Newsletter Subject

Toxic voting records

From

ewgactionfund.com

Email Address

info@ewgactionfund.com

Sent On

Wed, Sep 19, 2018 04:54 PM

Email Preheader Text

There is a lot of attention on the upcoming midterm election?with good reason. Our representatives

There is a lot of attention on the upcoming midterm election—with good reason. Our representatives in Washington make decisions that have a big impact on our health and wellbeing. And, the truth is, , that many of these votes aren’t covered by the media. [EWG Action Fund]( Dear Friend, There is a lot of attention on the upcoming midterm election—with good reason. Our representatives in Washington make decisions that have a big impact on our health and wellbeing. And, the truth is, Friend, that many of these votes aren’t covered by the media. In the past three years, Congress has reversed or delayed chemical bans, gutted chemical safety rules, rejected sound science, weakened worker and consumer protections, and denied justice to asbestos victims. But many representatives are hoping to hide their toxic voting records. Here at EWG Action Fund, we think you deserve to know the truth about these votes. EWG Action Fund went through and examined the voting record of every member of the U.S. House of Representatives and created a toxic chemical policy scorecard so you can know where your member stands. [Click here to view EWG Action Fund’s Toxic Chemical Policy Scorecard.]( This is the first time there has been a scorecard focused solely on chemicals and your health. Here is how to read the scorecard: - The scorecard is organized alphabetically by state and then numerically by congressional district. - Next to the representative’s name, we have listed 17 bills and indicated when the representative voted to strengthen (green checkmark) or weaken (red x-mark) policy related to chemicals in the environment. - We calculated the percentage of their votes that were pro-environment and gave each member a score. The higher the score, the more they voted to protect our environment and health. You can learn more about the different bills [here.]( Thanks, - EWG Action Fund [P.S. The most important thing you can do this year is exercise your right to vote. Can we count on you to turn out? Click here and pledge to vote!]( [Contribute]( [UNSUBSCRIBE]( | [CHANGE OPTIONS]( Remember to add info@ewgactionfund.com to your contact list. EWG Action Fund is a 501(c)(4) organization that is a separate sister organization of the Environmental Working Group. The mission of EWG Action Fund is to protect health and the environment by educating the public and lobbying on a wide range of environmental issues. Donations to EWG Action Fund are not tax-deductible. [Contact Us](mailto:info@ewgactionfund.com) | Copyright 2018, EWG Action Fund. All Rights Reserved.

Marketing emails from ewgactionfund.com

View More
Sent On

22/10/2018

Sent On

24/09/2018

Sent On

17/09/2018

Sent On

20/06/2018

Sent On

17/05/2018

Sent On

14/05/2018

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.