Newsletter Subject

Why ThinkProgress Abandoned Banner Ads

From

adexchanger.com

Email Address

email@adexchanger.com

Sent On

Tue, Dec 13, 2016 05:41 PM

Email Preheader Text

“The Sell Sider” is a column written by the sell side of the digital media community. Spon

“The Sell Sider” is a column written by the sell side of the digital media community. Sponsor Message [Lotame Data Management Platform] [Where Data, Innovation, and Agility Connect] [www.lotame.com] [AdExchanger Heading] “[The Sell Sider]” is a column written by the sell side of the digital media community. After this exclusive first look for subscribers, the story by AdExchanger’s Sarah Sluis will be published in its entirety on [AdExchanger.com] on Wednesday. In the summer leading up to the 2016 US presidential election, liberal political website ThinkProgress moved from WordPress to Medium. It abandoned its ad networks and programmatic banner ads and switched to Medium’s sponsored posts. ThinkProgress made the change because it saw revenue from banner ads flattening, and it didn’t want to compromise the user experience to bring the revenue back up. “I think that the ad network model is insufficient to support quality journalism,” said Judd Legum, editor-in-chief of ThinkProgress, which he founded in 2005. “The rates are too low, and there is constant downward pressure. And especially if you are a midsize publisher or lower, it’s harder to get major brands interested in just buying you, so [direct sales] is closed off to you.” ThinkProgress could have added higher-value banner ad units to make up the difference but didn’t like how they affect user experience. And it already disliked how ads slowed down the page load and its inability to completely filter out low-quality ads. “You can always add more units or make your units more annoying or use a lot of pre-roll video or interstitials [to boost revenue],” Legum said. “We really didn’t want to do that because we are a mission-driven publication.” The site’s sister organization is the liberal think tank, the Center for American Progress. Shifting to Medium also meant ThinkProgress didn’t have to use its limited development resources to optimize for mobile or make its pages compatible with Google AMP or Facebook Instant Articles. “We found there were a lot of web standards, and it was hard for us to adapt to that,” Legum acknowledged. ThinkProgress has been pleased with the transition to Medium. After a blip in search and social results due to the transition, traffic bounced back and then some. Monthly traffic in November was the highest in its 11-year history, by more than 30%. ThinkProgress expects revenue will be the same or better compared to when it relied on ad networks and programmatic. Legum called the results “favorable” so far. “We hope that as Medium builds out its advertising model, which is nascent, we end up in a much better place,” he said. Business operations manager Jonathon Padron, who used to spend his time optimizing the ad stack and reading header-bidding documentation, shifted to selling sponsored posts through Medium. Credo Mobile, a carrier that donates money to social causes, and Aspiration Partners, which bills itself as “a financial firm with a conscience,” have run posts. “It’s nice to have a conversation where you don’t feel like a commodity to the person on the other side,” Padron said. “In the lead-in to the conversation, you are talking about audience, brand equity and identity, and how that aligns with the advertiser, versus click-through rates and CPMs.” Besides direct sales, ThinkProgress plans to experiment with Medium’s membership model next year. And it’s selling “Resist” T-shirts and allowing users to donate to its Trump Investigative Fund. “We want to try to diversify the revenue streams and not have too many eggs in one basket,” Legum said. ThinkProgress’ small staff and focus on quality journalism and user experience made it a strong fit for Medium, which aims to improve the user experience while helping sites monetize. But Legum sees more midsize publishers approaching the same crossroads. “There is always someone who can get someone to look at a website cheaper than you can,” Legum said. “We were looking for a way out, to grow our revenue and expand, but not create a bad experience for readers. You are going to see a lot of midsize publishers and smaller try to get out of that environment.” [Forward To A Friend] --------------------------------------------------------------- © 2016 AdExchanger.com | 41 East 11th St., Floor 11 | New York City | NY | 10003 AdExchanger and AdExchanger.com are trademarks or registered trademarks. All rights reserved. To make changes to your email preferences or to unsubscribe, please [click here]

Marketing emails from adexchanger.com

View More
Sent On

13/12/2019

Sent On

20/09/2019

Sent On

03/09/2019

Sent On

26/07/2019

Sent On

26/07/2019

Sent On

23/07/2019

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.