Newsletter Subject

Week 1: Keeping Ourselves Accountable

From

bonappetit.com

Email Address

email@newsletter.bonappetit.com

Sent On

Mon, Jun 15, 2020 11:00 PM

Email Preheader Text

Three things we started doing right away.  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ?

Three things we started doing right away.  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ [View this email in your browser]( [|]( [Manage newsletter preferences](newsletter=bna) [Bon Appétit]( An Update on What We've Been Up To This newsletter has historically been Bon Appétit’s Letter from the Editor. Starting now and until we have a new editor in chief, the BA and Epicurious staff will use this platform to update you on the work we’re doing to address racism and biases at the brands, both internally and in our editorial coverage. First up, acting deputy editor Amanda Shapiro on what happened in week one. Readers, viewers, subscribers, followers, and friends: How to describe all the feelings of the last week? I’ll never locate the right words, but here are some: outrage at the failures of our leaders; regret for our own complicity in racist systems; pain from airing months and years of pent-up harm; despair over the sheer amount of work ahead; awe at the opportunity we’ve given ourselves to change. Many on staff, including myself, felt that the statement we put out last week wasn’t as forceful or specific as it needed to be. But I also believe that a statement is only as powerful as the work we actually do. So, since then, we’ve focused on the work. That work happened in so many virtual meetings, in side conversations, and in private moments that I couldn’t pretend to know about or capture. So I won’t speak for all of us, but here’s my perspective on some of the work that happened this past week, and what we’re prioritizing in the weeks and months ahead. We did a lot of apologizing, and we have more to do. Both publicly and in private, I and other white staffers have apologized to our Black staffers and staffers of color for the culture we perpetuated in our offices. We’ve made personal apologies to freelance writers, contributors, and former staffers too. We recognize that we’ve lost a lot of trust among our peers, and these conversations are just one step toward regaining it. We demanded that our corporate leadership do better, and they’ve responded. We’ve had a lot of meetings with our company’s leaders, expressing our frustrations and asking for the resources we need to do better, including hiring more senior-level BIPOC staff, pay equity, transparency, investigations into wrongdoing, and training to help us build a fairer and more just workplace. The company is moving forward on some of these needs, like fast-tracking our search for a new editor in chief and prioritizing BIPOC in that search, but we know we have much more work to do. We created a manifesto for change and began to act on it. The staff has put together a document outlining specific steps we’ll take to change the culture at BA and Epicurious. We’re still refining the manifesto, but, in the meantime, we’ve seen some tangible change, like the resignation of our VP of video and a new process for handling internal investigations. We’ve also created working groups to tackle issues like reenvisioning our editorial content, addressing cultural biases in Test Kitchen videos and pay disparities among staff, expanding our pool of BIPOC freelancers, and—before we begin publishing their work—reaching out to writers, photographers, illustrators, and sources for their explicit consent. Those conversations are already happening and will continue forever because this work is never done, and that’s the point. There’s one line from our statement last week that I keep repeating to myself: We have been complicit with a culture we don’t agree with and are committed to change. To me, this line sums up the past week. It’s been a period of acknowledgment and commitment. I look forward to turning this newsletter over to the new editor in chief soon. But, in the meantime, there are so many people at BA and Epicurious doing meaningful work right now, and it’s important that their voices be heard. Next week and in the weeks following, you’ll hear from them in this letter. I join them in saying we are committed to doing better, and that work has already begun. Sincerely, Amanda Shapiro Acting Deputy Editor [MORE FROM BON APPÉTIT]( This e-mail was sent to you by Bon Appétit. To ensure delivery to your inbox (not bulk or junk folders), please add our e-mail address, bonappetit@newsletters.bonappetit.com, to your address book. View our [Privacy Policy]( [Unsubscribe]( | [Manage Newsletter Preferences](newsletter=bna) Copyright © Condé Nast 2020. One World Trade Center, New York, NY 10007. All rights reserved.

Marketing emails from bonappetit.com

View More
Sent On

10/03/2022

Sent On

28/10/2021

Sent On

19/10/2021

Sent On

02/09/2021

Sent On

26/08/2021

Sent On

24/08/2021

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.