Newsletter Subject

🏆 Closing Soon So Please Don't Miss It - Footballguys Playoff Challenge 2: Divisional Round

From

footballguys.com

Email Address

bryant@footballguys.com

Sent On

Fri, Jan 20, 2023 03:38 AM

Email Preheader Text

Special Limited-Time Offer from Footballguys ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌?

Special Limited-Time Offer from Footballguys  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ [Go PRO]( | [Rate My Team]() [Unsubscribe]( | [Sign Up]() [Footballguys.com](=)Special Limited-Time Offer From Footballguys --------------------------------------------------------------- Howdy {NAME}, --------------------------------------------------------------- [Footballguys Playoff Challenge 2: Divisional Round]() --------------------------------------------------------------- Playoff Football is the best football. I can't wait for Saturday. Last week, we sold out all 16,000 entries for our annual Footballguys Playoff Challenge a whole day early. But if you missed out, don't despair. This week, we've opened a [new contest for the Divisional Round](). But it won't last long. The [Footballguys Playoff Challenge 2: Divisional Round]() features a fully-guaranteed $25,000 Grand Prize and a total prize pool of $122,750. The rules are the same as the original Footballguys Playoff Challenge and the entry fee is still just $35 per team. But hurry -- this contest is capped at only 4,000 teams and it's already more than 60% sold out. We've even got a killer guide on [how to crush this contest]( by our own Sigmund Bloom. Check it out below. The [Footballguys Playoff Challenge 2: Divisional Round]() is the perfect way to take a second swing at Playoff Fantasy Football. And if our [Footballguys Playoff Challenge 2: Divisional Round]() is already sold out by the time you read this, make sure to check out its sister contest, The [FFPC Playoff Challenge 2: Divisional Round](). It's a $200 entry fee with a $100,000 grand prize. Same great format. Make sure to grab your team in the [Footballguys Playoff Challenge 2:Divisional Round](). It's a fantastic way to get a second shot at Playoff Fantasy Football glory. Thanks for being part of the Footballguys Family and I hope you enjoy the Divisional Round games. Peace, J --------------------------------------------------------------- [Building the Perfect Playoff Challenge 2.0 Lineup]( by Sigmund Bloom Exclusive to Footballguys.com --------------------------------------------------------------- Wild card weekend gave us outcomes that hinged on any number of questionable decisions by both players and officials. The kind of outcomes that give you pangs of regret if you entered the FFPC/Footballguys Playoff Challenge and made teams that contemplated a longer run by the Chargers or Vikings or an upset of the Bills or Bengals in the first round that was narrowly avoided. It might make you want to have a do-over for the rest of the playoffs in a similar competition. Voila! Life doesn’t give you do-overs, but fantasy football does. You'll be able to pick eight players to form a lineup that will (hopefully) cash a $25,000 grand prize after the Lombardi Trophy has been awarded. The main details of the [Footballguys Playoff Challenge Divisional Round]() - Entry fee: $35 per team - The contest is capped at a maximum of 4,000 entries - $25,000 Grand Prize - $122,750 in guaranteed prizes paying down to 600th place - The contest runs from the start of Divisional Weekend through the Super Bowls - Teams consist of 8 players in an FFPC lineup (1 QB, 2 RB, 2 WR, 1 TE, 2 FX) - Each team chooses from 8 playoff teams but only 1 per team - IMPORTANT: Points for Super Bowl are DOUBLED - All rosters will be locked on Saturday, January 21, at 4:30 pm ET - No roster adjustments will be allowed, even for games starting later - For more details, see the [full rules and payout structure on the contest page]( And if you'd like a shot at a larger prize pool with a larger entry fee. The [FFPC Playoff Challenge 2.0]( features a $100,000 Grand Prize with a $200 entry. What we’ve learned to this point: - San Francisco had the best team performance but will have to face a formidable Dallas team in the second round, while the Eagles will get a green Giants upstart with [Daniel Jones]( hitting a new career peak. Since the Giants are familiar with the Eagles, playing them close with [Davis Webb](=) just two weeks ago, the Eagles will have a test to advance. - The Chiefs dodged a third game with a Chargers team that played them very close twice this year and instead will get a Jaguars team that just pulled off an all-time playoff comeback. Kansas City’s path to the AFC title game got a little easier. - Buffalo and Cincinnati both had way-too-close-for-comfort wins against division rivals with backup quarterbacks. [Josh Allen](=) was under constant pressure. The Bills can’t beat the Chiefs if they allow as many giveaways and