Newsletter Subject

The Crisis Of Trust: Russian Hackers And Video Advertising’s Battle Against Bots

From

adexchanger.com

Email Address

email@adexchanger.com

Sent On

Wed, Jan 25, 2017 05:05 PM

Email Preheader Text

"On TV And Video" is a column exploring opportunities and challenges in programmatic TV and video. S

"On TV And Video" is a column exploring opportunities and challenges in programmatic TV and video. Sponsor Message [PROGRAMMATIC I/O San Francisco] [Connected Intelligence In Digital Marketing April 4-5,2017] [programmatic.io/sf] [On TV & Video] "[On TV And Video]" is a column exploring opportunities and challenges in programmatic TV and video. Today’s column is written by Gabi Peles, chief operating officer at[Eyeview]. Right before the holidays the advertising industry was rocked by the revelation that Russian cyberforgers have been waging an unprecedentedly large and sophisticated campaign. These hackers tricked the algorithms that advertisers use to buy web space with an army of bots that simulated users “watching” as many as 300 million video ads a day. They defrauded advertisers into paying[up to $5 million a day] for video ads that were never watched by real people. The elephant in the room is that if meaningful video metrics had been in place, you wouldn’t be reading this article. Shame on us as an industry. But in some ways this hack may be a good thing, as it may finally force companies on both sides of the table to seriously re-evaluate how they look at video marketing. Methbot, as it has been coined, has serious repercussions for brands and advertisers alike. Brands bought – and many will continue to buy – millions of dollars’ worth of media that they thought was being consumed by their target audiences, only to find out they were giving that money to criminals. Ad verification and video marketing companies likewise now face an uphill battle. The scale of the fraud committed has dealt a severe blow to the brands’ confidence and may make it difficult to convince their customers that traditional video media buys are still effective. This revelation might officially mark a turning point in our industry. For Video Ads, Demand A Shift Toward Accountability Simply putting an ad in front of someone isn’t enough anymore, for advertisers or their clients. Moving forward, it’s essential that brand advertisers move away from simply buying reach and instead tie their spend directly to sales. Advertisers need to be able to prove to their clients that these campaigns are positively affecting their bottom line. When we start caring less about video views and more about sales, performance increases exponentially while radically reducing fraud. The recent Methbot news and the continued issues around[Facebook and miscalculated metrics], ranging from video completion rates to average time watched, are issues derived from the broken attitude of an industry focusing on media and ad delivery metrics. Engagement metrics can easily be hacked, miscalculated or faked in some way. As Methbot proves, clicks, engagement and video views can all be simulated. But when advertisers focus on ROI and ROAS, the brand is protected from phony reporting and measurement because it’s impossible to defraud actual sales. Additionally, brand advertisers should insist on third-party measurement firms to validate sales. The select few media partners unaffected by the fraud are successful because they not only buy known individuals, they more importantly buy individuals who are likely to buy a product, not just anonymous demos or viewable impressions. In other words, rather than showing video ads to a generic audience on brand-name publishers, which is an operation that is vulnerable to fraud and largely ineffective, advertisers should focus on showing relevant ads to very specific individuals they know. A Nail In The Traditional Advertising Coffin This may be the final nail in the traditional advertising coffin, as it shines a spotlight on the giant elephant in the room that for years advertisers hated talking about: Simple views don’t count for much anymore. The age-old KPIs of impressions and reach don’t count for as much as they used to when we consider that the[way that people, especially millennials, consume and act on targeted advertising has completely changed.] Who cares if a million people see an ad if you can’t demonstrate that any of them converted into paying customers? It’s time to shift the KPI of ads to real ROI. We’re still reeling a bit and that’s OK. Nobody feels good when they’ve been cheated. The only thing to do now is redouble our efforts to provide transparency to continue solidifying the efficiency of how the industry operates in the future. Follow Eyeview ([@EyeviewDigital]) and AdExchanger ([@adexchanger]) on Twitter. [Forward To A Friend] --------------------------------------------------------------- © 2016 AdExchanger.com | 41 East 11th St., Floor 11 | New York City | NY | 10003 AdExchanger and AdExchanger.com are trademarks or registered trademarks. All rights reserved. To make changes to your email preferences or to unsubscribe, please [click here]

Marketing emails from adexchanger.com

View More
Sent On

13/12/2019

Sent On

20/09/2019

Sent On

03/09/2019

Sent On

26/07/2019

Sent On

26/07/2019

Sent On

23/07/2019

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.