ad networks gradually evolved into the private marketplaces in place today. But they’re also continuing to expand their role with the publishers they serve. They’ve become holistic advisors to the entirety of their publishers’ digital and tech strategies. And because of this role, they frequently act as the gatekeeper to all ad ops, data and supply chain initiatives their members adopt. It’s important to also note that the size of these networks can be deceiving. A member publisher may only generate on average between 1 million and 2 million monthly impressions. Yet it wouldn’t be unusual for the respective PMP to collectively offer scalability of more than 100 million monthly impressions. They can swing a surprisingly big stick when it comes to reach. Private deals post-cookie expiration PMPs also can offer buyers opportunity in a world without cookies or universal ad IDs. It’s likely that CPMs on the open market will take a nose dive if the cookie retires before we can onboard a viable universal ID (don’t hold your breath). Publishers of all sizes should be shaking in their boots. And once CPMs start to drop, those dependent on open exchanges will be scrambling for new alternative revenue streams. This is great news for PMPs, as it’s likely that an influx of publishers will seek to wall up their inventory as fast as possible to maintain premium pricing. Furthermore, it’s likely that existing private auctions will weather the storm with minimal economic impact. In this scenario, buyers and agencies will have little choice but to continue to use private deals. The gatekeepers of first-party data Powering intelligent media buys post-cookie is going to demand high quality first-party data. As I mentioned, many private exchanges evolved to manage a majority scope of their members’ digital strategy. This includes their additional role as trusted data custodian. It’s quite common, particularly in B2B media networks, for PMPs to influence or outright manage the entire supply chain connecting their publishers’ data to the exchange. Furthermore, AI-powered customer data platforms are quickly emerging to help publishers organize and leverage their data with unprecedented efficiency. Coupled with a user-ID void, this means that first-party data will inevitably become the barometer of media valuation. And the private marketplace stands as the gatekeeper of this data-rich inventory. Long term, PMPs will continue to secure trust and wield significant clout with the close-knit publisher communities they serve. And they’ll live on to offer viable solutions for buyers in coming times of turmoil. Follow AdExchanger ([@adexchanger]() on Twitter. © 2019 AdExchanger and AdExchanger.com are trademarks or registered trademarks. All rights reserved. [Facebook]( [Twitter]( [YouTube]( [View in web browser]( This message was sent to {EMAIL} To ensure delivery to your inbox, [add us to your address book](. AdExchanger • Access Intelligence LLC • 9211 Corporate Blvd., 4th Floor, Rockville, MD 20850 | [Privacy Policy]( [Update My Preferences | Unsubscribe]( [spacer.gif](

Marketing emails from accessintel.com

View More
Sent On

27/09/2019

Sent On

27/09/2019

Sent On

27/09/2019

Sent On

26/09/2019

Sent On

26/09/2019

Sent On

25/09/2019

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.