Newsletter Subject

The Theft of the Century?

From

wealthdaily.com

Email Address

newsletter@wealthdaily.com

Sent On

Mon, Jun 28, 2021 09:26 PM

Email Preheader Text

This company’s technology could do to today’s chips what Alexander Graham Bell did to the

This company’s technology could do to today’s chips what Alexander Graham Bell did to the telegraph. Outsider Club editor Jimmy Mengel discusses what could be the greatest invention of the 21st century and the company behind it... This company’s technology could do to today’s chips what Alexander Graham Bell did to the telegraph. Outsider Club editor Jimmy Mengel discusses what could be the greatest invention of the 21st century and the company behind it... [Wealth Daily logo] The Theft of the Century? By Jimmy Mengel Written Jun 28, 2021 It’s a well-known fact that Alexander Graham Bell invented the telephone. We’re taught it in elementary school. The Bell Telephone Company became one of the most successful businesses in American history. There is even a crater on the Moon named after the guy! It all started in 1876 with Bell’s patent for the telephone — U.S. Patent No. 174,465 — widely considered to be the single-most important patent in history. But what if it was all based on a lie? This picture could hold the secret to one of the biggest thefts of the last century... [bell patent] What they didn’t teach us in school was that there was a rush to the patent office on that fateful Valentine’s Day of 1876. A fellow inventor named Elisha Gray submitted his very similar “talking telegraph” idea to the U.S. Patent Office a mere few hours after Bell. At the time Gray was an established professional inventor and founder of the Western Electric Manufacturing Company. Bell, however, worked as a private speech teacher for the deaf with a side gig as an inventor. Both patents were based on the idea of a liquid telephone transmitter — essentially an early microphone. That’s where the picture above comes in... Invest in Companies BEFORE They Go Public If you’re investing in stocks, especially in technology stocks, then you’re missing out BIG TIME! In fact, according to Inc., you’re missing out on "95% of the gains." For every $100 in profit those companies are making investors, you’re only getting five measly bucks. If that sounds unfair and you want access to the other 95% of the profits, then I’ve got an offer for you... Thanks to a recent act of Congress, the private markets where all those profits are taken, which were once off-limits to all but the super-wealthy and well-connected, are now open to all. [Just click here and you’ll learn how to get started today...]( The larger drawing was part of the caveat document that Gray turned in that day. The other drawing was found in Bell’s journal, dated March 9 — almost a month later. It doesn’t take Sherlock Holmes to notice the incredible similarity between them. Not long after his journal entry, Bell built the liquid transmitter and made the famous first call to his assistant: “Mr. Watson, come here, I want to see you.” The rest is history. There are heated arguments on each side of the Bell vs. Gray debate. There is anecdotal evidence from a patent officer named Zenas Wilbur that Bell slipped him $100 for a look at Gray’s document that day. There is also evidence that Wilbur was a penniless drunk who was bribed by a rival telephone company for their own purposes. Bell also successfully defended his various patents over 600 times, going all the way to the supreme court. We may never know the whole truth. But it hardly matters to Alexander Graham Bell whose place on the Mount Rushmore of American geniuses has been etched in stone. As they say, history is written by the winners, and to the victor goes the spoils. Speaking of, history is now repeating itself right now with a brand new series of patent wars — and you could be the winner... We’ve already seen how litigious patents have been in the cellphone age. There have been countless court cases in the “smartphone patent wars” that have involved every global smartphone you can think of. The most notable was Apple versus Samsung... The #1 Gold Stock of the Decade This firm is potentially sitting on the richest undeveloped gold mine on Earth. It trades for around $4 a share right now. But soon it could be trading for $40 or more. [Click here]( for details. The two industry heavyweights began sparring way back in 2011 when Apple accused Samsung of infringing on its patents. The lawsuit noted similarities in the user interface and style — seemingly minor details like the curved shape of the phone to the two-finger “pinch-to-zoom” gestures. In 2018, Samsung eventually settled with Apple for an undisclosed sum (thought to be around a half-billion dollars), but Samsung was still able to market its products. In the meantime both companies had to drop hundreds of millions on attorney fees. As you can see, the sheer amount of lawsuits and cash flying around is mind-boggling. Patent litigation is itself a multi-billion dollar industry, and according to patent risk company RPX there are over 250,000 smartphone-related patents. And that was in 2012! A research paper in the NYU Annual Survey of American Law noted that it would take 2 million patent attorneys working around the clock to compare competing companies’ products with the patents owned in the market. It all sounds completely exhausting. That's one reason that I’m not interested in choosing sides in another telephone war. I’m more interested in the picks and shovels of the booming 5G industry that don’t have anywhere near the amount of court battles or media attention. Specifically I’m interested in the microprocessors that power the phones... Without these chips, Apple and Samsung would be sitting on millions of tons of worthless metal. I’ve found a company that already holds more than 4,200 patents, and it’s the U.S. government’s top pick for the processing chips, antenna receivers, and signal boosters used in new 5G systems. More importantly, it holds a patent for a unique design that could outprocess current computer chips tenfold. [This company’s technology]( could do to today’s chips what Alexander Graham Bell did to the telegraph. [Make it totally obsolete...]( Godspeed, [Jimmy Mengel] Jimmy Mengel [follow basic]( [@mengeled on Twitter]( Jimmy is a managing editor for [Outsider Club]( and the investment director of several personal finance advisories, [The Crow's Nest,](and [The Adventure Capitalist]( For more on Jimmy, check out his editor's [page](. *Follow Outsider Club on [Facebook]( and [Twitter](. Browse Our Archives [The Key to an Electric Future]( [This Is Why the EV Is Doomed]( [How the Rich Stay Rich]( [3 Powerful Market Indicators Are Flashing "BUY" for This One Stock]( [The Demand for Cybersecurity Sets the Tone for SentinelOne’s IPO]( --------------------------------------------------------------- This email was sent to {EMAIL}. It is not our intention to send email to anyone who doesn't want it. If you're not sure why you've received this e-letter, or no longer wish to receive it, you may [unsubscribe here](, and view our privacy policy and information on how to manage your subscription. To ensure that you receive future issues of Wealth Daily, please add newsletter@wealthdaily.com to your address book or whitelist within your spam settings. For customer service questions or issues, please contact us for assistance. [Wealth Daily](, Copyright © 2021, [Angel Publishing LLC](. All rights reserved. 3 E Read Street Baltimore, MD 21202. The content of this site may not be redistributed without the express written consent of Angel Publishing. Individual editorials, articles and essays appearing on this site may be republished, but only with full attribution of both the author and Wealth Daily as well as a link to www.wealthdaily.com. Your privacy is important to us -- we will never rent or sell your e-mail or personal information. [View our privacy policy here.]( No statement or expression of opinion, or any other matter herein, directly or indirectly, is an offer or the solicitation of an offer to buy or sell the securities or financial instruments mentioned. While we believe the sources of information to be reliable, we in no way represent or guarantee the accuracy of the statements made herein. [Wealth Daily]( does not provide individual investment counseling, act as an investment advisor, or individually advocate the purchase or sale of any security or investment. Neither the publisher nor the editors are registered investment advisors. Subscribers should not view this publication as offering personalized legal or investment counseling. Investments recommended in this publication should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company in question. ---------------------------------------------------------------

Marketing emails from wealthdaily.com

View More
Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

03/12/2024

Sent On

02/12/2024

Sent On

28/11/2024

Sent On

10/11/2024

Sent On

07/11/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.