Get The Draft Dominator Mobile App For FREE From Footballguys

[Footballguys.com]( FOOTBALLGUYS.COM SPECIAL OFFER --------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- Good Monday to you. I hope your week's shaping up to be productive / fun / awesome. I've got something I think you're going to love that will make it even better. The [Footballguys Draft Dominator Mobile App]( is FREE this year. That's right. The best drafting tool on the planet is now free. [Check it out.]( And here's the part you may not know. It's also the best MOCK DRAFT tool on the planet. I know a ton of you don't have your drafts until later this summer. That's cool. The best way to Dominate the August Draft is to Dominate Mock Drafts in July. So don't wait. Download the app and start mock drafting right now. It's seriously the best thing you can do to improve your drafting skill. My Buddy and Footballguys App Developer Simon Shepherd's made some short three minute videos for you as well. Here are the first two: Video 1 - Getting Started = Video 2 - Draft Basics = To Summarize. 1. Download the FREE Footballguys Draft Dominator Mobile App [HERE](. 2. Mock Draft your face off. 3. Dominate your real draft. Have a great week and thanks for being part of Footballguys. Also, check out this killer feature by our Dan Hindery. He lays out the fundamentals of Best Ball strategy. Enjoy. Peace, J --------------------------------------------------------------- Best Ball Roster Construction Building Winning Best Ball Rosters by Dan Hindery, June 30 On DRAFT, we have 18 picks and need those 18 players to fill 8 spots in our lineup every week (1 quarterback, 2 running backs, 3 wide receivers, 1 tight end, and 1 flex). When building our DRAFT best ball rosters, we don’t have to take a rigid, one-size-fits-all approach. Instead, we want to approach each draft with an open mind and enough flexibility to take advantage of wherever we can find the most value. While maintaining some flexibility is important, some lineup builds have proven most likely to lead to success. There are also some common sense minimums for each position that we should try to meet in all but the most extreme cases. Note: This article is targeted specifically to DRAFT but is applicable to best ball drafting on other sites as well. In Bestball10s, we have 20 picks but need to roster two defenses, so the roster math is identical. Roster building basics: 16+2 With the dual goals of maintaining draft flexibility and putting together a lineup built with the optimal positional totals, an approach we will call 16+2is a great rule of thumb. The optimal lineup build should hit the following minimum positional numbers: - Quarterback: 2 - Running Back 5 - Wide Receiver: 7 - Tight End 2 Below, we will go through position-by-position below to detail why these minimums make sense. You may notice the positional targets above add up to 16, which leaves us with two “free agent” picks. There is always a temptation to try to figure out the best roster construction and stick to it no matter what. However, the roster guidelines listed above are vague on purpose. We want to maintain flexibility in our approach for two main reasons: 1. We need to adjust our approach to account for draft capital spent. We should be adjusting our late-round strategy and positional targets to account for how we have drafted in the earlier rounds. What do we mean when we talk about draft capital? Let’s look at tight end as an example. We know we want at least two but deciding whether or not to take a third is tricky. We should strongly consider how early we selected our first two tight ends when deciding how much of a priority adding a third tight end with one of our two “free agent” picks is. If we have drafted [Travis Kelce]( and [Austin Hooper]( as our first two tight ends, we already have a ton of upside and a very high floor at the position. There should be better uses of our two free agent selections and we can stick with just two. On the other hand, if we have waited until round 10 or later to select our TE1, then the tight end position will be a prime candidate for one of our free agent selections and we should try to get three at the position as long as the board falls in a way that we don’t have to make a major reach to do so. The draft capital calculus is similar at other positions. If we have a Top-10 quarterback and drafted at Top-20 quarterback as our QB2, there are probably better uses for our free agent picks than adding a third quarterback. If we have gone especially heavy on either running back or wide receiver early in the draft, that should allow us the opportunity to use our free agent picks to bolster other areas. 