Newsletter Subject

The most interesting Yandex leak takeaway for me

From

fatstacksblog.com

Email Address

info@fatstacksblog.com

Sent On

Thu, Feb 9, 2023 08:33 PM

Email Preheader Text

I didn't pay much attention to the Yandex leak media blitz when it happened. I figured I'd let the S

I didn't pay much attention to the Yandex leak media blitz when it happened. I figured I'd let the SEOs geek out over it then write their findings in a way a grade fiver could read it. Now that the dust has settled, that's exactly what's happened. I read about three articles setting out the findings. I guess there were not a whole lot of surprises except for one (for me). It's not really a surprise but it sheds more light on how Google possibly treats this "SEO tip". --------------------------------------------------------------- -TODAY'S PROMOTION- FREE EVENT: The SEO Reborn Summit ​[Join this online event]( to learn from 14 SEO experts their secrets of leveraging A.I. for SEO. Timely topics: - AI content generation - Training your own AI to unleash its potential - AI in the SEO agency context - AI and local SEO The lineup of speakers is impressive. See them [here](. => [Click here to learn more (it's free)](​ -END PROMOTION- DISCLAIMER: The links promoting this summit are affiliate links. It's a free event but recordings may be sold down the road hence I used an affiliate link. --------------------------------------------------------------- Just so I'm clear, I don't optimize for Yandex. Until the leak, I didn't know Yandex existing; kinda like how I didn't know Bing existed until all the ChatGPT hullabaloo. The big deal about the leak is many suspect that Google's algo is similar. I don't think that's a stretch at all. What's my favorite takeaway? That Yandex takes into account non-search traffic when ranking sites. I've long suspected search engines did that. It makes sense but it's doubly interesting to see that it is indeed a ranking factor for Yandex. That does NOT mean it's a Google ranking factor. We can't assume Google's algo is identical. We can only infer. The other significant factor to keep in mind here is how much of a ranking factor is it. Probably not significant, but I don't know. It's one of many. I doubt it's not close to how much weight inbound links have for ranking. Why do I find this particular ranking factor so interesting? It's simple. It's one factor I have control over. Moreover, short of blasting bot and bad traffic to my sites, it's something I can do with exuberant gusto that won't hurt my sites. In fact, it'll help. ​[The SEJ article]( I read suggests paid traffic helps. That's interesting. I certainly wouldn't run paid traffic at a loss but if breaking even could be worth it. Something important to keep in mind here I assume that quality traffic is key. Don't go buy some lousy 100K visitor junk traffic package for $5 thinking this will help your SEO. Also, there is no guarantee that diversifying your traffic will help rankings. Just because you get traffic from multiple sources does NOT mean you will rank higher. It's one of many factors. What implications does this have for me? It reinforces my efforts to diversify traffic even if those other sources are not as plentiful. In other words, if I can get 5% more traffic from another source, while that might not do much to overall revenue and is likely a hassle, there are benefits beyond the direct revenue. The potential collateral benefit is better rankings. What am I doing about it? I've long pursued multiple traffic sources for my main site. Mainly Facebook, Pinterest (resuming after long hiatus) and email. I'm hit and miss with email. Some weeks I'm consistent. Other weeks I don't do it. Yeah, this is a cardinal sin of email newsletters. Consistency is key. Big fail for me there but I am now trying to be more consistent. What this Yandex leak motivates me to do is double down on more Facebook, Pinterest and email traffic. I'm even posting to IG and Twitter once a day as well. I've actually grown my IG follower account but engagement isn't great. I'll be more diligent sending more emails to my niche audiences even if it's not generating all the direct revenue I would like. Am I acting on any other Yandex ranking factors? The only additional action I'm taking is some HARO campaigns for my new local business website. Not a big campaign; just something to get the wheels spinning. I would have done this anyway so it's not really acting on the leak. Thanks for reading. Jon Fatstacksblog.com [Unsubscribe]( | [Update your profile]( | 2016 Hill Drive, North Vancouver, British Columbia V7H 2N5

Marketing emails from fatstacksblog.com

View More
Sent On

23/06/2023

Sent On

18/06/2023

Sent On

16/06/2023

Sent On

15/06/2023

Sent On

13/06/2023

Sent On

12/06/2023

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.