Another Kind of Injustice

As the protests following the killings of George Floyd and Breonna Taylor enter their third week, it’s worth remembering that police brutality isn’t the only injustice black Americans live with. Today, Wealth Daily editor Samuel Taube is discussing the complex causes and effects of America’s racial wealth gap. As the protests following the killings of George Floyd and Breonna Taylor enter their third week, it’s worth remembering that police brutality isn’t the only injustice black Americans live with. Today, Wealth Daily editor Samuel Taube is discussing the complex causes and effects of America’s racial wealth gap. [Wealth Daily logo] Another Kind of Injustice [Samuel Taube Photo] By [Samuel Taube]( Written Jun 14, 2020 For the last three weeks, chants of "No justice, no peace!" have echoed across hundreds of American cities as millions of people have taken to the streets to protest against police violence after the killings of black citizens George Floyd and Breonna Taylor by white officers. It’s a simple chant, but it’s hard to argue with its underlying logic. Racial injustice feeds civil unrest. It’s a pattern which we’ve seen again and again — in Baltimore in 2015 after the killing of Freddie Gray by police, in Los Angeles in 1992 after the near-killing of Rodney King, and across the country in 1968 after the killing of Martin Luther King, Jr. by a white supremacist. And police brutality is far from the only injustice black Americans live with. Systemic racism has also given rise to a shockingly large racial wealth gap in the United States. And that gap has grown significantly in the last three decades. [racial wealth gap 1] Source: Christian Weller via Forbes The COVID-19 recession is making the divide even more apparent. As my colleague Jason Stutman [wrote in a recent article](: The timing of these protests should not be taken out of context. We just spent the last several months under a near nationwide lockdown, spiraling headfirst into an economic depression. Black Americans in particular have reported being furloughed and laid off at higher rates… America’s racial wealth gap has a variety of causes, including racist government policies, historical inequities, and subtle forms of discrimination in the labor and credit markets which persist to this day. I don’t claim to have the solution to this worsening social crisis. But I’m using my column this week to discuss the historical origins of the racial wealth gap, its destabilizing effects on America’s present-day economy, and the ideas which black economists and financial experts have put forward to help black people overcome economic racism. "Small Pill Could Save Millions of Lives" — Kevin O’Leary Chronic diseases like alcoholism, opioid addiction, diabetes, and depression can be a death sentence for millions of sufferers. Regular treatments work only 30% of the time and can take years. Now the FDA has given the go-ahead to a small pill that wipes out these diseases with just one or two doses. And elite research institutions, like Johns Hopkins, Stanford, and Harvard, have replicated and confirmed the results. "Mr. Wonderful," Kevin O’Leary, has already invested millions. [Details here...]( The Historical Roots of the Racial Wealth Gap — Where the Government Failed To look at where the racial wealth gap’s earliest origins, we have to go all the way back to the end of the Civil War and to the federal government's broken promises to freed slaves that defined the Reconstruction era. Immediately after the assassination of Abraham Lincoln, Vice President Andrew Johnson, a southern Democrat, began annulling government programs designed to help the black population gain property rights and integration into society. He famously canceled General William Tecumseh Sherman’s Special Field Order, No. 15 — a proclamation that promised every freed black family “40 acres and a mule” out of land confiscated from former slave owners — shortly after he took office in 1865. More attacks on the political infrastructure of Reconstruction followed. Congress defunded the Freedmen’s Bureau, an agency providing education and humanitarian aid to black citizens, in 1872. Reconstruction itself abruptly ended in 1877, when Republicans abandoned most of their civil rights agenda in exchange for Democrats allowing the election of Rutherford B. Hayes after the disputed 1876 election. The U.S. government only became more incompetent in its handling of economic race relations from then on. During the Great Depression, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt created the Home Owners' Loan Corporation (HOLC) as part of the New Deal. The corporation’s purpose was to refinance distressed mortgages in order to prevent foreclosures. But it ended up having a much more sinister effect on the American economy. As part of its operations, HOLC created maps to assess the credit-worthiness of homes in different towns and neighborhoods. These maps, generated by white civil servants who often