Newsletter Subject

Your Future As Peasants

From

wigginsessions.com

Email Address

feedback@wigginsessions.com

Sent On

Fri, Sep 15, 2023 09:16 PM

Email Preheader Text

“A central dimension of presidential power is the use of the Office’s bully pulpit to seek

“A central dimension of presidential power is the use of the Office’s bully pulpit to seek to persuade Americans — and American companies — to act in ways that the President believes would advance the public interest,” the administration wrote. ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ September 15, 2023 |  [View Online]( |  [Sign Up]( Your Future As Peasants I know the human being and fish can co-exist peacefully. — George W. Bush Dear , Okay, so are we “boiling the oceans,” as former Vice President Al gore told the Davos Crowd of the World Economic Forum earlier this year… or are we “burnt toast”? Neither sound very positive. And on a sunny day in the Mid-Atlantic, 75 degrees and a slight breeze, it doesn’t feel much like either. Still, it’s not a question we’re asking lightly. CONTINUED BELOW... POWERED BY THE GOLD & SILVER SUMMIT Free event: 5 threats to your retirement We're under attack… This is a major economic offensive to destroy the dollar. In the process, your financial rights will be stripped from you. If you want to survive and escape the new economic reality our citizens face…Make plans now to attend the upcoming [Gold & Silver Summit on October 5, 2023 @ 4pm PT / 7pm ET.]( Our experts will show you how dire our situation is. Why your retirement savings and future is in danger. Unless you do something to protect your hard earned money now. [Click here to register for free.]( CONTINUED... The journal Science Advances published the results of a study which has been measuring 9 key health factors for the planet earth. They include, Earth’s climate, biodiversity, land, freshwater, nutrient pollution and “novel” chemicals, those created by man. Those six metrics are all “out of whack” according to the AP, because all six are exceeding “safe operating space for humanity” on this shining ball of blue we call home. “We are in very bad shape,” said Johan Rockstrom, director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research. “We show in this analysis that the planet is losing resilience and the patient is sick.” Of the three other metrics the study tracks – ozone, health of the air and acidity in the oceans – only the ozone layer is in whack. “I’ve often said if we don’t quickly cut back on how we are stressing the Earth, we’re toast,” commented Granger Morgan, a professor of environmental engineering at Carnegie Mellon, when interviewed by AP. “This paper says it’s more likely that we’re burnt toast.” As you can imagine, after the AP covered the study, the rest of the legacy press chimed right in. The “narrative,” of course, is that we’re all doomed to be boiled alive and, apparently, have dry mouth as we try to swallow the “burnt toast” conclusion. You’ll recall, here in The Daily Missive we’ve been following the debate between the “alarmists” and “deniers.” The alarmists want draconian measures taken to mitigate the causes of climate change in their scientific view. The deniers, many of whom don’t dispute the science at all, but have a beef with the policy being crammed down our throats by politicians and unelected bureaucrats all over the globe. Deniers favor “adaptation” which is best supported by a free market and open source innovation. Addled by the Baader-Meinhoff phenomenon, we see these debates all over the place from network news to twitter posts. The mitigators believe we need draconian measures to bring the Earth back into the whack it was before the Industrial Revolution in the 1750s. Oy. “Climate change is the perfect problem for enterprising globalists,” Jim Rickards told us in a Wiggin Sessions interview earlier this year. “It’s a global problem, so it requires a global solution.” Our buddy Jud Anglin, writing in Mark Moss’ newsletter Brush Fires, identifies some objectives of the Davos Crowd, should we go along with their premise and accept that the seas are, in fact, boiling and the air tastes like stale bread crumbs. Here are the objectives of The Green World Order policy agenda, in bullet point form, according to Jud: Centralized for total control. Eyes on you… Eyes on me. A transformation from fossil fuels to electricity. All your home appliances will have to be electrified: Furnaces… Gas Ranges and Ovens. ... Water Heaters. ... Clothes Dryers. ... Fireplaces. ... Grills. ... Fire Pits... Outdoor Lighting… And, of course, you’ll drive an Electric Vehicle (EV). The X (formerly Twitter) iconoclast, Jordan Peterson, tweeted a longer list: No fireplaces No meat No dairy No heat No air conditioning No cars No clothes No flights No comedians No free speech No cash No cats No dogs No farm animals No children Your future as peasants Under the eco-fascists Really just fascists with the best excuse ever There are two main tenets we follow in our writing. The first is we start most of our inquiries with a simple question: “What could go wrong?” Then we see where that question takes us. The second is “ignore politics at your peril.” CONTINUED BELOW... POWERED BY DEMISE OF THE DOLLAR CONTINUED... Both tenets are vital to keep in mind when planning your future… what you’re going to do with your money, what you’re going to do to protect your family, what you can do to ignore the busy body world improvers who want to tell you where to live, what to eat, what energy you can use, what you drive and… the worst of them all, what you can “think”. Today’s installment of “ignore politics at your peril,” comes loaded with a fresh dose of Orwellian doublespeak. Below, you’ll find a piece tracking the Great Barrington Declaration as it wends its way through the courts. We’ll let the authors, Leighton Woodhouse and Alex Gutentag, writing in today’s episode of the online publication, Public, explain the Declaration and why it's destined for the Supreme Court. Some context, The Biden White House, including specific