sacks. The Bengals offense stalled out in the second half against a very good Ravens defense. They’ll need more than 17 offensive points to win in Kansas City. - Dallas smoked the Buccaneers and looks primed to make a better showing than they did when the 49ers dismissed them from the playoffs last year. When you sit down to attack the puzzle of your Playoff Challenge Part 2 lineup, one truth quickly emerges: With only eight teams, we have to think more about lineup diversity. Quarterback The candidate list here is clear: [Josh Allen](=), [Patrick Mahomes II](, and [Jalen Hurts](). [Joe Burrow](=) and the Bengals offensive performance wasn’t that inspiring, and while [Daniel Jones]( was, [Saquon Barkley]() gives us big upside at a tougher position to fill. [Brock Purdy](), [Trevor Lawrence](, and [Dak Prescott]( generally don’t offer enough upside to take them seriously as choices, but we did just witness [Dak Prescott]( put up a legendary line on Monday night that plants the seed of a possibility of a [Jarrett Stidham](-esque performance in a win over San Francisco next week. Or you may think [Trevor Lawrence]( has pulled the sword from the stone and can beat [Patrick Mahomes II]( next week. Picking any of the three will give your lineup uniqueness, as will [Daniel Jones](. Burrow won’t be quite as unique and did make it to the Super Bowl last year, so if you think it was just the Ravens defense and Burrow and the Bengals offense will break out in Buffalo next week, consider Burrow. Quarterback is the highest-scoring position, so having a player who makes it to the Super Bowl is really important. If you think Buffalo is going to the Super Bowl, Allen is the pick here. If you think Philadelphia is going to the Super Bowl, [Jalen Hurts]() is the pick here. If you think Kansas City is going to the Super Bowl, and you think they will be playing someone other than Philadelphia (say, San Francisco), then [Patrick Mahomes II]( still might not be the pick. [Travis Kelce]( is the clear #1 tight end, and the FFPC scoring with 1.5 PPR increases his gap from the pack. He’ll be the chalk pick as the Chief in your lineup, and for good reason. For now, let’s assume we are going with Kelce at tight end. It’s certainly possible Mahomes outdistances QB2 by a larger margin than Kelce outdistances TE2, and we should be on the lookout for lineup diversity. Let’s leave this question for the tight end section, but if you have a line on a tight end who you think will make it to the Super Bowl and be a big reason why his team makes it, then that could open the door to a pairing with Mahomes to make a lower ownership percentage lineup. We’re down to Hurts and Allen. The tiebreakers for me are this Buffalo team having more recent playoff experience and Hurts not looking the same as when he played in Week 18 against the same Giants. I’ll go with [Josh Allen](=) knowing that if the Bills lose to Cincinnati, my ticket will be hurt more than if I went with the other strong Bills option - [Stefon Diggs]( - along with a quarterback that makes it to the Super Bowl. My Choice: [Josh Allen](=) Bottom Line: This is not a clear-cut choice. If you’re not feeling good about the Bills after the near miss against [Skylar Thompson](, [Stefon Diggs]( should be your Bills pick, not Allen. If you have a tight end up your sleeve that you think will have three big games, Mahomes makes sense. If you think Philadelphia has a significantly better chance of making the Super Bowl than Buffalo does, Hurts is the call. The same goes for the quarterbacks of any of the other five remaining teams (except San Francisco because McCaffrey is the 49ers' pick in any event). So if you have a strong feeling about Cincinnati, the Giants, Dallas, or Jacksonville, making a lineup with their quarterback will probably put you in a very small pool of potential winners. There should be a healthy amount of diversity in the second round because Allen doesn’t have the advantage of an extra possible game over Mahomes and Hurts that he had in the initial Playoff Challenge contest. [Footballguys Playoff Challenge 2: Divisional Round]() Running Back This is going to be the most boring position. [Christian McCaffrey](=) is a free square, and [Saquon Barkley]() probably is, too, after his big wild card game. We can rule out the Buffalo and Dallas committees right away. [Joe Mixon](, [Miles Sanders](=), and [Travis Etienne]() haven’t been consistent enough lately to merit a choice unless you have high confidence that their team is going to the Super Bowl. If you do, then putting one in over Barkley, who could be one and done, will give you lineup diversity. That leaves [Jerick McKinnon](. He’s certainly been hot enough to open up the possibility that he is RB1 if San Francisco doesn’t make it to the Super Bowl, and with a decent gap between him and any other running back. Maybe even enough to be larger than the gap between Mahomes/QB2 