Newsletter Subject

And the winner is ...

From

informa.com

Email Address

cmi@news.contentinstitute.com

Sent On

Mon, Feb 12, 2024 03:09 PM

Email Preheader Text

mlns='> No, not *that* winner, this one / Daily News and Alert 2.12.24 Connect with CMI Hi there, Di

mlns='> No, not *that* winner, this one [View Message in Browser]( / [Add Us to Safe Sender List]( [Content Marketing Institute]( [Content Marketing Institute]( Daily News and Alert 2.12.24 Connect with CMI Hi there, Did you watch? I’m not asking about the [insert your copyright-dodging moniker for the NFL championship here]. I’m wondering if you paid attention to the clash of AI titans that played out before, during, and (probably) after Sunday’s event. Google and Microsoft both debuted ads for AI apps: Microsoft’s [Copilot: Your Everyday AI Companion]( (screen grab below) shows several people using the company’s new Copilot app to help them do things they were told they could never do (open their own business, get a degree, make a movie, etc.). [A young woman uses her phone in the Microsoft ad Copilot: Your Everyday AI Companion]( Google’s [Javier in Frame]( (screen grab below) shows a person with impaired sight using the Guided Frame feature on a Pixel phone to take and share photographs. (Don’t miss the companion [backstory video]( [A man with impaired sight takes a selfie with his dog in Google’s Super Bowl ad Javier in Frame.]( Both companies released the ads before The Big Game and earned media coverage. Both put people in the lead role while relegating AI to a friendly pocket-sized helper. Both followed Robert Rose’s “Tell it well” advice. But which told it well-est (ahem)? Which ad is more likely to lead to brand engagement, loyalty, and sales? And will either one succeed in directing attention away from concerns over the impact of AI on misinformation, job losses, the wealth gap, copyright, and the environment? The winner (in your opinion) is: [Google](mailto:kim.moutsos@informa.com?subject=Google%20wins&elqTrackId=B68293068BB6FDFEDBA6D3C7973EF103) [Microsoft](mailto:kim.moutsos@informa.com?subject=Microsoft%20wins&elqTrackId=3BDAE205E9402AA859953F81348A4DC2) [None of these candidates](mailto:kim.moutsos@informa.com?subject=Nobody%20wins&elqTrackId=FBE6FA3731664DC8B46B0852F53697E4) In the meantime, here are more resources to help you move your audience.  Kim Moutsos Vice President of Editorial Content Marketing Institute [Share your feedback](mailto:kim.moutsos@informa.com?subject=CMI%20content%20feedback&elqTrackId=64550BB2B7DCF779B66C47D5721093C2)  ICYMI: [How a Spoonful of Story Helps Even ‘Boring’ Content Go Down]( Mary Poppins had it almost right: Just find the story and — snap — the content’s job’s a game. Then, even the boring tasks you undertake become — if not a piece of cake, a more creative endeavor rather than a mundane construction project.  Thursday: [Single Sourcing Content: A Path Forward]( | 1 p.m. ET Single sourcing content — making one piece of content work in multiple channels — feels like something that should work, but very few get it right. Join this webinar to explore the theory behind single sourcing and learn how leading organizations are finding success.  Next Tuesday: [Help for the AI-Challenged]( | Live with CMI | 1 p.m. ET Does it feel like you’re already behind when it comes to AI? Get advice from Heather Murray, founder of AI for Non-Techies, in an all-new livestream, Live with CMI (hosted by Amanda Subler and JK Kalinowski) next Tuesday, February 20. Heather will explain what everyone gets wrong about AI and how to get started.   To change your email preferences or unsubscribe, visit our [subscription center.]( Copyright © 2024 Informa Connect, All rights reserved Content Marketing Institute, an Informa Connect brand 605 3rd Ave | New York | NY 10158 [Terms of Service]( | [Privacy Statement]( [informa tech]

informa.com

Kim Moutsos at Content Marketing Institute

Marketing emails from informa.com

View More
Sent On

07/06/2024

Sent On

07/06/2024

Sent On

07/06/2024

Sent On

06/06/2024

Sent On

05/06/2024

Sent On

05/06/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.