Newsletter Subject

Is US Debt Crippling the Economy?

From

zacks.com

Email Address

zacksinvestmentmanagement@zacks.com

Sent On

Sun, May 29, 2016 09:38 AM

Email Preheader Text

Is US Debt Crippling the Economy? U.S. debt has been a hotly debated topic for as long as it’s exis

Is US Debt Crippling the Economy? U.S. debt has been a hotly debated topic for as long as it’s existed—which means it’s always been a hotly debated topic. The thought of knowing that our country has some $19 trillion in total debt outstanding makes many stomachs turn, especially when you consider that it’s more than our total annual GDP (estimated at $18.2 trillion through Q1 2016). The questions on everyone’s minds are: Since when does the United States borrow more than it makes? Is this level of debt sustainable for our economy? Is it debilitating, helpful, or inconsequential? More... ------------------------------------------------------------------ [Should You Put More Money in Stocks or Fixed Income?] Before attempting to answer this question, be sure to check Zacks' newly released Economic Outlook for June, 2016. Today, Mitch on the Markets’ readers are invited to download it FREE. This Special Report reveals Zacks latest forecast for S&P 500 returns 2016-2018 and compares it to the prediction for 10-year notes during the same period. Also, get the latest scoop on other trends that could impact your portfolio: • GDP growth • Price of crude oil • Corporate profits • Unemployment rate • Housing starts • What the Fed is up to • And much more [Free Download: Just-Released Zacks Economic Outlook >>] ------------------------------------------------------------------ Looking at US Debt from 19 Trillion Feet The following charts will help put U.S. total debt in context. Let’s start with the elephant in the room, which is total public debt. There is no question that the total amount of debt outstanding has been growing at an exponential pace since the 1990’s, expanding from some $3 trillion to $19 trillion in 25 years. Source: U.S. Department of the Treasury, Fiscal Service This chart, by itself, is alarming. In these 25 years, we’ve financed two wars and dedicated huge amounts of capital to the economic recovery in the aftermath of the ‘Great Recession,’ which included bank and auto bailouts. Even so, the economy saw big growth in the 1990s and, by measure of today’s GDP, the U.S. economy is the largest it has ever been. So, we can’t say that debt has been debilitating, but it is still worrisome. That is, until you think of debt in a different context—in this case as a percent of GDP. Doing so does not necessarily debunk the notion that our debt levels are high, but it is worth noting that we have been at these levels before (in the aftermath of debt financing during World War II). Back then, our debt-to-GDP ratio nearly touched 120%. Today it’s about 100%. Source: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, U.S. Office of Management and Budget If we return to the question of debt either being debilitating, helpful or inconsequential, in the case of WWII we can at least conclude that it was not debilitating. From the end of WWII through the early 1970’s, the U.S. economy grew very swiftly and was referred to as a “golden age of economic growth.” The economy saw leaps and bounds of growth in productivity, income gains, manufacturing through innovations in automation, retail and wholesale growth through improved highway systems, and so on. With that, the impact of high debt was probably somewhere between helpful and inconsequential, but definitely not debilitating. The other important question to ask when it comes to debt is: how expensive is it? And, by that I mean, how much is it costing us to service our debt? The answer to that question today is that it is near historical lows—cheap as ever. Think of it this way—it is one thing if an unqualified borrower takes on big debt loads at high interest rates (that’s a recipe for crisis, see Greece). But, this is not the situation for the U.S. We are a qualified borrower paying super low interest rates for new debt. The interest we pay on debt as a percent of GDP is the lowest it has been since the 1970’s. Servicing our debt in the 1980’s and 1990’s was costlier than it is now, and the economy did well in both of those decades. There is no reason it can’t do well now under the current circumstances. Source: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, U.S. Office of Management and Budget Additionally, refinancing debt that is maturing is as cheap now as ever with rates on the 10-year U.S. Treasury at very low levels. The chances of interest rates skyrocketing on us by surprise and making debt levels less manageable is pretty low in my view. I expect the 10-year U.S. Treasury to remain below 5% for at least a couple of years, if not more. Source: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development Bottom Line for Investors Perhaps the biggest takeaway is that having elevated levels of debt is not necessarily debilitating for the economy. The U.S. economy is a lot more resilient and diverse than most people give it credit for and, though lower levels of debt are arguably preferable to higher ones, the economy can still do quite well even with a higher debt load—especially if that debt is dirt-cheap, which it is today. So does that mean you should be a little more aggressive with your investments? That depends on a lot of factors, but as a starting point I've arranged for you to receive a free download of Zacks' Economic Outlook for June, 2016 free of charge. Just released, this Special Report shows what Zacks Investment Management believes will happen next quarter through 2018. Should you expect greater returns from the S&P 500 or from 10-year notes? What is the Fed likely to do? Is there another housing boom in the offing? Will the price of crude oil move up or down? Is the recent blip in core inflation "noise" or something more serious? Today, these critical predictions and a great deal more can give you a significant heads-up over other investors. [FREE Download - New Zacks Economic Outlook>>] Best Regards, Mitch Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Inherent in any investment is the potential for loss. Zacks Investment Management, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Zacks Investment Research. Zacks Investment Management is an independent Registered Investment Advisory firm and acts as an investment manager for individuals and institutions. Zacks Investment Research is a provider of earnings data and other financial data to institutions and to individuals. This communication is for informational purposes only and nothing herein should be construed as a solicitation, recommendation or an offer to buy or sell any securities or product, and does not constitute legal or tax advice. The information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable but we do not guarantee accuracy or completeness. Zacks Investment Management, Inc. is not engaged in rendering legal, tax, accounting or other professional services. Publication and distribution of this article is not intended to create, and the information contained herein does not constitute, an attorney- client relationship. Do not act or rely upon the information and advice given in this publication without seeking the services of competent and professional legal , tax, or accounting counsel. To unsubscribe from receiving Zacks Investment Management's Market Insight e-mail newsletter, [click here]. To contact us by mail: Zacks Investment Management Attn: Wealth Management Group One South Wacker Drive, Suite 2700 Chicago, IL 60606 [Zacks] You are registered to receive this "Zacks Investment Management" e-mail newsletter at {EMAIL}

Marketing emails from zacks.com

View More
Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

07/12/2024

Sent On

05/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Sent On

02/12/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.