and Kelce/TE2. I can’t dismiss the possibility that McCaffrey/McKinnon is the combination on the winning ticket, but a lineup that has Kelce and a Super Bowl quarterback or Mahomes and a Super Bowl tight end with a strong postseason will probably be better off. My Choices: [Christian McCaffrey](=), [Saquon Barkley]() Bottom Line: McCaffrey will be almost universally used, and he should be. Don’t overthink it. [Jerick McKinnon]( could keep up his hot streak and be the right Chiefs choice, but that’s a long shot. Barkley is coming off of a strong game, and even as a player more likely to be one and done than his counterpart [Miles Sanders](=) or McKinnon, he’s an easy second choice because we have to put a Giant somewhere, and the opportunity cost of putting him here is lower than wide receiver or flex, which will have players with a higher weekly floor than any back not named McCaffrey or Barkley Wide Receiver I’ve eliminated Buffalo, but again, if you aren’t feeling the Bills as a Super Bowl team, [Stefon Diggs]( should be one of your choices here. I’m not feeling any heartburn about skipping over the 49ers and Giants wide receiver groups after taking their running back either. And no Chiefs receiver would give me pause before selecting Kelce at tight end, as I plan to. Of the remaining teams, [Ja'Marr Chase](=) and [A.J. Brown](=) are the most obvious choices. We don’t have to get too in-depth about the Jaguars or Cowboys choices at wide receiver because that’s where our flexes will come from. There’s a lineup diversity angle here by going with another Bengals or Eagles receiver. Higgins has outproduced Chase at times. But Burrow has leaned on Chase lately, so that’s probably overthinking it. Devonta Smith outproducing [A.J. Brown](=) is more plausible but still a clear underdog. My Choices: [Ja'Marr Chase](=), [A.J. Brown](=) Bottom Line: Even if you take the Bengals or Eagles quarterback, this isn’t too complicated; just swap in [Stefon Diggs](. There are other wide receivers worth considering, but they will just become one of your flexes. It’s not impossible that Smith > Brown or Higgins > Chase, but putting them in your lineup probably unnecessarily lengthens your odds. Tight End The winning lineup may have a tight end other than Kelce if the Jaguars can upset the Chiefs, or even in the less remote possibility that the Bills or Bengals do, but two games of Kelce is probably roughly equal to four [George Kittle](=), [Dallas Goedert](), or [Dalton Schultz]() games. So Kelce will likely lap the field if the Chiefs go to the Super Bowl, and as long as they beat the Jaguars, he probably won’t cede much, if anything, to the field at tight end, unlike Mahomes, who will likely be far behind any remaining quarterback that gets the equivalent of four games. My Choice: [Travis Kelce]( Bottom Line: Unless you think [George Kittle](=), [Dallas Goedert](), or maybe [Dalton Schultz]() or [Evan Engram]() are about to go on a historic postseason run to the Super Bowl, a la [Larry Fitzgerald](=), Kelce is the pick here. Flex The Dallas pick will come down to Lamb or [Dalton Schultz](). Lamb probably would have been the pick before the Cowboys win at Tampa, but Schultz leading the team in catches, yardage, and adding on two scores makes him too hot to pass on with the tight end premium scoring bump. Jacksonville comes down to [Christian Kirk](), who had a huge game in the regular season loss to the Chiefs, and [Evan Engram](), who was the top scorer among Jaguars pass-catchers last week, even without the tight end premium bump. My Choices: [Dalton Schultz](), [Christian Kirk]() Bottom Line: Your flex choices are simpler than QB/RB/WR/TE because you’re just picking your favorite to be the highest-scoring RB/WR/TE on the team for the remainder of the playoffs, and you don’t have to weigh teams chances of advancing in the decision. My Lineup QB - [Josh Allen](=) RB - [Christian McCaffrey](=), [Saquon Barkley]() WR - [A.J. Brown](=), [Ja'Marr Chase](=) TE - [Travis Kelce]( Flex - [Dalton Schultz](), [Christian Kirk]() How to Achieve Potentially Contest-Winning Lineup Diversity from My Chalky Lineup: QB - QB from Super Bowl team with Allen not making it RB - RB from Super Bowl team with Barkley getting shut down in loss to Eagles WR - Smith outproduces Brown TE - Just pick Kelce, don’t get cute with it Flex - Lamb outproduces Schultz, Engram outproduces Kirk [Footballguys Playoff Challenge 2: Divisional Round]() [Joe Bryant - Guide - Footballguys.com](=) Thank you for subscribing to our Footballguys Daily Update Email! You're subscribed as {EMAIL} To unsubscribe, click [here](. * Sportsguys * 118 N. Peters Rd., Suite 208 * Knoxville[,]( TN 37923 *

Marketing emails from footballguys.com

View More
Sent On

23/02/2024

Sent On

19/02/2024

Sent On

13/02/2024

Sent On

12/02/2024

Sent On

12/02/2024

Sent On

11/02/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.