members thereof, has been issued an injunction by a Federal judge in Louisiana forbidding them from talking to social media companies (like X, Facebook, LinkedIn etc.). Specific evidence has been cited in instances where the Biden administration has demanded specific posts they deemed “misinformation” about the COVID-19 virus, mask mandates and vaccines. It’s a deep rabbit hole, if you have a few days of free time you want to spend wondering whatever happened to the America that cherished free speech. Spoiler alert: White House lawyers are trying to get the injunction lifted because… the injunction violates the government’s right to free speech. In other words, they are using the 1st Amendment to argue they have the right to censor statements they don’t agree with. Yeah, see below. In light of the climate “debate”, we’re keenly observing the Great Barrington Declaration as it trundles its way toward 1 First St NE, Washington, DC. If the Biden folks have their way, they will also be able censor “misinformation” about the climate. Rather, they will only allow you to read the forgone conclusion that the climate crisis is here and we must act urgently. After all, “[the science is settled,]( right? “What kind of disaster,” we’re wondering beholden to our first tenet, “would a climate crisis lockdown of the economy create?” And how long could we expect the government to use emergency powers like they did during the pandemic? It’s Friday, enjoy the read below. And enjoy your weekend! —Addison FREE SPEECH ON TRIAL BY LEIGHTON WOODHOUS & ALEX GUTENTAG Missouri v. Biden, one of the most important free speech cases in American history, is almost certainly going to the Supreme Court. The case centers around whether the Biden administration violated the First Amendment of the Constitution when it pressured social media platforms to take down or de-amplify accounts that voiced speech the government disagreed with. Two of the plaintiffs in the case are Stanford University’s Dr. Jay Battacharya and Dr. Martin Kulldorff, currently on leave from Harvard, who co-wrote a statement called the [Great Barrington Declaration,]( which laid out an alternative public health response to lockdowns and school closures. For that, they were [personally targeted]( by Anthony Fauci and then-NIH Director Francis Collins, who orchestrated a media campaign to discredit them. On social media, they were censored and shadow-banned, which is at the heart of the case. On the Fourth of July, a federal judge issued an injunction to prevent the government from pressuring social media companies to censor any further content. That ruling was appealed to the Fifth Circuit, which issued a mixed ruling on the injunction. Yesterday, the Biden administration asked the Supreme Court to weigh in by appealing the federal court’s injunction. That’s a risky move for the government, given how stridently pro-free speech this court is. Most observers believe the Supreme Court is almost certain to hear the case. In its application for a stay on the injunction, the Biden administration argued that the Fifth Circuit decision “contradicts fundamental First Amendment principles.” “A central dimension of presidential power is the use of the Office’s bully pulpit to seek to persuade Americans — and American companies — to act in ways that the President believes would advance the public interest,” the administration wrote. “The court imposed unprecedented limits on the ability of the President’s closest aides to use the bully pulpit to address matters of public concern, on the FBI’s ability to address threats to the Nation’s security, and on the CDC’s ability to relay public health information at platforms’ request.” In other words, according to the Biden administration, by preventing the government from censoring people, the court is violating the government’s freedom of speech. Public is tracking this case closely and will report on any developments here as it makes its way to the nation’s highest court. By Leighton Woodhouse and Alex Gutentag, writing in [Public](. POWERED BY REPUBLICAN METAL COMPANY [Danger] Major banks to recall US dollar The introduction of the FedNow Digital Dollar is sounding the alarm for Americans who fear the loss of their financial privacy. Are you prepared to protect yourself from this looming threat? Precious metals have stood the test of time as mankind's largest store of value. As the Fed enacts measures to control your wealth, the value of Gold could see all time highs. Claim your [FREE Digital Dollar Guide]( now and discover how to safeguard your wealth against the imminent dangers of the FedNow Digital Dollar. [Claim your FREE Digital Dollar Guide now.]( The Daily Missive from The Wiggin Sessions is committed to protecting and respecting your privacy. We do not rent or share your email address. By submitting your email address, you consent to The Wiggn Sessions delivering daily email issues and advertisements. To end your The Daily Missive from The Wiggin Sessions e-mail subscription and associated external offers sent from The Daily Missive from The Wiggin Sessions, feel free to [click here.]( Please read our [Privacy Statement.]( For any further comments or concerns please email us at feedback@wigginsessions.com. If you are having trouble receiving your The Wiggin Sessions subscription, you can ensure its arrival in your mailbox by [whitelisting The Wiggin Sessions.]( © 2023 The Wiggin Sessions 808 Saint Paul Street, Baltimore MD 21202. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized financial advice. We expressly forbid our writers from having a financial interest in any security they personally recommend to our readers. All of our employees and agents must wait 24 hours after online publication or 72 hours after the mailing of a printed-only publication prior to following an initial recommendation. Any investments recommended in this letter should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company. Sent to: {EMAIL} [Unsubscribe]( Consillience, LLC, Saint Paul Street, 808, Baltimore, Maryland 21202, United States

