The Goldilocks Index Funds

They're not top-heavy or bottom-heavy... [Wealthy Retirement]( SPONSORED [Tired of Gambling (and Losing) on Stocks?]( [Losing at Poker Table]( Discover the only way in the market to WIN BOTH WAYS. Whether a stock surges up... Or plunges down. You can win... BIG! "Awesome trade! Made enough to pay for my daughter's car [188% overnight gain]." - Mark D. [See the secret by CLICKING HERE (while you still can).]( [MARKET TRENDS]( Why Equally Weighted Index Funds Outperform Jody Chudley, Contributing Analyst, The Oxford Club [Jody Chudley] In his 2013 letter to Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: [BRK-A]( shareholders, Warren Buffett detailed how he advised the trustees of his estate to manage the money he will leave to his wife. Buffett's exact instructions were to "put 10% of the cash in short-term government [bonds]( and 90% in a very low-cost S&P 500 index fund." That is it. Buffett believes in the long-term growth of American business, and he is happy to have his estate own these companies for the long term. I admire Mr. Buffett greatly. But I disagree with him on the guidance that he has provided for his estate trustees. Rather than just buying a standard low-cost S&P 500 index fund, he should instead consider an equal-weighted S&P 500 index fund. The data reveals that, over time, equal-weighted index funds produce better results. Let me show you what I mean... Understanding Market Capitalization Weighting A typical index fund tracks a certain group of publicly traded companies. An S&P 500 index fund, for example, owns the exact 500 companies (with the exact same position weighting) as those in the S&P 500 Index. Most index funds are market-capitalization-weighted. That means a greater percentage of the money managed by the fund gets invested into the largest companies it owns. For example, the largest holding of an S&P 500 index fund today is Apple (Nasdaq: [AAPL]( the world's largest company by market capitalization. Today, Apple represents 5.65% of an S&P 500 index fund. Meanwhile, the 100th-largest position in the index is General Motors (NYSE: GM), which currently represents just 0.22% of an S&P 500 index fund. That means a market-capitalization-weighted S&P 500 index fund now carries a position in Apple that is 25 times larger than its 100th-largest position (General Motors). And there are 400 positions that carry an even smaller weighting than General Motors. The smallest position is HollyFrontier Corporation (NYSE: HFC), which accounts for a minuscule 0.01% of the S&P 500 Index. With the top-heavy way the index is constructed, the largest companies have a disproportionate influence on performance. Currently, the top 10 S&P 500 positions represent more than 27% of the index. That is a record-high concentration. The smallest positions, meanwhile, are so small that they have very little impact on the overall performance of the fund. SPONSORED [Will America Become Unrecognizable Within 2 Years?]( [Green and O'Reilly]( The same expert who predicted the dot-com bubble, the 2008 crisis, the 10-year bull market and the exact bottom of the coronavirus crash... Now says that the America you know and see before you is going to change DRAMATICALLY over the next two years. [See what's about to happen... and plan accordingly.]( Long-Term Data Favors Equal Weighting An equally weighted index fund is built differently than a standard market-capitalization-weighted fund. An equally weighted fund isn't top- or bottom-heavy. It is perfectly balanced. That means it is much more diversified. In an equally weighted index fund, all of the positions are given the same weighting. For an equally weighted S&P 500 index fund, that means Apple is given the same weighting as General Motors and HollyFrontier Corporation. Therefore, all of the holdings have the same impact on total performance - no matter how big or how small the underlying companies are. And historical data shows that equally weighted index funds perform significantly better. The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (NYSE: RSP) launched in 2003. Here is how it has performed in comparison with a standard market-capitalization-weighted S&P 500 fund since then... [Equal Weighting Does Not Mean Equal Performance]( That is a pretty wide margin of outperformance since inception. If we look back even further in the data, we can see even more consistency... One study, which looked all the way back to 1925, found that over every single 40-year holding