Newsletter Subject

What can you do "when" you receive horrible content from a writer?

From

fatstacksblog.com

Email Address

info@fatstacksblog.com

Sent On

Fri, Feb 4, 2022 11:18 PM

Email Preheader Text

If you order enough content, eventually you’re going to receive junk. I sure have over the years. That’s why I put “when” in the subject of this email instead of "If". To this day I get choked when I get it. You’d think I’d learn by now that now and then I’ll get garbage. --------------------------------------------------------------- -PAID AD- ​ €‹ Best Marketplace For Premium Aged Domains​ ​ Odys Global is the leading marketplace for premium-aged domains, chosen by top SEO experts and business owners. In comparison to other domain providers, Odys offers unparalleled advantages such as: - High authority domains with built-in SEO - Consulting on SEO, tech, and growth strategy - Dedicated support ready to handle any issue ​ ​[Get access](to all of these benefits by becoming an Odys member today! -END OF PAID AD- --------------------------------------------------------------- What are your options when you receive badly written content from writers? ​ ​Your options really boil down to the content source you use. In-house writers ​ ​You can ask them to rewrite it. If an unproven writer, you might decide to suck it up, write it yourself and fire them. I always give writers one more go but if it’s not good after that, I have no choice but to let them go. I currently have about 20 draft articles across my sites from in-house writers I hired on a trial basis that aren’t good enough to publish. I haven’t gotten around to sprucing them up. Which leads me to step two and that is to roll up your sleeves and make it worthy of your site. What I dislike about editing is sometimes it takes longer than writing a topic from scratch. Sometimes an article appears to be an easy fix and three hours later it’s still not done. Been there. Done that. Another option is to send the piece of junk to another in-house writer and ask them to fix it. The problem with this of course, is you’re going to pay twice for the same article. A third option is to publish it as a piece of junk and hope for the best. If it ranks, it won’t be the first piece of junk that ranks and gets traffic. I’m not particularly fond of this option but I’ve done it especially on some of my lesser sites (which maybe explains why they’re lesser sites). Lastly, you can toss it in the garbage bin and chalk it up as a cost of doing business. Content services ​ ​An example of a content services is [Passion Posts]( (save 10% with coupon BWMZ0ZXDWK). They have their own cadre of writers. You just pay the service and give them topics. They handle the rest. One nice perk we enjoy from content services is that most offer revisions. I know PassionPosts and Content Development Pros offer revisions. In fact, the one thing content services can offer that even agencies can’t (unless you beg) is if the revision is junk, the service will assign it to another writer. Most services are keen to ensure you’re satisfied (assuming your expectations are in line with the rate you paid. You can’t expect expert-level content when you pay for the lowest quality tier). I’ve often requested revisions from content services and they’ve never balked at improving it. Content agencies (self-serve platforms) ​ ​An example of a content agency is [WriterAccess.](=) It’s a self-serve platform. You sign up. Submit your article orders. A large pool of writers snags those orders. Unless you send them directly to individual writers, you don’t know who will pick the orders up. It’s a bit of a crapshoot (which is why it’s a good idea to start assembling love and block lists immediately). If the article you receive is badly done, you can request a revision. The problem with this process is it goes back to the same writer. They get a second chance. If they can’t write, they ain’t gonna deliver something good the second time. I’ve had this happen a few times. What I do in these situations is I contact the agency and ask that it be assigned to another writer. So far they’ve accommodated me as long as the original writer got a second kick at the can. My guess is this can’t be abused. If you’re asking for assignments to be reassigned all the time, I’m pretty sure the agency will eventually decline your request. I use this “nuke” option sparingly. TIP: if you get garbage from a writer, add them to a block list so they can’t pick up orders in the future. Every order delivered to me, I assess whether to add that writer to my love list or block list. The more I finetune my account, the better quality I consistently get. What if you approve articles and then realize there are problems? ​ ​I’ve had this happen as well. Sometimes I can be a little trigger happy with the approval button especially when I’m pressed for time and have many articles delivered that need approval. If it’s a content service, they’ll usually take it back and improve it. Again, this is one perk of using content services (with its own cadre of in-house writers). If it’s a content agency like WriterAccess, if I catch my mistake quickly, I’ll ask the writer if they could fix it and if they agree, I ask the agency to send it back to the writer. If it’s been a week or longer, I deal with it which means I fix it. Regarding revisions generally, if it’s something minor, I’ll fix it myself. The revision process takes time. If fixing is faster than my time spent going through the revision process, I’ll just fix it myself or ask an in-house writer to fix it. If the long-after deliver problems are spotted from an in-house writer, then it’s easy. Just ask them to go in and fix it (unless it’s faster to fix it yourself than asking someone else to do it). This is why I use all three types of content sources ​ ​Each type of content source has pros and cons which is why I use all three. Some months I use [WriterAccess](=) mostly. Other months I use [Passion Posts](=) (save 10% with coupon BWMZ0ZXDWK) extensively. Some months most of my content is from in-house writers. Some months it’s all three. A final note about Passion Posts and WriterAccess Passion Posts delivers excellent quality but it takes a long time to receive your articles. A very long time. Weeks. Could be well over a month. WriterAccess is more hit and miss with quality (unless you have a developed love list of your favorite writers). The plus side is you can get hundreds of articles delivered inside a week. Please take note of these pros and cons. Jon Fatstacksblog.com ​ --------------------------------------------------------------- PAID ADS: Please note that this newsletter contains a PAID AD in it. It's a sponsored ad. It is marked with PAID AD above and END PAID AD at the bottom. It is NOT an endorsement by me or Fat Stacks. The advertiser paid to advertise in the spot. => [Join the Fat Stacks Forum](​ ​ =>[My favorite blogging tools and software](​ ​ ADVERTISE YOUR BUSINESS: Do you want to advertise in this "high engagement" email newsletter? [See the Media Kit here](). Great for promoting blogging services, software, websites for sale... anything to do with blogging. ​ ​[YouTube]() | [Blog]() | [Facebook]() | [Twitter](​ ​ Podcast:​ ​[iTunes]() | [Stitcher]() | [Spotify](=)​ ​ Affiliate disclaimer: I usually put a lot of effort into these emails. I know, I know, it may not always seem like it, but I try. In an effort to make a few bucks for my effort, I often link to various products and courses. Assume these links are affiliate links. If you choose to click and buy, THANK YOU. It makes this thing possible. ​ [Unsubscribe]( | [Update your profile]( | 2016 Hill Drive, North Vancouver, British Columbia V7H 2N5

Marketing emails from fatstacksblog.com

View More
Sent On

23/06/2023

Sent On

18/06/2023

Sent On

16/06/2023

Sent On

15/06/2023

Sent On

13/06/2023

Sent On

12/06/2023

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.