Newsletter Subject

Did You Miss the SEO Vault? Chaz Talks Link Building to Listings

From

web20ranker.com

Email Address

support@web20ranker.com

Sent On

Sun, Feb 20, 2022 02:10 PM

Email Preheader Text

20% cashback on all link packages ends at midnight + catch up on the SEO testing ‌ ‌ ?

20% cashback on all link packages ends at midnight + catch up on the SEO testing ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  {NAME}, If you build links to clients' listings, you'll want to catch up on this week's episode of the SEO Vault. Chaz discusses a large test he did with 4 different types of listing links, plus other SEO news. Today is also the last chance to get cashback on any link purchase... 20% Cashback on all Link Purchases We're excited to launch our free, custom link recommendations soon so watch out for information about that too! You'll be able to find the best links for each client with this new tool. If you're not sure what links to buy, for now you can check out our [Link Buying Guide]( for use cases and recommendations. To your success, Chaz and the Entire Team  [Get 20% Back on Links](   SEO Mad Scientist 🧪🥼🔬  Hey there see you mad scientists. Today we're back with a quick update as we start digging into our multivariable test that we went over last week. The first two things we were looking at testing were the impact of image hotlinking and Unicode. Since we've done quite a few Unicode tests we were interested in getting this one out of the way at the beginning to see if anything had changed from our previous results. As for the hot link image test, that test can actually be broken up into two different aspects which includes the hotlinking of the image, as well as the aspect of linking back to the original post the image was used on. More importantly if we were to do all of our images this way would we get better results all around with compounding ranking returns. Let's start off by looking at our unicode test which so far has shown about the same results as our previous Unicode tests. Simply by taking the top ranking sites content and changing the Unicode and posting it to our main website the GMB is linking to, we have yet to see any major movement in about the first two weeks.  It's possible that this Unicode combined with the other aspects may have accounted for ranking increases, but so far as a single variable we haven't seen much major results on a local level. Now let's talk about our image test. As we said this test can be broken up into two variables so because of this we decided to do three separate tests. One test where we simply added the image hotlink, one test where we simply linked our images to the top ranking sites,and another test where we did both (like on our original multi variable test) Let's give us some insight into how these different variations can affect the impact of the rankings. It's been just under two weeks since the first variation of this test was launched so we are going to give the other two an additional week to catch up and report at all next week. Do you think the Unicode test will eventually show some bigger movement? Do you think hotlinking images helped or do you think it was outbound authority links on the images that helped more? Or is it possible that all of these things combined is what produced our initial results? Find out next week on the SEO med scientist and don't miss another update. Until next week… Happy Testing! FROM THE VAULT Episode 128 Co-Host: Bucky Helms + Sophie Allen + Mike Milas What we discussed this week... ✔️ Is Google Search Ranking Algorithm Update Coming Soon? ✔️ Google Search Asks Do You Own This Product Before Reviewing It ✔️ Google Business Profiles New Business Calls API ✔️ Answered: I have a client that wants to open another location in a city about 100 miles away. What’s the best practice for keeping the same website, but still having effective SEO for the new location? > [Watch the Latest]( Vault]( episode to catch up on the most recent local update and so much more. Don't forget The SEO Vault airs live on the Web 2.0 Ranker Facebook every Thursday at 4 pm EST. Interested in being a guest on the vault!? Sign up now [( You are receiving this email because you subscribed to our list to stay alerted to the latest news, case studies, and offers from the Web 20 Ranker team. If you have any suggestions or recommendations or questions please drop us a note at support@web20ranker.com. Additionally, if you want to modify your subscription options or the frequency of emails, please let us know at support@web20ranker.com Sent to: {EMAIL} [Unsubscribe]( Web 20 Ranker, 3915 Union Deposit Rd #918, Harrisburg, PA 17109, United States

Marketing emails from web20ranker.com

View More
Sent On

23/06/2023

Sent On

23/06/2023

Sent On

21/06/2023

Sent On

19/06/2023

Sent On

16/06/2023

Sent On

15/06/2023

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.