Newsletter Subject

Investing Lessons From 'The Hedgehog and the Fox'

From

stansberryresearch.com

Email Address

customerservice@exct.stansberryresearch.com

Sent On

Sat, Aug 14, 2021 11:36 AM

Email Preheader Text

I like simple insights that can help you quickly learn a lot about yourself. And it starts with a si

I like simple insights that can help you quickly learn a lot about yourself. And it starts with a simple question that has profound implications... [Stansberry Research Logo] Delivering World-Class Financial Research Since 1999 [DailyWealth] The Weekend Edition is pulled from the daily Stansberry Digest. --------------------------------------------------------------- Investing Lessons From 'The Hedgehog and the Fox' By Dan Ferris, editor, Extreme Value --------------------------------------------------------------- Over the past year or so, I have come back to a timeless piece of advice every now and then... You must learn to "know yourself well" in order to become a better investor. Whether you believe you've already discovered a system that will work for you or are struggling to improve, the rewards you seek as an investor require greater self-knowledge. As you can tell, I like simple insights that can help you quickly learn a lot about yourself. I've recently found another one of those, and when all is said and done, I'm confident that you'll get to know yourself much better... It starts with a simple question that has profound implications... Are you a hedgehog or a fox? If the question rings a bell, maybe you're familiar with the 1953 essay by philosopher Sir Isaiah Berlin, "The Hedgehog and the Fox." The topic is introduced in the opening line... There is a line among the fragments of the Greek poet Archilochus which says: "The fox knows many things, but the hedgehog knows one big thing." Berlin starts by explaining the figurative difference between hedgehogs and foxes. According to the essay, hedgehogs... ... relate everything to a single central vision, one system, less or more coherent or articulate, in terms of which they understand, think and feel – a single, universal organizing principle. Meanwhile, foxes... ... pursue many ends, often unrelated and even contradictory, connected, if at all, only in some de facto way... without, consciously or unconsciously, seeking to fit them into, or exclude them from, any one unchanging, all-embracing, sometimes self-contradictory and incomplete, at times fanatical, unitary inner vision. The idea of determining if you're guided by "one big thing" versus "many things" is a valuable way to gauge your own investing style. Do you invest in "one big thing" like the hedgehog... or in "many things" like the fox? Before you answer that question, know this... Most successful investors are hedgehogs... Hedgehog investors come up with their own system – their "one big thing" – and they eliminate everything that doesn't conform to it. In an upcoming Stansberry Investor Hour podcast, I interviewed a classic hedgehog investor – author Chris Mayer of Woodlock House Family Capital. Like all hedgehogs, Chris has created his own original investment framework. It was honed over many years... And he can describe it easily. Chris calls it the "CODE" system... - C is for "cheap." He's looking for stocks that are undervalued. - O is for "owner operator." He wants companies run by folks who own large chunks of their own stock. - D is for "disclosure." He relies heavily on public disclosures as an outside, passive, minority investor... So they must be good. - E is for "excellent financial condition." He doesn't like companies with too much debt or other risks on their balance sheets. Most stocks don't conform to Chris's framework, so he doesn't often find new investing opportunities. But more important, he also doesn't waste his valuable time looking at the thousands of companies he would never invest in, no matter how popular or profitable they might be. Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B) founder Warren Buffett is a classic hedgehog, too... Like Chris, Buffett has a simple, four-part "filter" that eliminates a huge number of opportunities. This helps him home in on the businesses that appear most attractive. Buffett only wants to own businesses – publicly traded or not – that have these four characteristics. In order to get his attention, the business must be one that... - He can understand - Holds a durable competitive advantage - Has a management team he can trust - Is available at a price that's not too expensive Like Chris's CODE system, Buffett's four filters constitute "one big thing." He has built a huge, cash-gushing company by focusing like a hedgehog on finding as many businesses as possible that conformed to his standards and ignoring those that didn't. Although most successful investors are hedgehogs, foxes do exist... Take Jim Rogers, for example... Rogers founded the Quantum Fund with George Soros in 1973. The two legendary investors made 3,365% from 1970 through 1980, while the S&P 500 Index rose just 47%. According to Rogers, when he was younger, he got confused listening to other people... So he just ignored them, did his own work, and made up his own mind. From there, Rogers became a financial maverick... He traveled the world, learning about many different countries and their markets firsthand. He even drove around the world twice – once on a motorcycle and once in a car. Rogers doesn't stick to "one big thing"... He'll buy any currency, stock, bond, or other financial instrument from any country. And he'll buy any commodity, any futures contract, or anything else... anywhere, anytime... as long as he believes it's a good bet. A fox like Rogers is ready for anything, so he's a lot less specific about what he's looking for compared to a hedgehog. --------------------------------------------------------------- Recommended Link: ['Don't Buy ANYTHING! Unless...']( One of Stansberry's top analysts is warning all readers: meme stocks, NFTs, penny stocks, and countless other "hot" plays could soon bankrupt investors. He's urging you: DO NOT – under ANY circumstance – buy anything in this market UNLESS it checks off these five "must haves." [Get the full details right here](. --------------------------------------------------------------- When it comes to daily life, most folks seem more foxlike to me... In that way, a hedgehog with zero foxlike characteristics is rare, too. To underscore that point, I encourage you to check out the book Range. Author David Epstein opens by comparing golfing legend Tiger Woods with tennis great Roger Federer... With a lot of encouragement and coaching from his father, Woods focused on nothing but golf as soon as he could hold the golf clubs... At age 2, he used a club that came up to his shoulder to drive the ball far enough to impress comedian Bob Hope on TV. Federer enjoyed sports from an early age, too. But unlike Woods, as Epstein wrote... As a boy, [Federer] played squash with his