Newsletter Subject

The Silicon Valley Bank Story the Media ISN'T Telling You

From

crowdability.com

Email Address

newsletter@exct.moneyballeconomics.com

Sent On

Tue, Mar 14, 2023 04:01 PM

Email Preheader Text

You're receiving this email as part of your subscription to Andrew Zatlin's Moneyball Daily ADVERTIS

You're receiving this email as part of your subscription to Andrew Zatlin's Moneyball Daily [Unsubscribe]( [Moneyball Economics] The Silicon Valley Bank Story the Media ISN'T Telling You Tuesday, March 14, 2023 Two of America's biggest banks just went belly up. The thing is, there are two sides to this story... The one you'll hear about in the mainstream press, and the one I'm about to share with you. [CLICK HERE TO LAUNCH VIDEO OR READ THE FULL TRANSCRIPT BELOW »»]( ADVERTISEMENT GOING OFFLINE: Wall Street Legend's No. 1 AI Stock for 2023 new technology has emerged that could change the world forever. Forbes calls it "one of the great transformational technologies of the 21st century." And the New York Times says it has "set off a feeding frenzy among investors." Now, a 25-year Wall Street veteran has pinpointed the TOP STOCK at the center of Silicon Valley's latest craze. [Get the details on his No. 1 AI stock for 2023 here before it's too late](... For a transcript of this video, see below. This transcript has been lightly edited for length and clarity. The Silicon Valley Bank Story the Media ISN'T Telling You Have you seen the headlines? A pair of major U.S. banks collapsed over the weekend. And their demise suggests the country's regulatory banking system did its job. But there's another story beyond the headlines, one you need to pay attention to. That's because it centers around an inevitable, if not unsettling goal: The U.S. government wants more control over your money. Let me explain... The SVB Fallout Let's start with what you're probably reading about in the mainstream media. Over the weekend, Silicon Valley Bank ("SVB"), America's 16th-largest bank, became the second-largest banking failure in U.S. history. Additionally, Signature Bank (SBNY) just became America's third-largest banking failure. What happened? A rule that dates to the Great Depression puts restrictions on banks, specifically on how much money they're allowed to have on their books. Banks must ensure they have enough in reserves to cover any loans or withdrawals. The problem was that neither SVB or Signature Bank had enough on hand and were scrambling to raise money to cover this shortfall. In the end, they didn't raise enough, and when a flurry of customers panicked — racing to withdrawal their funds — a bank run ensued. And both banks folded. At first blush, this is applause-worthy news. Though not under the best circumstances, the system worked like it should. Banks failing to follow regulations suffered the consequences and were shuttered. All good, right? Not quite... Crypto Enters the Picture Let's shift gears and talk about the cryptocurrency space (I'll explain why this relates to SVB in a moment). You've probably heard about the recent failures of companies like Genesis, Silvergate (SI), and FTX. Each one was involved in the crypto space... But perhaps surprisingly, so was SVB. You see, this wasn't your typical banking institution. And its dabble into crypto is what I believe has the U.S. government's mouth watering. Let me explain... Stablecoins vs. Bitcoin You see, SVB had a relationship with a company called Circle, a business offering what's known as a stablecoin. Stablecoins are different than traditional cryptos (e.g., bitcoin or ethereum). While bitcoin is uncorrelated to the U.S. dollar, stablecoins are correlated. They're backed by the dollar. So, in essence, they're considered bankrupt-proof. In July 2022, Circle's CEO said its "USDC [stablecoin] is always redeemable 1 for 1 for U.S. dollars. Any amount. Always. Period." So Circle's coin is totally safe, right? Not so fast... Circle's Connection with SVB It turns out, 25% of Circle's funds — the same funds that are supposed to back the stablecoin — were sitting in SVB — $3 billion worth. So when SVB went under, $3 billion was unavailable. That 1:1 relationship broke, and people lost money. Last year, Senator Elizabeth Warren warned about the dangers of crypto's connection with banking. And this is a perfect example of the danger she alluded to. So, what happens now? Government Takes Control Simply put, the government is going to take control. Last week, the U.S. Under Secretary of the Treasury announced that the U.S.'s digital currency, a new digital dollar, is ready to go. And this digital dollar will be backed by the Fed. Moving forward, you'll see the government pushing people away from any digital currency that's not backed by a central bank. And that will undoubtedly have an impact on your money-handling experience, whether you own crypto or not. For now, keep an eye on the U.S. government and how the digital dollar transforms. If you're a "Pro" subscriber, I've got an opportunity below that is set to outpace the S&P 500 over the next several years. We're in it to win it. Zatlin out. FOR MONEYBALL PRO READERS ONLY > [LEARN MORE]( < In it to win it, [Andrew Zatlin] Andrew Zatlin Moneyball Economics Copyright 2023 © Moneyball Economics, All rights reserved. You signed up on []( Our mailing address is: Moneyball Economics 201 International Circle Suite 110 Hunt Valley, MD 21030 [Update Subscription Preferences]( | [Unsubscribe from this list]( | [Terms of Use]( RISK NOTICE: All investing comes with risk. That includes the investments teased in this letter. You should never invest more than you can afford to lose. Please use this research for the purpose that it's intended — as research only. You should consult a professional financial advisor before ever taking a position in any securities you see herein. DISCLAIMERS: The work included in this communication is based on diverse sources including SEC filings, current events, interviews, corporate press releases, and information published on funding platforms, but the views we express and the conclusions we reach are our own. As such, this content may contain errors, and any investments described in this content should be made only after reviewing the filings and/or financial statements of the company, and only after consulting with your investment advisor. Actual results may differ significantly from the results described herein. Furthermore, nothing published by Moneyball Economics, Inc should be considered personalized financial advice. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized investment advice. Moneyball Economics is an independent provider of education, information and research on publicly traded companies, and as such, it accepts no direct or indirect compensation from any companies or third parties mentioned in any of our letters, reports or updates

Marketing emails from crowdability.com

View More
Sent On

31/05/2024

Sent On

30/05/2024

Sent On

29/05/2024

Sent On

28/05/2024

Sent On

24/05/2024

Sent On

22/05/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.