EDM Keywords (246)

year writing writers worst words whitelisting whack wends weigh wealth ways way want vital violating value vaccines using use two trying try trundles trial transformation tracking today time throats three test tenets tell talking take swallow survive submitting study stripped stressing stood stay start sounding something six situation sick show share seek see security second seas science safeguard ruling right reviewing retirement results rest respecting requires report rent register recall readers read question protecting protect prospectus professor process privacy printed preventing prevent president prepared premise powered positive politicians policy planning planet plaintiffs place peasants patient pandemic orchestrated office oceans objectives nation narrative money mitigate mind metrics meat mankind man makes mailing mailbox made loss lockdowns live likely light licensed letter let leave laid know kind keep july issued introduction interviewed instances installment inquiries injunction imagine ignore humanity human heat heart hear harvard government going get future freedom fourth following follow flights fish first fireplaces find fear fbi fascists family eyes experts expect escape episode ensure enjoy energy end employees electricity eat earth drive doomed dollar dogs dispute discredit discover disaster dire developments destroy destined deniers demise deemed declaration debates debate days dairy created crammed courts court course control context content consulting constitution consent communication committed comments comedians clothes click cited children censored censor cdc causes cats cash case cars bring boiling blue beef attend attack arrival argue application appealing appealed apparently ap analysis americans america also allow alarmists alarm air agree advertisements address act acidity accept ability

Marketing emails from wigginsessions.com

View More
Sent On

30/04/2024

Sent On

15/02/2024

Sent On

14/02/2024

Sent On

13/02/2024

Sent On

12/02/2024

Sent On

12/12/2023

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.