2. We need to adjust our approach to allow for best-player-available. Given our roster, we may decide using one of our late-round picks on a TE3 would be a better idea than targeting an eighth wide receiver. However, if all of the decent TE3 options are gone when our pick rolls around and there are still some high-upside wide receivers available, we want to default to just taking the best player available. Always keep in mind that simply drafting good players trumps all else. We may feel that a 2-6-8-2 lineup build is our optimal configuration but we still have to have enough flexibility to detour slightly from our plan to try to capture as much value as we can depending upon how others are drafting With the basics of our approach in mind, let’s dive into the positional specifics. Quarterback: 2-3 Targeting at least two quarterbacks is a no-brainer. There is no good reason to take a zero at the position when our starter is on bye. Plus, the position is deep enough that we should be able to get a QB2 who will have at least a couple weeks better than our starter that will boost our total score. The only real question is whether to target two or three quarterbacks. The best answer — it depends. We should adjust our strategy depending on who our QB1 and QB2 are. In most cases, especially in tournaments, we probably do not want to draft a QB3. Assuming we have drafted a pair of solid starters, a third quarterback is not necessary to build a solid floor at the position. A third quarterback also does little to move the needle in terms of upside. Let’s take a close look at the 2018 results and dive into when it makes sense to draft three quarterbacks. Building a Floor at QB On average, the QB15 each week in 2018 (Weeks 1-16) posted a score of 17.8 DRAFT points. We can use this number as our baseline weekly minimum-scoring target and consider those good fantasy weeks. We will also take a look at how many times each quarterback posted a score of at least 15 points, which we will call “solid” production for that given week. Rank Player Team R+ (weeks with 17.8 or more) Usable (weeks of 15+) 1 [Patrick Mahomes II]( KCC 15 15 2 Ben Roethlisberger PIT 12 13 3 [Matt Ryan]( ATL 11 11 4 Andrew Luck IND 11 11 5 Cam Newton CAR 11 12 6 Russell Wilson SEA 11 13 7 Deshaun Watson HOU 10 11 8 Aaron Rodgers GBP 9 13 9 Philip Rivers LAC 9 13 10 [Kirk Cousins]( MIN 8 10 11 Carson Wentz PHI 8 8 12 [Drew Brees]( NOS 7 10 13 Jared Goff LAR 7 11 14 Tom Brady NEP 7 10 15 Mitchell Trubisky CHI 6 7 16 Baker Mayfield CLE 6 8 17 Dak Prescott DAL 6 8 18 Eli Manning NYG 6 7 19 [Ryan Fitzpatrick]( TBB 5 6 20 [Jameis Winston]( TBB 5 6 21 [Andy Dalton]( CIN 5 7 22 Josh Allen BUF 5 5 23 Blake Bortles JAC 5 5 24 Joe Flacco BAL 4 5 25 [Derek Carr]( OAK 4 7 The first thing that jumps out is how many good (17.8+) and solid (15+) weeks the top quarterbacks had. [Patrick Mahomes II]( put up at least 17.8 points every single game last year. You would have only needed your QB2 to cover for his bye week to have hit the minimum target every single week over the 16-week fantasy season. Six other quarterbacks put up 17.8 points or more in at least 10 of their 15 outings. Plus, [Jameis Winston]( and [Ryan Fitzpatrick]( combined to hit this total 13 times for the Buccaneers. The other nice thing about the quarterback position is that even when the top guys don’t quite hit 17.8 points, they usually don’t miss it by much. If we lower our weekly minimum target to 15 points, we see that 13 quarterbacks managed to hit this mark at least 10 times. The top-12 quarterbacks averaged 11.7 good fantasy weeks (not counting Week 17). In short, if you make even an average