Newsletter Subject

What If Nielsen Disappeared?

From

adexchanger.com

Email Address

email@adexchanger.com

Sent On

Wed, Jan 9, 2019 06:51 PM

Email Preheader Text

"On TV And Video" is a column exploring opportunities and challenges in programmatic TV and video. S

"On TV And Video" is a column exploring opportunities and challenges in programmatic TV and video. Sponsor Message [AdExchanger Awards Entries Open Until 1/31]( [Submit your entry for "Best Programmatic Or Addressable TV Campaign"]( [www.adexchangerawards.com]( [AdExchanger | On TV & Video] "[On TV And Video](" is a column exploring opportunities and challenges in advanced TV and video. Today’s column is written by Krish Sailam, senior vice president of programmatic solutions at [DWA,]( a Merkle company. Nielsen has been in the news lately, and not in a flattering light. With a [major TV studio]( (CBS) and [media agency]( (Gray) casting doubts on the efficacy of its TV ratings, Nielsen finds its outdated model in peril. Frankly, I’m surprised this didn’t happen sooner. Nielsen TV ratings affect everything from programming to ad revenue. But Nielsen [carries enormous debt](, and its ownership may [be in flux](. Ironically, Nielsen’s ubiquity puts the company in a precarious position: No major firm has a clear path to purchase because potential purchasers all have conflicts of interest. With Nielsen in such an uncertain position and with no obvious buyer, what would a world without Nielsen look like? Specifically, what would happen to the TV and advertising industries that rely so heavily on the Nielsen measurement model? A video industry without Nielsen already exists, made up of streaming platforms like Netflix and Amazon. Original content on those platforms has proven to be more experimental and unique than that of their linear peers. These programming risks are impossible for traditional TV studios that use revenue models reliant on Nielsen ratings for ad revenue. Without Nielsen tying them to ratings determined by a small group of theoretically “representative” viewers, studios may become more comfortable making bolder programming choices. Of course, content must remain subject to consistent measurement if it is to be monetized. Therefore, a possible boom in niche content may end up being subverted by the second significant change I anticipate in a Nielsen-less world. With a major, lucrative void in the measurement space, technology companies will flood to fill the vacuum. Nielsen uses outdated methods to produce ratings, including questionable panels and remote tracking devices. To succeed where Nielsen fails, new contenders would need to provide the strongest and most advanced solutions or risk being swallowed by competitors. Ideally, the system to eventually emerge would look something like if a telecom like AT&T bought Vizio’s TV manufacturing business and could measure anything that appeared on a screen. Linking recognized programming to directly measurable telecom data served through a home connection would create an undeniably accurate ratings system that was universal across technologies and products. Unfortunately, this scenario could also result in a legal nightmare fraught with privacy violations. For that reason, I foresee a third major change that could occur if Nielsen went away: government regulation. Regulations currently prevent Nielsen from a more invasive tracking approach. Nielsen’s demise may not lead to policy change on its own, but with a massive stake in the matter, I wouldn’t be surprised if tech lobbying and special interest firms seized the opportunity to ask for major changes to allow for a new standard of measurement and analysis. The death of Nielsen could create short-term chaos in advertising. I can imagine large agency holding groups pulling back on upfront deals or aggressively shifting dollars to other channels such as search, social, audio or programmatic, which would lead to a decline in TV revenues and an industry in disarray. But as the technology and legal landscape settle, buyers would adopt a standardized buying model, as if nothing had changed. Advertisers would receive better reporting and insights, and a stronger buying industry would emerge from the rubble. And finally, what would happen to consumers? Imagine a world in which “prime-time” programming was only on during the times you personally wanted to watch it? Imagine if our favorite canceled shows – which we now stream from sketchy websites – were watchable and shareable? The world has evolved since Nielsen started measuring TV in 1950. The American family does not gather at 7 p.m. to watch TV. Network choices that reflect this ancient rule will no longer define what we watch or when. Follow DWA ([@dwaTechMedia]() and AdExchanger ([@adexchanger]() on Twitter. © 2019 AdExchanger.com | 41 E. 11th Street, Floor 11 | NYC | 10003 AdExchanger and AdExchanger.com are trademarks or registered trademarks. All rights reserved. [Update your email preferences](

Marketing emails from adexchanger.com

View More
Sent On

13/12/2019

Sent On

20/09/2019

Sent On

03/09/2019

Sent On

26/07/2019

Sent On

26/07/2019

Sent On

23/07/2019

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.