held racist personal beliefs, were color-coded by race, and majority-black areas were marked in red and designated as “hazardous.” [racial wealth gap, redlining] Source: University of Richmond This practice of “redlining” — illustrated in the HOLC map of Richmond above — reinforced housing segregation and contributed to the formation of capital-starved “ghettos” in many urban black neighborhoods which exist to this day. In sum, the federal government played a significant role in preserving and even expanding the racial wealth gap in the 19th and early 20th century. But the private sector isn’t without guilt, either… How the Credit and Labor Markets Have Contributed to Racial Inequality In fact, the subprime mortgage bubble which preceded the Great Recession disproportionately ensnared black homebuyers. Predatory lenders, drunk on cheap credit and a lack of oversight, hawked subprime mortgage loans with deceptive variable interest rate schemes (low “teaser rates” upfront, unaffordably high rates a few years later) to millions of black buyers. Many of these black homebuyers were fairly wealthy and would have qualified for a normal mortgage with a low, fixed interest rate. But lenders, for no discernable reason other than racism, made a concerted effort to unload variable-rate subprime loans on them. In 2006, at the height of the subprime mortgage bubble, black and Hispanic families with annual incomes above $200,000 were more likely to be given a subprime loan than white families with annual incomes below $30,000. And when the interest payments on variable-rate mortgages rose to unaffordable levels in the late 2000s, they caused a wave of foreclosures to hit black neighborhoods — disproportionately destroying black wealth. In Prince George’s County, Maryland — the wealthiest majority-black county in the country — the median house price dropped from $343,000 in 2007 to just $245,000 in 2009. Housing finance isn’t the only area of the economy in which black Americans have encountered racism recently. In fact, labor market discrimination persists in subtle forms to this day. In their 2005 best-seller Freakonomics, University of Chicago economist Steven Levitt and journalist Steven Dubner wrote about an experiment in which they sent fake résumés to various workplaces with a variety of traditionally white-sounding or traditionally black-sounding names. They found that the résumés with white-sounding names got significantly more callbacks, implying that managers often have subtle racial biases in their hiring decisions despite laws forbidding racial employment discrimination. As you can see, America’s racial wealth gap originates from a labyrinthine series of racial injustices in both the public and private sectors. Its primary victims are, obviously, black Americans. But there’s a simple economic argument to be made that it makes all Americans poorer, regardless of their skin color… How the Gap Is Making America Poorer In my [previous Wealth Daily article,]( I touched on the multiplier effect of consumer spending. Consumer spending accounts for more than 70% of U.S. GDP — largely because each dollar you spend creates several dollars in total economic output. When you buy a snack at a convenience store, the store owner gains a dollar and can then spend that dollar on his own wants and needs. Multiple people are enriched by the transaction. Conversely, when people don’t spend money — because they don’t have as much of it due to systemic inequalities, for instance — the lack of spending depresses GDP by more than the amount that would’ve been spent. In other words, if we somehow magically erased the racial wealth gap in this country, consumer spending would be significantly higher, and the American economy would grow significantly faster. Consulting firm McKinsey studied the hypothetical impact of closing the racial wealth gap in a 2019 report and found that it would increase GDP by 4% to 6% in the next decade. [racial wealth gap, 3] Source: McKinsey However, it’s worth repeating that these hypothetical scenarios involve a quick elimination of the racial wealth gap in the next few years. How would we accomplish that, exactly? [Could All 50 States Really Legalize Cannabis?]( Now, I’ll be honest... if you’d said just a few months back that I’d be talking to you today about the possibility of all 50 U.S. States legalizing cannabis in one massive wave... Well, I would have said: “you’re crazy!” But times have changed, and quite suddenly. COVID-19 has done an incredible amount of damage this country — and states have been hit especially hard. They’re hemorrhaging money. And the outlook for state tax revenue continues to only get worse. This is where cannabis comes in: with the stroke of a pen, states can legalize cannabis and create a brand-new stream of tax revenue — instantly. States aren’t the Federal government. They can’t print money to get themselves out of the hole they’re in. For states, new streams of tax revenue are the only way out. A sudden wave of new state legalizations is certain to create an unprecedented cannabis boom: and early investors will make a complete fortune. It could happen much faster than you think — [let me explain how to get in while there’s still time.]