Newsletter Subject

Programmatic Bidding Flawed: $6.6B Wasted Spend

From

emarketer.com

Email Address

fyi@emarketer.com

Sent On

Mon, Aug 7, 2023 04:02 PM

Email Preheader Text

The costly implications of bid shading. - "eMarketer FYI" is part of your subscription to the eMarke

The costly implications of bid shading. - "eMarketer FYI" is part of your subscription to the eMarketer Daily Newsletter. Trouble viewing? [View in browser](. --------------------------------------------------------------- In their research study, Cognitiv found that bid shading, a pervasive practice meant to optimize programmatic spending, is not well understood by most media buyers and may be costing US advertisers $6.6B per year. [In the report](), Cognitiv explores: - The vast knowledge gaps digital media buyers have surrounding bid shading - The performance pitfalls and costly implications of current bidding solutions - Intelligent Bidding: an innovative solution designed by media buyers for advertisers Explore the research findings and the solution that is evolving modern media buying. [Download the Report]() See what the brain behind the brands can do for you. [Subscribe]() • [Contact]() Us Cognitiv, 25 W 39th Street, 10th Floor, New York, NY 10018 --------------------------------------------------------------- eMarketer FYI sponsored mailings are strictly controlled and distributed by Insider Intelligence. © 2023 [Insider Intelligence]() 11 Times Square, New York, NY 10036 | 800-405-0844 [Unsubscribe & Manage Preferences]() | [Privacy Policy]()

Marketing emails from emarketer.com

View More
Sent On

20/12/2023

Sent On

19/12/2023

Sent On

19/12/2023

Sent On

18/12/2023

Sent On

18/12/2023

Sent On

18/12/2023

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.