QB1 selection, you should have most of your weeks covered with solid starting production. When we also include a QB2, we can feel really good about our weekly floor at the position. The average QB2 in during the 2018 fantasy season produced 7.1 weeks of at least 15 fantasy points. You can build a floor at the position which should allow you to score at least 15 points almost every single week with just two quarterbacks. Upside at Quarterback Overall Rank Player Team Value+ 13 [Patrick Mahomes II]( KCC 142.7 36 [Matt Ryan]( ATL 87.2 38 [Drew Brees]( NOS 86.5 41 Deshaun Watson HOU 83.6 42 Ben Roethlisberger PIT 83.5 50 Mitchell Trubisky CHI 74.3 51 Andrew Luck IND 73.6 54 Jared Goff LAR 70.6 58 Cam Newton CAR 64.4 61 Aaron Rodgers GBP 61.6 71 [Ryan Fitzpatrick]( TBB 57.0 81 Russell Wilson SEA 51.5 84 [Kirk Cousins]( MIN 50.0 111 Tom Brady NEP 38.5 112 Philip Rivers LAC 38.5 116 Dak Prescott DAL 36.8 118 Blake Bortles JAC 35.8 125 Josh Allen BUF 34.9 132 [Derek Carr]( OAK 32.1 134 [Jameis Winston]( TBB 31.7 146 Carson Wentz PHI 28.0 155 Baker Mayfield CLE 25.5 173 [Andy Dalton]( CIN 21.0 195 Sam Darnold NYJ 14.9 197 Eli Manning NYG 14.6 We know we don’t need to draft a QB3 to lock in a solid floor at the position, so the next line of inquiry is how much a QB3 adds to our upside. I picked a number of random QB1-QB2 pairings from last season and checked to see how many total points would have been added when various third quarterbacks were added to the mix. In testing dozens of combinations of two and three quarterback pairings, the addition of a third quarterback to the mix added anywhere from 0 to 40 points. On the low end, [Andy Dalton]( only added 8.4 points to the season scoring total when added as the QB3 behind Mitch Trubisky and [Kirk Cousins](. On the high end, [Derek Carr](’s big weeks coincided perfectly with [Drew Brees]( and [Matt Ryan](’s bad weeks and he added 39.2 points to the season total as the QB3. In most cases, drafting a third quarterback will add modestly to season-long point totals. It is not a bad use of a late-round pick. However, to roster a QB3, you are passing out on the smaller chance for much higher upside at another position. A mid-to-late round QB3 is not going to be nearly as impactful as a big-play wide receiver who posts a few big weeks (Desean Jackson), a backup running back who lands a featured role at some point during the season ([Nick Chubb](), or a tight end who has a breakout season ([Jared Cook](). Running Back: 5-6 There isn’t a more impactful player in the best ball format than an elite running back. After adjusting for replacement level production at each position, the five most valuable best ball performers on DRAFT last season were running backs [Todd Gurley](, [Christian McCaffrey](, [Saquon Barkley](, [Alvin Kamara](, and [Ezekiel Elliott](. It isn’t a surprise to see four of the five now going off the board at the top of the first round and only injury concerns are keeping Gurley from being a high first-rounder as well. Considering injuries, bye weeks, and the uncertainty surrounding many backfields, it is a good idea to draft at least five running backs to ensure solid weekly production from the position. Loading up at running back is also prudent because it is the position where even later round picks can have serious upside. Especially in bigger tournaments where you want to build in as much upside as possible, using one of our free-agent picks to draft a sixth running back is an attractive, high upside option. Overall Rank Player Team Value + Weeks 1 [Todd Gurley]( LAR 237.8 13 2 [Christian McCaffrey]( CAR 215.0 15 3 [Saquon Barkley]( NYG 205.6 15 4 [Alvin Kamara]( NOS 203.3 14 5 [Ezekiel Elliott]( DAL 180.4 14 8 Melvin Gordon LAC 159.9 11 10 [James Conner]( PIT 151.6 12 18 Kareem Hunt CLE 137.3 10 20 Joe Mixon CIN 114.1 12 21 James White NEP 113.1 12 29 David Johnson ARI 100.7 14 30 [Phillip Lindsay]( DEN 100.2 12 33 [Nick Chubb]( CLE 99.7 10 34 Tarik Cohen CHI 95.9 10 35 Derrick Henry TEN 93.7 7 40 Chris Carson SEA 84.8 9 44 [Aaron Jones]( GBP 81.4 7 45 [Adrian Peterson]( WAS 79.7 10 46 [Marlon Mack]( IND 77.6 8 52 Kenyan Drake MIA 73.5 9 56 Tevin Coleman