Newsletter Subject

A quick explainer on money in politics

From

katieporter.com

Email Address

info@katieporter.com

Sent On

Tue, Apr 2, 2024 09:10 PM

Email Preheader Text

there are two main ways money influences elections Money in politics is a huge and fundamental probl

there are two main ways money influences elections [Truth to Power PAC]( Money in politics is a huge and fundamental problem, and there are two main ways money influences elections. - Corporate PACs: Corporate PACs can give $5,000 to a candidate each election cycle. Now, individually that may not sound like a lot. But taken together, companies are able to team up and sway policy. For example, every Big Pharma company can give to a lawmaker, along with their trade group. Taken altogether, it’s a system that results in legalized corruption and special privileges for corporate interests—which stand in the way of higher wages, environmental protections, and even government oversight. - Super PACs: Super PACs can accept unlimited sums of money from just about anyone. In our own Senate race last month, super PACs spent more than $10M against us, and voters only learned which group was truly funding those ads after the election. Super PACs, whether funded by conservative billionaires who are ideologically motivated, or by a corporate interest hoping to shore up a tax break or favorable regulations, threaten to undermine the fairness of our elections. Each election cycle since the Citizens United Supreme Court decision, they dump more and more money into races, eroding the faith Americans have in our political process. Since getting to Congress in 2019, I’ve been leading the fight for campaign finance reform. But I’ll be honest, right now we don’t have the votes to pass the serious overhaul bill we need. But right now, without passing a single bill, we can encourage Members of Congress to lead by example and reject corporate PAC money. Every single Member has that choice, and while I’m proud that around 70 of my colleagues have joined me in rejecting it, that leaves over 460 people to go! That’s where Truth to Power comes in: I started this organization in 2020 to help elect Democrats who reject corporate PAC money. By supporting these candidates—whether in competitive primaries or in purple districts, we can change this norm and create a Democratic party that isn’t beholden to corporate cash. Truth to Power is grassroots funded, and so I can only continue this work with your support. [Can you give a gift of $5 today that will power our fight?]( [Donate ›››]( Many thanks for considering, Katie [Donate ›››]( Paid for by Truth to Power PAC This email was sent to [{EMAIL}](#). Email is the most important way we keep in touch with people like you. But, if you'd like to receive fewer emails, [you can do so here](. If you need to remove yourself from our email list, [click here to unsubscribe](. To contribute via check, please address to: Truth to Power PAC, PO Box 5176, Irvine, CA 92616 Â

Marketing emails from katieporter.com

View More
Sent On

30/05/2024

Sent On

29/05/2024

Sent On

28/05/2024

Sent On

24/05/2024

Sent On

23/05/2024

Sent On

21/05/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.