Newsletter Subject

All in

From

honeycopy.com

Email Address

cole@honeycopy.com

Sent On

Thu, Nov 17, 2022 07:31 PM

Email Preheader Text

An argument for walking out of the casino. November 17, 2022 | All in An argument for walking out of

An argument for walking out of the casino. November 17, 2022 | [Read Online]( All in An argument for walking out of the casino. Cole Schafer November 17, 2022 [fb]( [tw]( [in]( [email](mailto:?subject=Post%20from%20Sticky%20Notes&body=All%20in%3A%20An%20argument%20for%20walking%20out%20of%20the%20casino.%0A%0Ahttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.getthesticky.com%2Fp%2Fall-in) As a general rule of thumb, I try not to criticize without offering solutions. So, consider yesterday [my criticism]( and today my solution. If social media isn't dead, it's dying. Not so much social media as a whole but social media as we know it today. My prediction is that over the next 3-5 years, engagement on TikTok will dwarf that of Instagram, Twitter, Snapchat, Facebook and Linkedin. Currently, there are 1 billion active users on TikTok. If this were a country, it'd be the third largest on the planet by population density; and because countries come with their own unique economies, TikTok certainly will too. Brands are already flooding the platform with sponsorship dollars ready to throw at creators. From the outside looking in, TikTok appears to be a screaming success. It just might be... if it manages to not make the same mistakes every other platform has made before it. So far, every single social media platform that has lived and died has championed brands over creators. The creators give the platforms their culture. The users love it. The brands show up with fat checks. The top 1% of creators get filthy fucking rich. The getting is good for a while until the users get fed up with the ads and sponsored posts. The engagement suddenly drops. The remaining 99% of creators walk away with nothing. The users walk away with their time wasted. The brands walk their way to the bank, laughing like hyenas. I criticized Elon Musk's hostile takeover of Twitter and how ham-fisted he's handled the entire thing in yesterday's piece but I've got to applaud the guy for *attempting* to give the power back to the users. I highly doubt he will pull it off but I respect the tenacity. As social media platforms are dropping like flies, it begs the following question... " Could the largest social media platform to ever exist rise from their ashes? " Potentially. However, while the world is in desperate need of Twitter 2.0 and Instagram 2.0, I'm concerned that humanity will get tired of the joke before these new platforms are ready to step up to the mic. What's more likely is that social media will be the catalyst for community. If social media has taught us anything, it's that 10 close relationships are of much greater value––emotionally, mentally, spiritually and even financially––than 1,000 acquaintances. Naval Ravikant, the entrepreneur-philosopher, has a fascinating quote that sums up this value beautifully... " All the benefits in life come from compound interest: relationships, money, habits, anything of importance. " Compound interest is something these platforms have failed to deliver. The users and creators are getting sensationally fucked but we all keep showing up for the same reason that the chain-smoking gambler keeps pulling the lever on the slot machine. Every so often we hit it big, a tweet goes viral, a post gets a shit ton of likes, somebody notable notices us and we're good for pulling the lever another 1,000x. Something I'm reflecting on going into this next year is how I can step away from the slot machine and double down on truer, deeper human connections. I'm wrestling with some pretty big questions. How much in new business would this decision cost me? How many new readers would I be leaving on the table? How will I remain... relevant? Some of these concerns are genuine. New business means money and I need money to survive. But, relevance is my ego throwing a tantrum in my chest. Relevance is my addiction to the likes and the retweets and the comments that validate my existence. If writers like Shel Silverstein and artists like Andy Warhol were able to support themselves with their work and their relationships and their communities, why do I feel that my "big break" is going to come by garnering the attention of strangers? This brings me back to the question I posed in [yesterday's piece](... " Why is it that it feels harder than ever before to get people's attention? " The best answer I've been able to scrape together is that everybody is too busy getting people's attention. Succeeding over the next couple of decades will be less about relevance and more about depth. This doesn't mean there isn't a place in our lives for broadcasting to the masses but it means that we can no longer hang our hats on our loudspeakers. But, I digress. By [Cole Schafer](. P.S. If you aren't subscribed to Sticky Notes, you can change that [here](. Share Sticky Notes Assuming you think the words you just read are "good", you can spread the good word by clicking the big black button down below or highlighting that pretty red link. You currently have 0 referrals. [Click to Share]( Or copy and paste this link to others: [ [tw]( [ig]( [in]( Update your email preferences or unsubscribe [here]( © Sticky Notes 228 Park Ave S, #29976, New York, New York 10003 [Publish on beehiiv](

Marketing emails from honeycopy.com

View More
Sent On

01/11/2023

Sent On

30/10/2023

Sent On

28/10/2023

Sent On

25/10/2023

Sent On

24/10/2023

Sent On

23/10/2023

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.