Newsletter Subject

Editor’s Note: AI’s complicated social life

From

wired.com

Email Address

wired@newsletters.wired.com

Sent On

Fri, Sep 10, 2021 11:07 AM

Email Preheader Text

Insert preview text here. | to receive future editions of this exclusive email. It may have seemed l

Insert preview text here. [View this email in your browser]( | [Manage newsletter subscriptions](newsletter=wir) [WIRED Special Edition: Letter from the Editor] 09.10.21 We hope you enjoy this free edition of Gideon Lichfield’s Letter from the Editor. [Subscribe to WIRED]( to receive future editions of this exclusive email. [SUBSCRIBE NOW]( It may have seemed like a logical solution to the opioid crisis: Create an algorithm to identify patients at high risk of overusing opioids, and advise doctors not to prescribe opioid-based painkillers to them. But that strategy may only have made the epidemic worse, as Maia Szalavitz [reports for WIRED](. The algorithm, NarxCare, is a kind of “secret credit score” for opioid risk. It often flags people it shouldn’t, and by denying meds to people in severe pain, it’s driving many to seek out illegal drugs that they’re more likely to get addicted to. And even as prescribing has fallen sharply over the past decade, overdose deaths have risen to a record high. As we’ve been reporting, AI is working its way into ever more spheres of medicine. It’s being used to [screen for breast cancer](. It could [predict when viruses will mutate](. In the future it may help doctors [remotely track patients’ vital signs]( to spot dangerous conditions before they become fatal. There’s great promise here. So why does it sometimes go spectacularly wrong, as with NarxCare? I think part of the answer is in this story by WIRED’s Tom Simonite about [another risk-assessment algorithm](, one used to alert nurses that a patient might be developing sepsis, a frequent killer in American hospitals. It forces changes in routines and workflows, but doctors don’t always believe it, or are more receptive to its diagnoses at some times than at others. The algorithm, as Tom writes, has “a complicated social life.” The phrase made me think of the book The Social Life of DNA, by Alondra Nelson, a Princeton sociologist who is now deputy head of the White House’s Office of Science and Technology Policy. WIRED’s Khari Johnson [interviewed her in June](, and one of her key points was that the AI field needs to “move from technical standards to … socio-technical standards.” That means, among other things, that people developing an AI tool shouldn’t just evaluate whether it accurately predicts cancer or sepsis or opioid risk, but also how people will interpret and act on those predictions—and whether those actions could end up doing more harm than good. Building an AI, these days, can be almost trivial. Figuring out its effects is much harder. These are just a few of the complex, thought-provoking stories we've published recently; some of my other favorites are listed below. Gideon Lichfield | Global Editorial Director, WIRED If you liked this Editor's Note, please consider [subscribing to WIRED]( in order to receive future editions. [SUBSCRIBE NOW]( [[GET WIRED]( [Stare the future right in the eye.]( [Get 1 year of unlimited access to WIRED for less than $1 per month. That includes Steven Levy's exclusive newsletter and a free tote!]( [Subscribe now.](]( [The Delta Variant Is Making Covid a Pandemic of the Young]( [BY GREGORY BARBER | 6-MINUTE READ]( [Now that children are becoming the biggest group of unvaccinated people in Western countries, it’s become clear they’re not as immune as they seemed.]( [Looks That Quill: The Dark Side of Hedgehog Instagram]( [BY NOELLE MATEER | 11-MINUTE READ]( [How a cute species got sacrificed on the altar of popularity algorithms.]( [Fleeing Disaster Is Hard. Climate Change Is Making It Harder]( [BY MATT SIMON | 6-MINUTE READ]( [The more severe fires and hurricanes become, the less warning there is for people to get out of the way.]( [Pokimane Has Done Enough—and Has So Much Left to Do]( [BY CECILIA D'ANASTASIO | 16-MINUTE READ]( [A look inside the exhausting, always-on, perfectly curated life of a Twitch streaming star.]( [Covid Has Created a Virtual Renaissance for Life Drawing]( [BY SUHITA SHIRODKAR | 5-MINUTE READ]( [Instead of leaving models without work, the pandemic has given some of them new ways to find it, and even take control of how they are drawn.]( [So … What If Aliens’ Quantum Computers Explain Dark Energy?]( [BY STEPHON ALEXANDER | 15-MINUTE READ]( [The outcome of a wacky thought experiment between a physicist and Jaron Lanier, the godfather of VR.]( [Afghanistan Almost Beat Polio. Now the Future Is Uncertain]( [BY MARYN MCKENNA | 5-MINUTE READ]( [Will the return to power of the Taliban put one of the world’s last remaining eradication efforts at risk?]( [Hundreds of Ways to Get S#!+ Done—and We Still Don’t]( [BY CLIVE THOMPSON | 16-MINUTE READ]( [Ever wondered why there are hundreds of productivity apps and only a handful of word-processing ones? It’s not a coincidence.]( [(image) WIRED Logo]( [(image) WIRED on Facebook]( [(image) WIRED on Twitter]( [(image) WIRED on Instagram]( [(image) WIRED on LinkedIn]( [(image) WIRED on YouTube]( [Podcasts]( This e-mail was sent to you by WIRED. To ensure delivery to your inbox (not bulk or junk folders), please add our e-mail address, wired@newsletters.wired.com, to your address book. View our [Privacy Policy]( [Unsubscribe]( or [manage your newsletter subscriptions](newsletter=wir) Copyright © Condé Nast 2021. One World Trade Center, New York, NY 10007. All rights reserved.

Marketing emails from wired.com

View More
Sent On

02/12/2024

Sent On

30/11/2024

Sent On

08/11/2024

Sent On

06/11/2024

Sent On

06/11/2024

Sent On

03/11/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.