( Paths Forward I certainly don’t have the answer, and I’m not going to speculate about it here. That’s partially because, as a white guy, I don’t have personal experiences of economic racism. I didn’t grow up in a redlined neighborhood, I’ve never taken out a subprime loan, and I highly doubt that the name “Samuel Taube” has scared off any potential employers throughout my career. Instead, below I’m going to highlight some economics and personal finance books by black authors who are better informed on this topic than I. In The Black Tax: The Cost of Being Black in America, entrepreneur and philanthropist Shawn Rochester attempts to estimate the percentage of income black earners lose due to racial discrimination — the titular “black tax.” He then lays out a framework that Americans can use to eliminate this “tax” and help create an estimated 6 million jobs and 1.4 million businesses that are missing from the black community Journalist Shomari Wills is the author of Black Fortunes: The Story of the First Six African Americans Who Escaped Slavery and Became Millionaires. The book examines the 19th century stories of Mary Ellen Pleasant, Robert Reed Church, Hannah Elias, Annie Turnbo-Malone, O. W. Gurley, and Madame C. J. Walker as case studies of black entrepreneurs who built fortunes in the face of extraordinary disadvantages. And on the personal finance side of things, Starting Point: How to Create Wealth That Lasts is worth a read. In it, financial coach, teacher, and first-generation college graduate Kevin L. Matthews lays out a clear path, based on his own experiences, for average Americans of any race to build wealth with simple budgeting and investment techniques. Here at Angel Publishing, we strive to enrich readers regardless of their skin color and contribute to a mutually prosperous future in the process. Until next time, [Monica Savaglia] Samuel Taube Samuel Taube brings years of experience researching ETFs, cryptocurrencies, muni bonds, value stocks, and more to [Wealth Daily](. He has been writing for investment newsletters since 2013 and has penned articles accurately predicting financial market reactions to Brexit, the election of Donald Trump, and more. Samuel holds a degree in economics from the University of Maryland, and his investment approach focuses on finding undervalued assets at every point in the business cycle and then reaping big returns when they recover. To learn more about Samuel, [click here](. Enjoy reading this article? [Click here]( to like it and receive similar articles to read! Browse Our Archives [Find Winning Stocks by Eliminating the Losers]( [We Are Hiring]( [Vroom Is Public]( [American Powder Keg: Why Racial Tension is a Legitimate Market Risk]( [What the New Coronavirus Bill Means for You]( --------------------------------------------------------------- This email was sent to {EMAIL}. It is not our intention to send email to anyone who doesn't want it. If you're not sure why you've received this e-letter, or no longer wish to receive it, you may [unsubscribe here](, and view our privacy policy and information on how to manage your subscription. To ensure that you receive future issues of Wealth Daily, please add newsletter@wealthdaily.com to your address book or whitelist within your spam settings. For customer service questions or issues, please contact us for assistance. [Wealth Daily](, Copyright © 2020, [Angel Publishing LLC](. All rights reserved. 3 E Read Street Baltimore, MD 21202. The content of this site may not be redistributed without the express written consent of Angel Publishing. Individual editorials, articles and essays appearing on this site may be republished, but only with full attribution of both the author and Wealth Daily as well as a link to www.wealthdaily.com. Your privacy is important to us -- we will never rent or sell your e-mail or personal information. [View our privacy policy here.]( No statement or expression of opinion, or any other matter herein, directly or indirectly, is an offer or the solicitation of an offer to buy or sell the securities or financial instruments mentioned. While we believe the sources of information to be reliable, we in no way represent or guarantee the accuracy of the statements made herein. [Wealth Daily]( does not provide individual investment counseling, act as an investment advisor, or individually advocate the purchase or sale of any security or investment. Neither the publisher nor the editors are registered investment advisors. Subscribers should not view this publication as offering personalized legal or investment counseling. Investments recommended in this publication should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company in question. ---------------------------------------------------------------