Newsletter Subject

Political Advertisers Must Lean Into Advanced TV If They Want To Win Voters In 2020

From

adexchanger.com

Email Address

eletters@email.adexchanger.com

Sent On

Fri, Jul 26, 2019 05:46 PM

Email Preheader Text

"On TV And Video" is a column exploring opportunities and challenges in advanced TV and video. �

"On TV And Video" is a column exploring opportunities and challenges in advanced TV and video. [AdExchanger | On TV & Video] "[On TV and Video](” is a column written for the sell side of the digital media community. Today’s column is written by Brienna Pinnow, co-founder at [Blinc Digital Group](. High-stakes political elections are around the corner. To motivate voter turnout and drive home key candidate and issue messages, ad spend levels are anticipated to break records. [GroupM’s recent media forecast]( reveals political spend over this election cycle will top $10 billion in 2020. From a media planning perspective, TV is traditionally the largest expenditure for any political campaign. If campaign managers want to be good stewards of each dollar donated to their organization, advanced TV advertising tactics are critical. Why traditional TV buys don’t cut it For decades now, mass media buys across TV have provided the most cost-effective way for political advertisers to reach a large number of eyeballs in a storytelling format. That media buying ideology no longer holds water. Why? - Since 2013, the number of “OTT Only” households has tripled. - Traditional television markets and political geographies rarely line up. - Nearly half of millennials and Gen Xers don’t watch any traditional TV. That means program-based buys focused on GRPs lead to media plans that only connect with older people and ignore younger, persuadable voters. - Ad fatigue associated with broadcast buys often delivers poor ad experiences that citizens view as wasteful, and may even lead to a negative impact on someone who would otherwise be a supporting voter. - Traditional TV buys suffer from opportunity loss by failing to leverage the rich targeting and measurement that exists today. Why advanced TV is critical in 2020 Despite [research]( that questions the effectiveness of TV advertising’s ability to radically shift the view of potential voters (not completely surprising as these aren’t ads for soda or toilet paper, after all), TV will remain a cornerstone in upcoming political advertising media plans. If campaign leaders, however, are going to invest billions, it’s time for them to put down the billy club (aka broadcast TV) and stop browbeating folks with their message. Instead, they should leverage a more gentle, meaningful and surgical approach – advanced TV. Tactics like data-driven linear planning, addressable TV, CTV and OTT can not only help match the right message with the right voter, but also deliver it at the right frequency. Challenges and benefits Bringing an advanced TV strategy to life is not without its hurdles. The process can feel fragmented. Should I use my DSP, work directly with a network or partner with platform like Roku? Inventory is limited. CPMs are not cheap. Interactive ads require extra work. And targeting precision is at the household level – not individual – which potentially dilutes the power of targeted messages when homes are divided politically. On the flip side, parties and special interest groups have access to more data than ever. Not only can marketers use voter data, but they can augment this information with third-party data – such as information indicating how likely someone is to donate to a party or cause. Segmentation can also be utilized to highlight which issues matter most to an individual, to hyper-localize a campaign and to create custom or look-alike audiences. Here are some more reasons advanced TV is poised to take center stage in 2020: - Expert Guidance – Every major TV and video company has staffed a team of political advertising experts to support campaign goals, with firewalls between GOP and Democratic selling teams. - Personalized Messaging – It’s now possible to deliver one-to-one messages to voters that align with their values, beliefs and behaviors. CTV and OTT also allow for interactive ad experiences, which could potentially become another source of audience insights used to optimize media decisions. - Scalable Audiences – We are at the point of critical mass, with nearly [three-quarters of the country]( owning a connected TV device. - Curated Experiences – Targeted TV supports better frequency management, so you aren’t over saturating particular groups or individuals. (Insert a slow clap from voters everywhere!) There is also an opportunity to coordinate sequential messaging across channels. - Measurement – TV shouldn’t be “set it and forget it” for any brand, let alone political advertisers. In a volatile environment, it is critical to measure the impact of your campaign message on your target audience. Advanced TV allows for advertisers to close the circle and understand what is happening in the real world. - Safety – In comparison to other channels or platforms [previously riddled with political advertising controversy]( (cough-Facebook-cough), advanced TV offers a relatively curated, brand-safe environment. You can’t buy a campaign victory with TV ads alone, but you can use advanced TV to tell the story you want, and at the right cadence, by speaking to an audience that is actually willing to listen. © 2019 AdExchanger and AdExchanger.com are trademarks or registered trademarks. All rights reserved. [View in web browser]( This message was sent to {EMAIL} To ensure delivery to your inbox, [add us to your address book](. AdExchanger • Access Intelligence LLC • 9211 Corporate Blvd., 4th Floor, Rockville, MD 20850 | [Privacy Policy]( [Update My Preferences | Unsubscribe]( [spacer.gif](

Marketing emails from adexchanger.com

View More
Sent On

13/12/2019

Sent On

20/09/2019

Sent On

03/09/2019

Sent On

26/07/2019

Sent On

23/07/2019

Sent On

19/07/2019

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.