father on Sundays. He dabbled in skiing, wrestling, swimming, and skateboarding. He played basketball, handball, tennis, table tennis, [and] badminton over his neighbor's fence, and soccer at school. Federer later credited his broad interest in various sports as a child for helping him with coordination and general athleticism. It clearly paid off... He has won 20 Grand Slam men's singles titles in his career. And he has pocketed more than $130 million in prize money. Woods is one of the most pristine hedgehogs in history... The singular pursuit of golfing mastery has ruled his existence from birth. But what about Federer? He started out dabbling like a fox in a wide variety of sports. But it was only when he focused like a hedgehog on tennis that he became a world-class athlete. So in reference to my opening question (which one to choose), maybe the answer is more complex... Maybe the point of the fox-or-hedgehog dichotomy is just to understand how each mode of thinking can help you achieve great success at investing (or anything else worth doing). Maybe we're all destined to be foxes until we learn how to be hedgehogs... For example, although Buffett focused on investing from his youth, he dabbled like Federer in other areas before starting to concentrate on companies that fit his four core filters... While running his hedge-fund partnerships in the 1950s and 1960s, Buffett bought many types of classic value plays... He bought stocks trading at discounts to book value, stocks with low price-to-earnings ratios, merger arbitrage opportunities, and myriad other so-called "special situations." He also speculated in the silver market on at least two occasions. At that point, Buffett was ready for anything... He was an investment fox. Now, I want you to ask yourself this... In your life so far, have you been a full-blown hedgehog, filtering out everything that didn't coincide with your one big thing? Or have you been more of a fox, trying different jobs, investments, and other pursuits... ready for anything that felt like the right thing to read, think, or do next? I'm willing to bet most of you are more foxlike. So when it comes down to it, the hedgehog-or-fox question is really about self-discovery... It's not about making up rules that all investors must follow. Every situation is unique. You need to make your own rules or find the ones that work best for you. However, there is one way in which all investors must become hedgehogs. A hedgehog's top priority is to avoid being eaten by a fox. Because of that, he evolved to have an ironclad defense against them – his sharp quills. That's a hedgehog's "one big thing." For investors, not getting killed by a fox means avoiding catastrophic loss. All successful investors are hedgehogs when it comes to risk... It's absolutely impossible to succeed as an investor without learning to recognize, understand, and control risk. Now, let's put things together into a prescription for investors... First, begin with the simple question... Are you a hedgehog or a fox? Unless you're like Tiger Woods, you're probably more foxlike than hedgehoglike in life. You've probably done many things rather than focus on "one big thing" since childhood. It's OK to recognize aspects of both hedgehogs and foxes in your style of living and investing. Next, you must confront the one non-negotiable fact: All investors must be hedgehogs about risk. Hedgehogs know "one big thing"... and risk is that thing for all investors. After you self-reflect and learn to become a risk-focused hedgehog, I recommend reading broadly on many topics... Don't be afraid to start a bunch of books and not finish them. (That's OK... You're gaining a wealth of knowledge with every page.) Check in with multiple news sources each day. Imitate Jim Rogers, too... Travel as much as possible. Get your boots on the ground in places where few others have been. Do your own thinking and ignore advice that confuses you, no matter how much you might admire the person giving it. I highly recommend studying lots of individual businesses and becoming familiar with many different assets, one at a time – even if you think you'll never invest in them. The more different businesses you learn about, the more you'll integrate that knowledge into the "one big thing" of growing wealth by investing your capital. In the end, most successful investors end up as hedgehogs. But almost everyone winds up living and learning like foxes until they get to that point. So if you look in the mirror and see a fox today, keep reading and learning. One of these days, you'll catch your reflection and see a hedgehog staring back at you. Good investing, Dan Ferris Editor's note: Dan found a new stock that is different than his other recommendations... And he's bullish about it. Dan invests conservatively, like a "hedgehog." He doesn't jump on "hot topics," meme stocks, or follow the herd that often. But the upside potential he sees in the smallest extreme value opportunity in seven years is something that you need to know about. [Click here to get all the details](. --------------------------------------------------------------- [Tell us what you think of this content]( [We value our subscribers’ feedback. To help us improve your experience, we’d like to ask you a couple brief questions.]( [Click here to rate this e-mail]( You have received this e-mail as part of your subscription to DailyWealth. If you no longer want to receive e-mails from DailyWealth [click here](. Published by Stansberry Research. You’re receiving this e-mail at {EMAIL}. Stansberry Research welcomes comments or suggestions at feedback@stansberryresearch.com. This address is for feedback only. For questions about your account or to speak with customer service, call 888-261-2693 (U.S.) or 443-839-0986 (international) Monday-Friday, 9 a.m.-5 p.m. Eastern time. Or e-mail info@stansberrycustomerservice.com. Please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized investment advice. © 2021 Stansberry Research. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Stansberry Research, 1125 N Charles St, Baltimore, MD 21201 or [www.stansberryresearch.com](. Any brokers mentioned constitute a partial list of available brokers and is for your information only. Stansberry Research does not recommend or endorse any brokers, dealers, or investment advisors. Stansberry Research forbids its writers from having a financial interest in any security they recommend to our subscribers. All employees of Stansberry Research (and affiliated companies) must wait 24 hours after an investment recommendation is published online – or 72 hours after a direct mail publication is sent – before acting on that recommendation. This work is based on SEC filings, current events, interviews, corporate press releases, and what we've learned as financial journalists. It may contain errors, and you shouldn't make any investment decision based solely on what you read here. It's your money and your responsibility.

