Newsletter Subject

Research Brief: Mobile Smartphone Shoppers Struggling With Navigation

From

mediapost.com

Email Address

news@mediapost.com

Sent On

Tue, Nov 29, 2016 11:17 AM

Email Preheader Text

Tuesday, Nov. 29, 2016 Mobile Smartphone Shoppers Struggling With Navigation According to a new repo

Tuesday, Nov. 29, 2016 Mobile Smartphone Shoppers Struggling With Navigation According to a new report from comScore, mobile devices accounted for 20% of the $84.3 billion in US digital commerce spending in Q3 2016. That’s the first time mobile devices have reached that mark, as e-commerce sales continue to shift from desktops to mobile devices. Mobile Share of US Digital Retail Spending Year/Quarter Share of Digital Retail Q4/2012 11.3% Q4/2013 11.7 Q4/2014 13.0 Q4/2015 16.9 Q1/2016 18.6 Q2/2016 19.8 Q3/2016 20.0 Source, MarketingCharts/ComScore, November 2016 Mobile devices could be even more influential, says the report, if some user experience problems were taken care of. Recent research from Monetate indicates that only around half of e-commerce site visits come from mobile devices. Mobile’s smaller share of actual sales is a result of lower conversion rates relative to desktop and smartphones, as mobile users struggle with navigation, difficulty with checkouts, and security concerns. These problems lead to lower shopping cart conversion rates, with just 1 in every 6 shopping carts on smartphones turning into orders, as opposed to 1 in 4 on desktops. The report from comScore, says the report, notes that spending has been strong on both desktops and mobiles this year, which signals a bright holiday period ahead. Most forecasts call for a robust season, with mobiles continuing to exert influence on shopping behaviors. And Marketing Charts, from a September release, reports that smartphones and tablets grew to account for 49% of global e-commerce site visits in Q2 2016, per a quarterly Monetate analysis of its clients. In the US, mobile devices reached roughly 48% share of site visits, while in the UK, where mobile recently surpassed 50% of retail e-commerce transactions, these devices grew to almost two-thirds of e-commerce site visits. While smartphones far outpace tablets in e-commerce site traffic, they are well behind in conversion rates, suggesting that they continue to be used more for product research than for purchases, says the report. Forrester Research data indicates that 47% of smartphone-owning adults in the US research products on their devices on at least a weekly device, with 29% reporting actually making purchases with that frequency. For the e-commerce clients analyzed in Monetate’s E-Commerce Quarterly for Q2: - Conversion rates averaged 1.48% globally on smartphones, less than half the rate for tablets (3.46%) and computers (3.99%) - Conversion rates stayed close to the global average in the US (1.34% for smartphones; 3.42% for tablets; and 4.11% for computers), and - Were considerably higher in the UK (2.8% for smartphones; 4.36% for tablets; and 5.8% for computers). These device patterns tended to stay consistent across add-to-cart rates and page views, with computers edging tablets, and smartphones further behind, says the report. There was a bigger gulf between computers and mobile devices in order values, which averaged $138.87 for traditional devices compared to $98.70 for tablets and $82.65 for smartphones. Finally, concludes the report, in terms of traffic sources, average order values were highest for direct traffic ($123.79), followed by search ($116.53) and email ($111.85), with social further back ($88.92). For additional [information from comScore], please visit here, and [from]Marketing[Charts], go here. [Post your response to the public Research Brief blog.] [See what others are saying on the Research Brief blog.] We use the term research in the broadest possible sense. We do not perform an audit, nor do we analyze the data for accuracy or reliability. Our intention is to inform you of the existence of research materials and so we present reports as they are presented to us. The only requirements we impose are that they are potentially useful and relevant to our readers and that they pass the rudimentary test of relying on acceptable industry standards. We explicitly do not take responsibility for the findings. Please be aware of this and check the source for yourself if you intend to rely on any of the data we present. You are receiving this newsletter at {EMAIL} as part of your free membership with MediaPost. If this issue was forwarded to you and you would like to begin receiving a copy of your own, please visit our site - [www.mediapost.com] - and click on [subscribe] in the e-newsletter box. For advertising opportunities see our online [media kit]. If you'd rather not receive this newsletter in the future [click here]. [Email powered by SparkPost]We welcome and appreciate forwarding of our newsletters in their entirety or in part with proper attribution. (c) 2016 MediaPost Communications, 1460 Broadway, New York, NY 10036

Marketing emails from mediapost.com

View More
Sent On

29/11/2016

Sent On

29/11/2016

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.