Newsletter Subject

Set Yourself Up Before the Government Creates Billions for This Industry

From

widemoatresearch.com

Email Address

feedback@exct.widemoatresearch.com

Sent On

Wed, Feb 21, 2024 10:01 PM

Email Preheader Text

Brad?s Note: At Intelligent Income Daily, we often write about the power of government contracts.

[Intelligent Income Daily]( Brad’s Note: At Intelligent Income Daily, we often write about the power of government contracts. As we always say, there are few clients more reliable than the U.S. government. And when the government is helping to fund a project, the chances to profit are much more likely. For safe income-focused investors like us, that’s important. Today, we’re sharing a story from our colleague Nomi Prins. Nomi’s recent visit to an iconic American landmark showcases the power of a government-backed project. She’ll also share where the government is pouring its money into next… and gives you one way you can profit from this move. Set Yourself Up Before the Government Creates Billions for This Industry By Nomi Prins, Editor, Inside Wall Street With Nomi Prins I stood 726 feet above ground, as the mighty Colorado River roared below me. Red mountain peaks towered in front of me, as far as I could see… And for a moment, I was speechless. [image] Nomi visits the iconic Hoover Dam If you’ve ever been to the Hoover Dam, you might know the feeling. I’ve traveled all over the world, from Brazil to Thailand. I’ve seen hundreds of historic landmarks – from the Great Wall of China to the Sydney Harbor Bridge in Australia. And the Hoover Dam still blew me away. But as I’ll show you below, there’s more to this American icon than meets the eye. And it holds moneymaking clues today. Where Public Money Goes, Private Money Follows The Hoover Dam was a feat of bipartisan support and private companies’ efforts. It stemmed from President Herbert Hoover’s decades-long push to rein in the power of the Colorado River. A government agency called the Reconstruction Finance Corporation (RFC) financed the project. Funding was just shy of $49 million (about $903 million in today’s dollars). Yet, the government didn’t set up the RFC with the dam in mind. It was a finance vehicle designed to help Wall Street weather the Great Depression. But because of one of five key RFC provisions, funding for the Hoover Dam became a reality. Under Provision Four, private companies could help the government with public infrastructure projects. That included “bridges, tunnels, docks, waterworks, canals, and markets devoted to public use.” The Hoover Dam ticked that box. Now, the government provided the initial funding for the project. But that doesn’t mean the government built the dam. First off, companies had to put their own skin in the game. If a company wanted to even bid on the mega-project, it had to cough up $2 million. Then it had to shell out another $5 million to back a performance-related bond. This was to guarantee it would keep to the job, no matter how difficult it became. At the time, the nation was stuck in the Great Depression. So the idea of paying up for a juicy government contract was enticing. That was especially true in the construction industry. There, the Great Depression was eating into jobs and forward-looking business strategies. But the dam was too expensive and complex of a project. No single company could pony up that much money for the contract… or to guarantee the project’s completion. So, in the end, the contract didn’t go to just one firm. Instead, on February 19, 1931, a group of companies formed a coalition. The Six Companies That Built the Dam The Six Companies, as they were called, won the $49 million contract. At the time, it was the largest contract of its kind. And the largest public-private partnership in the history of the United States up to that point. The winners were all relatively small or family-owned companies. But one name in particular stands out: the Bechtel Corporation. You might recognize the Bechtel name as a multinational mega-company. But it wasn’t anywhere near that back then. Until the Hoover Dam project came along, Bechtel was a tiny family road construction company founded in 1898. But it seized the challenge of the Hoover Dam project. And – together with Henry J. Kaiser Co. of California – Bechtel put $1.5 million into the dam. The Bechtel family grew into a global construction, energy, and technology company on the wings of that project. Today, Bechtel is the second-biggest construction company in the United States. And it’s one of America’s largest private companies, with a $40 billion market cap. It was in the right place at the right time. What This Means for Your Money Today Now, I’m not suggesting that you buy Bechtel. After all, it’s a private company. So even if we wanted to, it’d be nearly impossible. Instead, I’m telling you this because we’re at another crossroads for our nation’s infrastructure. In the 1930s, the Hoover Dam gave small companies the chance to grow bigger. And right now, legislation coming out of Washington is creating a similar opportunity in the energy markets. The nuclear energy revival I’ve been writing about is about to go into overdrive… I got a recent glimpse of that on Capitol Hill, where I had dozens of meetings with Congressional leaders and staff in the energy space. When I was there, 17 energy bills sailed through markup in a single meeting. Ten of them were nuclear energy-related bills. That kind of volume and speed is not normal in Washington! A staffer contact of mine from Delaware later confirmed this was the most bills with the quickest process he’d ever seen. But these bills aren’t fully baked into the cake yet. They’re due to start getting funding early this year. That means we’re about to see a lot more policies directed at supporting nuclear energy and technology and domestic uranium and nuclear fuel supplies. And if you’re a regular reader, you know that it pays to follow Washington’s money trail. A simple way you can position yourself to take advantage is through the Global X Uranium ETF (URA). It’s a fund that provides access to companies involved in uranium mining and nuclear technologies. It holds 46 companies, including Cameco, the Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund, and NexGen Energy. And it’s a great place to start your search. Regards, [signature] Nomi Prins Editor, Inside Wall Street with Nomi Prins [Wide Moat Research]( Wide Moat Research 55 NE 5th Avenue, Delray Beach, FL 33483 [www.widemoatresearch.com]( To ensure our emails continue reaching your inbox, please [add our email address]( to your address book. This editorial email containing advertisements was sent to {EMAIL} because you subscribed to this service. To stop receiving these emails, click [here](. Wide Moat Research welcomes your feedback and questions. But please note: The law prohibits us from giving personalized advice. To contact Customer Service, call toll free Domestic/International: 1-888-415-6046, Mon–Fri, 9am–5pm ET, or email us [here](mailto:feedback@widemoatresearch.com). © 2024 Wide Moat Research. All rights reserved. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution of our content, in whole or in part, is prohibited without written permission from Wide Moat Research. [Privacy Policy]( | [Terms of Use](

Marketing emails from widemoatresearch.com

View More
Sent On

23/05/2024

Sent On

22/05/2024

Sent On

21/05/2024

Sent On

16/05/2024

Sent On

15/05/2024

Sent On

09/05/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.