Newsletter Subject

Current Affairs. Strange World.

From

thesignal.email

Email Address

newsletter@thesignal.email

Sent On

Sat, Aug 7, 2021 02:27 PM

Email Preheader Text

Does it really matter who wrote that novel? Hannah Williams on how appreciating literature doesnâ€

Does it really matter who wrote that novel? Hannah Williams on how appreciating literature doesn’t mean identifying with its author.  “Who can relate directly to walking around 1920s Paris and meeting the literary stars of the day? These things allow us a kind of access to worlds we don’t inhabit”  Why Read Fiction Does it really matter who wrote that novel? Hannah Williams on how appreciating literature doesn’t mean identifying with its author.   (Originally published 2021 | 02.19) The line between progressive cultural criticism—book reviews, film reviews, television reviews, etc.—and progressive political commentary has been thinning noticeably. As the American critic Lauren Oyler noted, there’s a growing cultural pressure on creators to justify their work as “[necessary](.” Published critics and social-media commentators trend toward assessing new novels, movies, and TV shows according to whether their creations represent correct political arguments. They more often judge art as [bad]( if the artist ever had objectionable politics or behavior in their personal lives. They might even equate the appreciation of a work of art with an endorsement of any dated ideas from the time or place it came from. Guided by contemporary criticism, we might easily assume that a bigoted protagonist indicates a bigoted work. Even if we share the belief that art should be inclusive, both in the range of artists people can appreciate and the diversity of lives their work can represent, should it also be so exclusive?  The London-based writer Hannah Williams noticed a discrepancy between what she likes to read and what, in the progressive literary world she belongs to, women are expected to read—or more importantly, not to read. And she discovered that she wasn’t alone. In an [article]( for Mel Magazine, Williams shared the accounts of several women whose reading habits diverge from these expectations. The article was a response to a social-media meme about white male writers and the bad ex-boyfriends women associate with their books. According to Williams, getting past the idea that white men’s experiences are somehow the most universal doesn’t have to mean imposing restrictions on readers who aren’t white men. If fiction is an opportunity for anyone to gain a special insight into the human experience from authors of all kinds of backgrounds and identities, Williams says, then it doesn’t help anyone to insist that only people who share the same race or gender as canonical authors should read them.  ———  Phoebe Maltz Bovy: Can you describe the social-media phenomenon that got you thinking about all this?  Hannah Williams: It’s a trend, most popular on Twitter but getting big on TikTok and Instagram as well, to talk about certain books or authors as belonging to bad-white-straight men. Either the authors themselves are bad-white-straight men, or their readers are, or even the books themselves belong to bad-white-straight men. You see it in “controversial opinion” tweets, where people ask, What’s your controversial take? What book does everybody else love that you actually hate? En masse, people will say things like, I hate The Catcher in the Rye, because it’s a book that my ex-boyfriend loved, and it’s shallow.  There’s an analog with a lot of other forms of media. There was a [piece]( in The Guardian that was like, All my ex-boyfriends have tried to make me watch There Will Be Blood—as if this was this very negative thing, this thing she didn’t want to see because it belonged to ex-boyfriends.  Bovy: Who participates in this meme? Millennial women? Gen-Z women? Men?  Williams: I have this theory that a lot of trends that have become really big on the internet are actually from Tumblr five years ago. So I think that partly the people involved in this meme were millennials from that kind of scene, who haven’t really moved past it.  With the Gen-Z crowd, I see them picking this up a lot more on TikTok—and removing even more nuance from it. So I don’t think it’s anything that’s going away—or that they’re rebelling against the millennial mindset on this. They seem very into the idea that we should castigate these authors. I’m thinking of this girl who did a [TikTok about Joan Didion](. It was like, If you like X male author you should instead read Didion—as if this male author is a bad version of that female author: Philip Roth is for men who are scared of Joan Didion.  A lot of it is women, but surprisingly, I see loads of men doing it. I guess it’s a kind of brownie-point, not like other men way of differentiating yourself.   More from Hannah Williams at The Signal: “People want to have a wide variety of narratives and to be able to hear from different voices that are traditionally less represented in publishing. I completely agree with that. But at the same time, I find the idea bizarre that you would read a Cormac McCarthy book, such as The Road, and you would think, Oh, yeah, a man can relate to this, and I can’t. Because who can actually relate to wandering through a dystopian hellscape?”  “Authors don’t necessarily have the identities people assume they have, either. It discourages any kind of deeper analysis—as with Roth’s Jewishness, or with a friend of mine who reads a lot of Hemingway and finds it very homoerotic and queer. The meme denies all of those kinds of readings, and any other more interesting readings into a book’s themes, purely to place a dominant significance on, Do I look like this character?”  “It’s undeniable that for too long literature portrayed an incredibly narrow segment of human experience—and still does. But to shrink fiction to a simple dynamic of relatable versus not-relatable seems to offer a misrepresentation of why people engage with novels—and of what we can gain from interacting with them.”   ———  Free Access This Week  [Here’s the Deal]( Can America’s new center-left governing coalition hold? Matthew Yglesias on progress and pragmatism in Joe Biden’s Washington.  ———  For Subscribers  [Freedom Money]( Could Bitcoin become a global liberation technology? Alex Gladstein on the democratic promise of cryptocurrency.  [The Ballot Game]( Is U.S. democracy more vulnerable today than when Donald Trump was president? Steven Levitsky on the Republican Party’s increasing authoritarian investment in undermining the vote.  [The Cult of Now]( What’s wrong with judging everything against the standards of the moment? Jacob T. Levy on the perils of understanding history as moral progress.  ———  For exclusive access to The Signal’s full articles, artwork, and archive:   ———     This email was sent to {EMAIL}  [Unsubscribe here](   © 2021 The Signal    Â

Marketing emails from thesignal.email

View More
Sent On

10/08/2021

Sent On

09/08/2021

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.