Newsletter Subject

Adjusting The Dial: How TV’s Future Tracks To The Evolution Of Digital Advertising

From

adexchanger.com

Email Address

email@adexchanger.com

Sent On

Wed, Oct 31, 2018 06:53 PM

Email Preheader Text

"On TV And Video" is a column exploring opportunities and challenges in programmatic TV and video. S

"On TV And Video" is a column exploring opportunities and challenges in programmatic TV and video. Sponsor Message [Rubicon Project Video]( [Access a Premium Video Marketplace at Scale]( [( [AdExchanger | On TV & Video] "[On TV And Video](" is a column exploring opportunities and challenges in advanced TV and video. Today’s column is written by Michael Connolly, co-founder and CEO at [Sonobi](. Advertisers that spend money during the Super Bowl pay an exorbitant amount of money for consumer attention, but there is no guarantee that this will lead to any direct action during the customer funnel or, more importantly, profit. But this is changing. It is only a matter of time until TV advertising follows the same model as digital advertising: Instead of showing the same advertisement to everyone, distinct ads will be simultaneously presented to different groups of people. This generates value for the publishing network by creating more inventory and for the advertiser by focusing their ad spend on addressable people. In short, it resets the school of thought surrounding Super Bowl ads that the biggest audience possible for an ad is always the best. So why don’t we do this right now? The underlying technology must mature to make it a reality. Personalized advertising was made feasible and widely adopted in digital advertising mostly due to the development of the ad server, which manages and runs online advertising campaigns. Even though customized advertising in online platforms is now considered the norm, this was unfathomable when advertisements first appeared on web pages. The first digital ad was a single banner on the top third of hotwired.com, displayed for an entire month. Ultimately, the publisher realized that if it rotated the ads, it would have more inventory and provide better targeting. As demand increased and the difficulties related to rotating ads and targeting became apparent, publishers developed their own ad servers to manage these complex tasks. Eventually, ad servers such as DoubleClick for Publishers emerged. Nowadays, ad servers have very advanced targeting capabilities. Interacting with them through their API is mature and developed. They allow multiple platforms to feed into a central solution. I see a parallel between the evolution of digital advertising and the emergence of individualized TV advertising. Currently, local broadcast TV can be sold per channel down to the DMA level, but this is a long way from a one-to-one addressable environment. Television presently lacks fairly basic functionality in terms of ad serving. We just don’t have a comparable version of the digital ad servers in television: One ends up with a very manual process in the last mile, which is inconsistent with scalability, automation and addressability. Nonetheless, smart TVs, mobile applications and companies such as Hulu and Netflix are all progressing toward people-based TV buying. As these channels emerge, a standard will be developed around how to deliver advertising to these environments using targeted data. This path will follow a similar process as digital advertising, where TV ad tech creates its own ad servers. The ability to identify individuals watching a particular piece of content on TV is coming, one way or another. After that tech is delivered, all that remains is standardization for how to deliver an ad to the viewer. After that, it’s likely that the era of ubiquitous Super Bowl ads will come to a close and TV will become personal and addressable, just like digital advertising. Follow Sonobi ([@sonobi]() and AdExchanger ([@adexchanger]() on Twitter. © 2018 AdExchanger.com | 41 E. 11th Street, Floor 11 | NYC | 10003 AdExchanger and AdExchanger.com are trademarks or registered trademarks. All rights reserved. [Update your email preferences](

Marketing emails from adexchanger.com

View More
Sent On

13/12/2019

Sent On

20/09/2019

Sent On

03/09/2019

Sent On

26/07/2019

Sent On

26/07/2019

Sent On

23/07/2019

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.