period, an equally weighted S&P 500 fund would have outperformed. (For clarity, the 40-year holding period was selected because that is the typical amount of time between when someone starts saving and when they retire.) The study also found that over the entire time period starting in 1925, an equally weighted S&P 500 fund would have outperformed by 2.7% per year on average. For perspective on how big a difference a 2.7% annual outperformance is over the long term, consider these numbers... - A $10,000 investment that earns 9% annually for 30 years turns into $147,305. - A $10,000 investment that earns 11.7% annually for 30 years turns into $289,399. [That's the power of compound interest, folks!]( I'm a numbers guy, and the data in favor of equal weighting is very convincing. With capitalization-weighted S&P 500 funds currently sitting with a record-high concentration in their top 10 holdings, I would suggest that the outperformance of the equally weighted S&P 500 over the next 10 years will be even larger than normal. Good investing, Jody P.S. No sector sees small stocks make gigantic leaps as regularly as the biotech sector. Here, it's especially important to ensure that you don't overlook the "little guys" - because if you catch the right ones, it could lead to your biggest profits. Chief Income Strategist Marc Lichtenfeld wants to help you do just that. [Click here]( to learn more about the special offer he's making to new subscribers of his biotech research service, [Lightning Trend Trader]( - he's offering a second year of the service completely free. [Leave a Comment]( MORE FROM WEALTHY RETIREMENT [Why Phase 2 Trials Are Important to Investors (and Why I'm Enrolled in One)]( [Is There Still Upside for the Biotech Sector?]( [The Secret to Successful Biotech Investing]( [Facebook]( [Facebook]( [Twitter]( [Twitter]( [Email Share](mailto:?subject=A%20great%20piece%20from%20Wealthy%20Retirement...&body=From%20Wealthy%20Retirement:%0D%0A%0D%0AThey're%20not%20top-heavy%20or%20bottom-heavy...%0D%0A%0D [Email Share](mailto:?subject=A%20great%20piece%20from%20Wealthy%20Retirement...&body=From%20Wealthy%20Retirement:%0D%0A%0D%0AThey're%20not%20top-heavy%20or%20bottom-heavy...%0D%0A%0D SPONSORED [Big Tech's "Secret Savior" in 2021?]( [Space Satellite]( The world's biggest tech companies are now pouring BILLIONS into the exciting space and satellite sectors... But one TINY company holds three massive advantages over the Big Boys... We think they'll soon be partnering up... And that puts it in a GREAT position for the biggest megatrend of the decade. [Details here.]( [The Oxford Club]( You are receiving this email because you subscribed to Wealthy Retirement. Wealthy Retirement is published by The Oxford Club. Questions? Check out our [FAQs](. Trying to reach us? [Contact us here.]( Please do not reply to this email as it goes to an unmonitored inbox. [Privacy Policy]( | [Whitelist Wealthy Retirement]( | [Unsubscribe]( © 2021 The Oxford Club, LLC All Rights Reserved The Oxford Club | [105 West Monument Street](#) | [Baltimore, MD 21201](#) North America: [1.800.589.3430](#) | International: [+1.443.353.4334](#) | Fax: [1.410.329.1923](#) [Oxfordclub.com]( The Oxford Club is a financial publisher that does not offer any personal financial advice or advocate the purchase or sale of any security or investment for any specific individual. Members should be aware that although our track record is highly rated by an independent analysis and has been legally reviewed, investment markets have inherent risks and there can be no guarantee of future profits. The stated returns may also include option trades. We expressly forbid our writers from having a financial interest in their own securities recommendations to readers. All of our employees and agents must wait 24 hours after online publication or 72 hours after the mailing of printed-only publications prior to following an initial recommendation. Any investments recommended by The Oxford Club should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company. Protected by copyright laws of the United States and international treaties. The information found on this website may only be used pursuant to the membership or subscription agreement and any reproduction, copying, or redistribution (electronic or otherwise, including on the world wide web), in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited without the express written permission of The Oxford Club, 105 W. Monument Street, Baltimore MD 21201.