ATL 67.9 11 59 Matt Breida SFO 64.2 8 62 Dalvin Cook MIN 61.5 8 64 Lamar Miller HOU 61.0 10 67 Sony Michel NEP 58.9 5 68 T.J. Yeldon JAC 58.3 10 74 Isaiah Crowell NYJ 55.8 5 76 Leonard Fournette JAC 55.8 5 77 Mark Ingram NOS 55.6 8 78 Austin Ekeler LAC 52.3 8 79 Kerryon Johnson DET 52.3 8 82 Jordan Howard CHI 51.0 10 86 Latavius Murray MIN 48.1 5 93 Mike Davis SEA 46.0 5 98 Peyton Barber TBB 43.8 6 100 Damien Williams KCC 43.3 3 108 Dion Lewis TEN 39.9 7 121 Wendell Smallwood PHI 35.5 4 126 Duke Johnson CLE 34.3 5 128 Carlos Hyde JAC 33.2 5 130 Nyheim Hines IND 32.7 7 133 LeSean McCoy BUF 31.7 6 139 Gus Edwards BAL 29.4 5 141 Jamaal Williams GBP 29.1 4 142 Marshawn Lynch OAK 29.0 4 143 Alex Collins BAL 28.8 7 144 Elijah McGuire NYJ 28.6 4 147 Jaylen Samuels PIT 27.7 5 148 Doug Martin OAK 27.3 6 150 Jalen Richard OAK 26.5 10 152 Giovani Bernard CIN 25.8 3 154 LeGarrette Blount DET 25.5 3 158 Chris Thompson WAS 24.3 3 167 Corey Clement PHI 22.4 5 171 Javorius Allen BAL 21.3 5 178 Frank Gore MIA 19.1 5 182 Josh Adams PHI 18.4 4 183 Spencer Ware KCC 17.9 5 192 Royce Freeman DEN 15.5 5 Building a Floor at Running Back With the running back position also heavily impacting scoring at the flex position, we used the weekly average of the RB32 to determine replacement-level production (7.5 points). The good news is that 18 running backs hit this benchmark at least 10 times. [Saquon Barkley]( and [Christian McCaffrey]( topped this total in every single game they played last season. Building a solid weekly floor at running back is not as difficult as one might think if you can land at least one legitimate RB1 early in the draft. If you start RB-RB, it isn’t unrealistic to think you can cover 75% of your RB1 and RB2 starts for the entire season. You do not need to draft six or seven running backs to give yourself a strong weekly floor as long as you have drafted the right guys. Upside at Running Back The biggest reason to target at least five running backs is the unmatched upside in the later rounds if one of your picks hits. Running back is the one position where we regularly see later round picks have huge seasons. For example, [James Conner]( was one of the most valuable players on DRAFT last season and was available in the final rounds for almost the entire offseason. [Phillip Lindsay](, [Nick Chubb](, [Aaron Jones](, [Adrian Peterson](, and [Marlon Mack]( each put up at least 75 points above replacement level last season and were also available in the 9th-round or later for much or all of the offseason. At wide receiver, only two late-rounders achieved that type of production ([Tyler Boyd]( and [Calvin Ridley]() and neither were nearly as impactful as Conner. Due to the outsized impact of the elite backs and the unmatched upside available later in the draft, we want to draft running backs early and often to maximize our chances of putting up big weekly scores at the position. Late-round running back picks are especially attractive in bigger tournaments. In this format, you are looking to build a top 0.1% type of team. One of the easiest ways to do so is to hit on your early picks and also strike gold with a late-round running back. Wide Receiver: 7-8 It is hard to build either a consistent floor or significant upside at the wide receiver without at least one legitimate WR1 and history has shown those players are almost always drafted near the top of the draft. The top wide receivers also boast impressive consistency and make it easy to build a floor at the position. Compared to other positions, it is much harder to hit a home run in the later rounds at wide receiver. A realistic goal for these late-round picks is to land a player capable of at least a few big weeks that will boost your total team scoring by 30-60 points overall. Due to the depth at the position, this is not too difficult to achieve, which makes wide receiver an important position at which to build up as much as possible. Overall Rank Player Team Value + Weeks 6 Davante Adams GBP 161.6 15 7 Antonio Brown PIT 160.7 14 11 Tyreek Hill KCC 150.2 12 12 DeAndre Hopkins HOU 142.8 15 15 Michael Thomas NOS 138.6 12 16 Adam Thielen MIN 137.7 14 17 Julio Jones ATL 