Newsletter Subject

Ad Loads Are Actually Increasing, But That Won’t Offset TV’s Long-Term Negative Trends

From

adexchanger.com

Email Address

email@adexchanger.com

Sent On

Fri, Jan 4, 2019 08:20 PM

Email Preheader Text

"On TV And Video" is a column exploring opportunities and challenges in programmatic TV and video. "

"On TV And Video" is a column exploring opportunities and challenges in programmatic TV and video. [AdExchanger | On TV & Video] "[On TV And Video](" is a column exploring opportunities and challenges in advanced TV and video. Today’s column is written by Eric Berry, CEO at [TripleLift](. TV is a fundamental part of any marketer’s mixed media model. For many brands, TV is the highest performing inventory source. Yet the trends are unquestionably negative for TV advertising overall, though TV is not dead nor will it be any time soon. While higher ad loads helped neutralize falling TV viewership in recent years, they aren’t a long-term solution. What may help offset the confluence of negative TV trends in 2019 – a year that promises dramatic changes in the industry – is a significantly sharper focus on targeting, measurement and innovative ad formats. The biggest negative trend facing TV is, of course, shrinking viewership – [a 2-4% continued year-over-year decline](, according to Nielsen, depending on whether you include virtual multichannel video programming distributor (vMVPD) distribution. Meanwhile, TV ad load is actually increasing, despite industry commentary to the contrary. In August 2017, TV ad loads were 10.9 minutes per hour, compared to 11.2 minutes per hour in August 2018, according to GroupM’s annual [State of Video]( report. Increased TV ad load offset the decline in users, leading to flat overall year-over-year TV revenue. Meanwhile, Amazon, Netflix and Hulu are the unquestioned market leaders in streaming content. Prime and Netflix have no commercials, and that isn’t likely to change in the foreseeable future, though they both have paid product placement in [the vast majority of their original content](. Hulu allows its users to pay to reduce or eliminate ads, an option that [roughly 40% of its users have chosen](. If the distribution platforms with the most content by far have no pre-roll and mid-roll ads, it seems unlikely that streaming consumers will tolerate anywhere near the level of advertising that is common in cable. In 2019, subscribers will continue to leave cable TV at a steady and meaningful rate. This will be exacerbated by streaming services continuing to improve and offer a broader array of compelling content. Increased ad minutes cannot continue to offset the declines. Of course, the TV industry won’t be content to simply make less money, and it instead will look to improve its monetization. First, better ad targeting and attribution that deliver and prove results will allow for higher CPMs. This is especially true as the penetration of smart cable boxes and vMVPDs increase. Companies that offer improved measurement, online-to-offline attribution and targeting – both audience and contextual – will reap significant benefits. It is highly likely that Nielsen will upgrade its core measurement system to embrace the modern multidistribution model of content. Between DVR and consumers continuing to become acclimated to the reduced ad load model of streaming, every publisher – linear TV or any digital video – will increasingly need to move away from an abundance of 60- and 30-second mid-roll ads. This means that it is unlikely that we will see meaningful growth of programmatic mid-roll ads of these lengths in high quality content (there may be a brief period of growth, followed by decay). Instead, very short – perhaps six-second contextual ads – will become more prevalent rather than largely being a subject of discussion. Further, new formats of video advertising will begin to make their way into the mainstream, following concepts like the in-action cutaways Fox pioneered in the World Series that have become increasingly common in sports. Users will likely have a greater tolerance for ads that don’t cut away completely – many of which are increasingly standard in parts of Asia – and 2019 promises to be a year of significant experimentation. Follow Eric Berry ([@ezberry](), TripleLift ([@triplelifthq]() and AdExchanger ([@adexchanger]() on Twitter. © 2019 AdExchanger.com | 41 E. 11th Street, Floor 11 | NYC | 10003 AdExchanger and AdExchanger.com are trademarks or registered trademarks. All rights reserved. [Update your email preferences](

Marketing emails from adexchanger.com

View More
Sent On

13/12/2019

Sent On

20/09/2019

Sent On

03/09/2019

Sent On

26/07/2019

Sent On

26/07/2019

Sent On

23/07/2019

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.