Newsletter Subject

Contextual Targeting’s Resurgence In The Year Ahead

From

adexchanger.com

Email Address

email@adexchanger.com

Sent On

Tue, Jan 2, 2018 08:03 PM

Email Preheader Text

“The Sell Sider” is a column written by the sell side of the digital media community.

“The Sell Sider” is a column written by the sell side of the digital media community. [AdExchanger Heading] “[The Sell Sider](” is a column written by the sell side of the digital media community. Today’s column is by Paul Bannister, co-founder and executive vice president at [CafeMedia](. Contextual targeting is one of the original forms of targeted marketing, hearkening back to the days when Chevrolet might have run an ad next to a local newspaper's feature story on new cars for the coming year. That crude model for contextual targeting migrated onto the web in the early days of digital advertising in the ’90s. If users browsed a video game website, they were assumed to like video games, and video game advertisers would buy ads there. Over the years, contextual advertising declined in popularity as digital marketers opted for flashier methods, such as audience-based buying, retargeting and CRM onboarding. Context has taken a back seat to user-data driven marketing, but in 2018, I believe contextual targeting will enjoy a resurgence as new technologies and approaches enhance its capabilities and marketers learn more about the limitations of other tactics. Before we dive in, it's worth revisiting the user experience around contextual targeting. When consumers are in the mindset of making a purchase, they seek content to help make the right decision. A given user is usually researching products across many days, weeks or months before the purchase, so reaching that consumer across that entire timeframe is critical. And, this means marketing based on context pays dividends over time – as some consumers will purchase today and others six months later. Contextual Marketing's Historic Challenges Measurement has always been a challenge for contextual targeting since the experience is such a long process. Attribution models relying on click-through and view-through measurement favor targeting at the very bottom of the funnel. That minimizes the value of all other touch points that contributed to driving a consumer toward a purchase. This impacted the use of contextual targeting, as context is always a great indicator of intent, but pinpointing the "moment of truth," when consumers are about to make a purchase, is hard to combine with contextual targeting. Marketers were biased toward scaled mediums that purport to find consumers at that last moment before purchase, but rarely had any real impact on their purchasing decisions. Another limitation has been the rarity of great content for contextual targeting. Much of a consumer's time online is spent playing games, sharing with friends, reading the news or other activities unrelated to purchasing decisions. While marketers might want to target consumers when they're researching a purchase, that rarity limited their ability to find consumers at the right time but also drove the pricing up. The combination of flawed attribution models with limited and expensive access curtailed buyer interest significantly. What's New In 2018 I believe that 2018 will see a number of changes that will push marketers back toward context in a big way. First is the long-standing need to improve attribution systems. Existing models haven’t been effective, and the technology wasn't there to improve them. That's changing now, with much more sophisticated multitouch attribution systems that will uncover the long-term value driven by media targeted to context. Apple's ITP, GDPR and other pro-privacy moves by governments and industry will continue to limit marketers’ ability to target consumers across sites and devices. These limitations won't necessarily decrease digital budgets but will drive advertising toward cookieless targeting methodologies, with contextual targeting being at the top of that list. Much work is also being done to categorize and organize available content. Earlier, less sophisticated contextual targeting systems could categorize content into simple groupings such as "style and fashion/women's fashion" or "automotive/SUV," but newer approaches can drive much deeper understanding of the content. This deeper knowledge can make the connection between content and intent, which are closely tied but often hard to link. Overall, the rise in advanced attribution modeling, an increase in the scale and value of contextual targeting systems and larger trends toward privacy should make 2018 a year for strong growth in contextually targeted digital advertising. Buyers want to be where consumers are making decisions, and relevant content is the gold standard in that regard. Now the technology finally has caught up with buyers' intent. Follow Paul Bannister ([@pbannist](), CafeMedia ([@CafeMedia_]() and AdExchanger ([@adexchanger]() on Twitter. --------------------------------------------------------------- © 2018 AdExchanger.com | 41 East 11th St., Floor 11 | New York City | NY | 10003 AdExchanger and AdExchanger.com are trademarks or registered trademarks. All rights reserved. To make changes to your email preferences or to unsubscribe, please [click here](

Marketing emails from adexchanger.com

View More
Sent On

13/12/2019

Sent On

20/09/2019

Sent On

03/09/2019

Sent On

26/07/2019

Sent On

26/07/2019

Sent On

23/07/2019

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.