137.3 14 19 JuJu Smith-Schuster PIT 120.4 13 22 Mike Evans TBB 110.3 12 24 [Robert Woods]( LAR 108.3 14 26 Odell Beckham NYG 102.3 10 27 Stefon Diggs MIN 102.2 10 28 Keenan Allen LAC 101.8 13 31 Amari Cooper DAL 100.0 7 32 T.Y. Hilton IND 100.0 11 37 [Tyler Boyd]( CIN 86.7 10 43 Brandin Cooks LAR 82.5 12 47 Emmanuel Sanders DEN 76.7 10 48 [Calvin Ridley]( ATL 76.7 6 49 Kenny Golladay DET 75.8 10 53 Tyler Lockett SEA 72.2 13 55 Julian Edelman NEP 70.1 10 57 A.J. Green CIN 65.2 8 60 [Cooper Kupp]( LAR 62.5 6 63 Mike Williams]( LAC 61.2 7 65 Alshon Jeffery PHI 60.9 6 66 Jarvis Landry CLE 60.4 11 70 Robby Anderson NYJ 57.2 5 72 Golden Tate PHI 56.7 7 73 Corey Davis TEN 56.7 7 75 [DeSean Jackson]( TBB 55.8 7 85 Adam Humphries TBB 49.6 7 88 Sterling Shepard NYG 47.2 7 89 John Brown BAL 47.2 7 91 Jordy Nelson OAK 46.7 7 92 Will Fuller HOU 46.0 5 94 Dede Westbrook JAC 45.5 8 95 Doug {NAME} SEA 44.5 6 96 Larry Fitzgerald ARI 44.4 9 99 Kenny Stills MIA 43.4 4 101 Sammy Watkins KCC 42.9 6 102 Chris Godwin TBB 42.5 7 103 Allen Robinson CHI 42.2 7 104 Dante Pettis SFO 41.7 5 105 D.J. Moore CAR 40.6 7 106 Mohamed Sanu ATL 40.1 8 107 [Albert Wilson]( MIA 40.0 3 109 [Zay Jones]( BUF 39.2 5 110 Josh Gordon NEP 38.7 8 113 Demaryius Thomas HOU 38.1 7 114 Tre'Quan Smith NOS 38.1 3 120 [David Moore]( SEA 35.7 5 122 Tyrell Williams LAC 35.5 6 123 Marvin Jones DET 35.1 4 127 Curtis Samuel CAR 33.9 8 129 Nelson Agholor PHI 32.9 7 131 Donte Moncrief JAC 32.3 5 136 Robert Foster BUF 31.1 4 137 Christian Kirk ARI 30.8 6 138 Taylor Gabriel CHI 30.1 4 145 Marquise Goodwin SFO 28.3 4 149 Devin Funchess CAR 27.0 4 153 Anthony Miller CHI 25.6 7 157 Antonio Callaway CLE 25.0 5 159 Cole Beasley DAL 24.1 4 160 Courtland Sutton DEN 23.7 6 161 Marquez Valdes-Scantling GBP 23.7 5 162 Chester Rogers IND 23.5 4 163 Rashard Higgins CLE 23.2 5 164 Michael Crabtree BAL 23.1 7 166 Randall Cobb GBP 22.5 2 169 Josh Reynolds LAR 21.5 3 175 Chris Hogan NEP 20.6 4 176 Geronimo Allison GBP 20.4 4 177 Danny Amendola MIA 19.9 4 181 Chris Conley KCC 18.7 3 185 Cordarrelle Patterson NEP 17.5 4 187 Aldrick Robinson MIN 17.0 4 188 Quincy Enunwa NYJ 16.1 5 189 Jamison Crowder WAS 16.0 3 190 Michael Gallup DAL 16.0 3 193 Keelan Cole JAC 15.1 2 194 Zach Pascal IND 14.9 2 196 Jaron Brown SEA 14.7 2 198 Phillip Dorsett NEP 14.6 2 199 Jermaine Kearse NYJ 14.5 2 200 John Ross CIN 14.0 5 Building a Floor at Wide Receiver The weekly WR42 scored almost identically to our replacement level running back, averaging just over 7.5 points per game. Using that number for replacement-level production, we notice some glaring trends. First, the elite wide receivers hit this mark almost every single week. The top-10 wide receivers each put up at least replacement-level production in 12+ games. In total, 21 wide receivers put up at least 10 games of replacement-level production. If you use at least two picks in the first handful of rounds at wide receiver and hit on those picks, you should have a big chunk of your weeks covered with at least replacement level production. Upside at Wide Receiver It is difficult to build serious upside at wide receiver in best ball if you don’t address the position at least twice in the first five rounds. Only 14 wide receivers scored 100+ points above replacement-level last season. Of this elite group of performers, only [Robert Woods]( finished with an ADP outside of the first four rounds. While it is difficult to consistently put up big scores at wide receiver without at least one elite option, it is not impossible. For example, [Cooper Kupp]( and Mike Williams]( combined gave you the equivalent of a low-end WR1, with the best weeks between the two scoring 109.5 points above replacement. While it is hard to strike gold in the late rounds with a player who makes a huge impact, it is not difficult to find wide receivers late who can still provide a solid boost to your point totals. Players who have some big-play ability or who are red zone threats are especially strong options to build in some weekly upside in the later rounds. [Albert Wilson](, [Zay Jones](, TreQuan Smith, and [David Moore]( each were able to provide 35+ points of value last season on the