Newsletter Subject

Why The 2017 Upfronts Could Be A Buyer’s Market

From

adexchanger.com

Email Address

email@adexchanger.com

Sent On

Wed, Dec 21, 2016 05:21 PM

Email Preheader Text

"On TV And Video" is a column exploring opportunities and challenges in programmatic TV and video. S

"On TV And Video" is a column exploring opportunities and challenges in programmatic TV and video. Sponsor Message [Stream Video Ads From Their Source] [Find out how Extreme Reach is changing TV and Video Advertising] [extremereach.com/stream-on] [On TV & Video] “[On TV and Video]” is a column exploring opportunities and challenges in programmatic TV and video. After this exclusive first look for subscribers, this story by AdExchanger’s Kelly Liyakasa will be published in its entirety on [AdExchanger.com] on Thursday. The 2016 TV upfronts [ended] with networks posting double-digit CPM increases, but will that momentum carry into 2017? Two key factors could help buyers wield more influence at the bargaining table this year. Changing of the guard in the sales C-suite ABC News sales vet Catherine Sullivan [departed] in mid-November for Omnicom, and ABC’s sales chief, Geri Wang, will [step down] in March, prior to the peak upfront negotiation period. Fox Network’s head of ad sales, Toby Byrne, [exited] his network in September, while Viacom’s sales leader, [Jeff Lucas], left for Snapchat after completing 2016’s upfront. These departures come at a crucial time for broadcasters competing with the winner of last year’s upfronts – NBCUniversal. “You’ve got to have a lot of power in the marketplace because you’re up against NBCUniversal, which brings really strong broadcast dayparts, cable networks and digital assets,” said one TV agency executive, who asked to remain anonymous. “Maybe we see ABC, Disney and ESPN come closer together as a result of the transitions, which is what we’ve said needs to happen for a long time.” Inventory prices are up, but programming ratings are down In addition to organizational uncertainties at the networks, traditional ratings are falling as more viewership moves to digital and video on demand. Amazon, Netflix and Hulu are also gaining power by offering content with few or no ads. As a result, many networks are racing to improve the consumer experience by [reducing] ad loads by as much as 50% for certain programs. But this reduction is offset by price increases. “A lot of the pricing hikes we saw [during the 2016 upfronts] were likely the result of supply shrinkage, rather than more money coming back into the space,” predicted Marianne Gambelli, the chief investment officer at Horizon Media. Although the strong 2016 upfront made the TV ad market appear robust, buyers believe ratings declines – especially in traditionally strong categories like live sports – prove that consumer habits are evolving. Although the US general election could be responsible for some viewership shortfalls, the [NFL] still experienced its most significant drops in ratings this fall. And if TV audiences have evolved, buyers say, then networks should too. “More of our teams are looking across the OTT and video landscape,” said one buyer. “We’re starting to shift money within our own TV pools, so I think the competition will get harder for them.” Despite these headwinds, [broadcast] networks believe that the strength of the scatter market – inventory bought for a higher price closer to the air date – will continue into the first quarter of 2017. And although networks still view upfronts as a hallowed time to secure big commitments, they see the writing on the wall and are striking digital deals (e.g., NBC and Apple News/BuzzFeed) and preferred partnerships to get ahead of new buyer demands. "I think there’s still a defined upfront marketplace and a moment in time where [buyers leverage] 50-60% of their [money] to get the best deals, inventory, marketing and value,” said Maureen Bosetti, chief investment officer for IPG Mediabrands’ Initiative. She added: “The principle of the upfront has remained the same, but the timing of it and the partners you talk to have changed. Conversations are happening at different times throughout the year to ensure more fluid conversations, given the evolving needs for our clients." Follow Kelly Liyakasa ([@KellyLiyakasa]) and AdExchanger ([@adexchanger]) on Twitter. [Forward To A Friend] --------------------------------------------------------------- © 2016 AdExchanger.com | 41 East 11th St., Floor 11 | New York City | NY | 10003 AdExchanger and AdExchanger.com are trademarks or registered trademarks. All rights reserved. To make changes to your email preferences or to unsubscribe, please [click here]

Marketing emails from adexchanger.com

View More
Sent On

13/12/2019

Sent On

20/09/2019

Sent On

03/09/2019

Sent On

26/07/2019

Sent On

26/07/2019

Sent On

23/07/2019

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.