EDM Keywords (269)

youth younger writers work willing whole well wealth way waste warning wants want value used urging unique undervalued understand underscore trust traveled travel topic thousands thinking think thing terms tennis tell system sundays suggestions succeed subscription subscribers style struggling stocks stock stick starts starting started start stansberry standards sports speak soon something soccer skateboarding shoulder sent sees seek see security says said running rules ruled rogers risks risk rewards responsibility reflection reference redistribution recommendations recommendation recommend receiving received really ready read rate rare questions pulled published profitable probably price prescription possible popular point pocketed places people part others order opportunities ones one ok often nothing next neighbor need myriad must much motorcycle money mode mirror mind might maybe matter making make made lot looking look long living like life let learned learn knowledge know jump investors investing invest introduced interviewed integrate information incomplete improve important ignoring ignored idea however honed home history herd helps helping help hedgehogs hedgehoglike hedgehog guided ground golf get gauge gaining framework fragments foxlike foxes fox follow folks focus fit finish finding find fence feel feedback federer father far familiar explaining experience existence exclude evolved everything endorse end encouragement encourage employees eliminates eaten drive done discounts disclosure different determining destined describe days dailywealth dabbled created country countless coordination content confuses conformed conform confident concentrate compared companies commodity comes coincide coherent coaching club click chris child checks check cheap catch career capital came buy businesses bunch bullish built boots books birth bet believes believe become became based badminton avoid available attention ask articulate areas appear anything answer although also afraid address acting account 1980 1973 1970 1950s

Marketing emails from stansberryresearch.com

View More
Sent On

26/05/2024

Sent On

26/05/2024

Sent On

25/05/2024

Sent On

25/05/2024

Sent On

25/05/2024

Sent On

24/05/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.