strength of a couple of big weeks. Having a good number of backups capable of contributing at least a few big weekly totals is key to building a high-scoring best ball team. Tight End: 2-3 As with quarterback, drafting at least two at the tight end position is a no-brainer. Even if you draft an elite tight end, you will want to have a fill-in for his bye week. Tight end is also a position where injuries occur regularly. Last season, [Rob Gronkowski](, [Hunter Henry](, [Evan Engram](, [O.J. Howard](, [Jordan Reed](, [Greg Olsen](, and [Tyler Eifert]( each missed multiple games. Drafting three tight ends is a strong option in many situations. The problem is that supply does not meet demand. Less than 20 tight ends averaged more than 5.0 DRAFT points per game. If you are on the clock in the later rounds and there is a tight end you believe in still available, you should probably pull the trigger. You should not try to force it, however. Drafting somebody who is only going to score 60 points all season isn’t going to do you much good and it doesn’t make sense to pass on better players at other positions simply to meet a positional target. Building a Floor at Tight End Tight End is easily the most difficult position at which to build a floor at. As noted above, less than 20 qualified tight ends scored more than 5.0 points per game last season. The average score of the TE15 each week during 2018 was just over 5.5 points per game. Replacement level production at the position is a low bar to clear. However, despite the low bar, it is notable how few players were able to clear it with any regularity last season. Only eight players were able to post 9+ games of 5.5 DRAFT points or more. Only 19 tight ends posted 6+ games of 5.5 points or more. There are two realistic paths to building a consistent floor at tight end. First, you could draft an elite tight end. The top 6 last season each posted at least 10 replacement level games and the three elite tight ends each posted 13 or more such games. If you were lucky enough to draft one of this trio, you were pretty much set every week. The second path to building a consistent floor at tight end was to hit on at least a two later-round picks — a task made much more difficult by all of the injuries at the position. Upside at Tight End The top tight ends were so far ahead of the pack that [Travis Kelce]( alone scored almost as many points over the 16 week fantasy season (234.4) as you would have scored combined had you rostered the TE5, TE6, and TE7 (238.6 points). In short, it is extremely difficult to match the upside of the elite tight ends simply by hitting on multiple lower-tier TE1s. However, it is worth noting that he “Big 3” at tight end — [Travis Kelce](, [Zach Ertz](, and [George Kittle]( — each had historic seasons last year. While their value was huge, banking on them being able to do it again may be unwise. Of the trio, Kelce seems most likely to repeat. Ertz and Kittle both face increased competition for targets. Overall Rank Player Team Value + Weeks 9 [Travis Kelce]( KCC 156.3 14 14 [Zach Ertz]( PHI 141.6 13 23 [George Kittle]( SFO 109.6 13 25 Eric Ebron IND 104.5 11 39 [Jared Cook]( OAK 85.0 10 69 [O.J. Howard]( TBB 57.5 8 80 Trey Burton CHI 52.1 8 83 [Rob Gronkowski]( NEP 50.6 8 87 [Austin Hooper]( ATL 47.7 10 90 Kyle Rudolph MIN 47.0 9 97 David Njoku CLE 44.2 7 115 [Evan Engram]( NYG 37.9 7 117 Jimmy Graham GBP 36.6 7 119 Chris Herndon NYJ 35.8 7 124 Vance McDonald PIT 35.0 8 135 [Jordan Reed]( WAS 31.4 8 140 Dallas Goedert PHI 29.2 4 151 Cameron Brate TBB 26.1 5 156 [Greg Olsen]( CAR 25.4 6 165 Vernon Davis WAS 22.9 5 168 Gerald Everett LAR 21.7 5 170 Jesse James PIT 21.4 4 172 Ben Watson NOS 21.0 4 174 Mark Andrews BAL 20.8 7 179 Jordan Thomas HOU 19.1 4 180 C.J. Uzomah CIN 18.8 8 184 Antonio Gates LAC 17.6 4 186 Jeff Heuerman DEN 17.4 3 191 Ian Thomas CAR 15.6 3 --------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for subscribing to our Footballguys Daily Update Email! Get your 3 Free Downloads [here](=). You are currently subscribed as {EMAIL} To unsubscribe, click [here](. * Footballguys.com * PO Box 937 * Cabot, AR 72023-0937 * News Items Powered By: =