On April 22, a now familiar sight blasted into the skies over Southern Florida: one of SpaceX's Falcon 9 rockets, accelerating into low Earth orbit for the fourth time in 2020.
On April 22, a now familiar sight blasted into the skies over Southern Florida: one of SpaceX's Falcon 9 rockets, accelerating into low Earth orbit for the fourth time in 2020.
[Wealth Daily logo]
The Unknown Truth Behind Elon's Bizarre Behavior
[Alex Koyfman Photo] By [Alex Koyfman](
Written May 21, 2020
Dear Reader,
On April 22, at 3:30 p.m. EST, a now familiar sight blasted into the skies over Southern Florida: one of SpaceX's Falcon 9 rockets, accelerating into low Earth orbit for the fourth time in 2020.
This flight contained not one, not two, but 60 of the company's relatively tiny Starlink satellites, bringing the total in orbit up to an impressive 422.
[falcon9]
This may seem like a lot of equipment to be putting into orbit, but it pales in comparison to Elon Musk's eventual plans for the Starlink constellation.
Originally, SpaceX had been cleared to put no fewer than 12,000 of these 500-pound communications satellites in orbit, between 200 and 800 miles above the Earth's surface.
[starlink]
Recently, however, the company applied for an expansion of the program, adding a staggering 30,000 Starlink terminals to the constellation to bring the total number to 42,000.
To put things into perspective, there are currently just over 2,200 human-made satellites orbiting the Earth total — one-fifth of which are already SpaceX units.
Soon, the Starlink network will cover the entire low Earth orbital layer like a loosely woven blanket.
[starlink]
Of course, such an ambitious program has had its share of critics, the most vocal of which have been ground-based astronomists who are none too thrilled about the prospect of glowing dotted lines, such as the one pictured below, interfering with their nighttime observations. Yes, this is an actual photo of a passing Starlink constellation.
Buyout Imminent?
The string of big buyout deals in this space is simply staggering.
Huge tech companies are showering small firms with billions of dollars...
And this $5 company from Santa Ana could be next.
[Click here now for the full details.](
[starlink]
You can already observe these luminescent caravans circling the Earth if you live in the Northern U.S. or Canada, or in any place that falls into that same general latitudinal plane. But with only 1% of the total planned number of glowing dots in the sky, it's hard to imagine what the final picture will look like from the ground.
Nevertheless, progress is progress, and when fully operational, the Starlink network will provide high-speed internet access to the remotest parts of the world.
Never shy about responding to his detractors, Elon Musk has already publicly stated an intention to implement less reflective materials in future Starlink unit construction, in hopes of alleviating some of the light pollution.
That said, the triumph for SpaceX, and for its world renowned founder and CEO, has been solidified. SpaceX is by far the world's biggest private satellite owner and operator, and that standing will only expand as the Starlink network prepares to go online later this year.
In Other Elon Musk News, However...
While it is a victory, it's also a very convenient distraction from a problem that's far bigger and far less manageable than processions of twinkling dots in the night sky.
Elon Musk's biggest venture, Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA), is looking at a problem that just might pose an existential threat — not just to the company but to the future of all electrical vehicle manufacturers.
And the problem lies at the very heart of each and every EV on the road today: The motors which power these vehicles are hopelessly outdated.
We've all seen the incredible acceleration of Tesla's top-of-the-line Model S, (0-60 in less than 2.5 seconds). We've even seen one of Tesla's recently introduced rivals, the Porsche Taycan, edge this already impressive figure out by .1 seconds.
And we've seen the driving ranges of all electric cars gradually improve over the years, but all of these innovations are mere minor details compared to the fundamental flaw inherent in each of the drive motors.
You see, almost every electric motor in service today, from the ones that give your smartphone its vibration function to the giant units driving the world's biggest ships is, in essence, just an updated version of Michael Faraday's first prototype — a design dating all the way back to the 1820s.
A Quiet Crisis Emerges
The shortcoming in Faraday's design is in the copper coil — that bundle of wire tightly wound around the axle of every electric motor ever built.
The problem is that the flow of electrical charge is not regulated in any way, shape, or form. This nature means that every electric motor in existence only performs at its most efficient at a specific speed.
If the RPMs creep higher or lower than this predetermined speed, the motor will start to lose power.
Up until now, few have felt this flaw, and even fewer have complained about it.
It didn't become a real issue until a company based in British Columbia invented a method for regulating the charge.
The moment that happened, every electric motor in existence, in effect, became an antique.
THE NEXT FAANG
A new tech “supergroup” just stole the keys to an untapped $100 trillion market, way bigger than 5G, streaming video, electric cars, and cryptocurrency... COMBINED!
Early shareholders could see the chance for life-changing 2,500% profits. [Go HERE for details.](
This company created a 21st century artificial intelligence approach to what had been a very 19th century problem. With complex algorithms regulating the flow of electrons into the copper coil, electric motors could run faster while generating more torque, with an edge of up to 8% over existing designs.
That not only meant more power but also longer service lives... fewer breakdowns... decreased operational costs.
And that's only one-half of the equation.
Every Wind Turbine, Every Hydroelectric Dam, Every Nuclear Power Plant...
The exact same innovation was equally applicable to electric generators, which are nothing more than electric motors mounted in reverse. Instead of the charge going in to turn the copper-wound axle, an external force is applied to the axle and the charge comes out.
With 99% of the world's electricity coming out of generators, this 8% advantage makes every existing "dumb" generator a museum piece.
This sounds like great news, but for companies like Tesla, it's a potentially fatal wound.
Remachining their factories to produce these next-gen motors is just one part of the problem. The bigger issue is that Tesla doesn't own the patent.
A small, relatively unknown company in Western Canada does, and it's already starting to partner up with manufacturers to put these advanced motors into consumer products.
It's been a quiet revolution up until now, but that won't last forever... And the company's stock, which is already trading publicly, won't stay at the COVID-19-depressed prices much longer.
Want more information? I've got a full [research report]( covering this company, its technology, and what it means to the future of electric motors and electric power generation.
[Click here for instant access.](
Fortune favors the bold,
[alex koyfman Signature]
Alex Koyfman
[[follow basic]@AlexKoyfman on Twitter](
His flagship service, Microcap Insider, provides market-beating insights into some of the fastest moving, highest profit-potential companies available for public trading on the U.S. and Canadian exchanges. With more than 5 years of track record to back it up, Microcap Insider is the choice for the growth-minded investor. Alex contributes his thoughts and insights regularly to [Wealth Daily](. To learn more about Alex, [click here](.
Enjoy reading this article? [Click here]( to like it and receive similar articles to read!
Browse Our Archives
[The Greatest Investment I Ever Made Returned $0](
[The Race for a Vaccine](
[Another Wall Street Handout](
[The HEROES Act: Are You Getting Another Coronavirus Check?](
[The Market Always Sucks in a Few More Rubes](
---------------------------------------------------------------
This email was sent to {EMAIL}. It is not our intention to send email to anyone who doesn't want it. If you're not sure why you've received this e-letter, or no longer wish to receive it, you may [unsubscribe here](, and view our privacy policy and information on how to manage your subscription.
To ensure that you receive future issues of Wealth Daily, please add newsletter@wealthdaily.com to your address book or whitelist within your spam settings. For customer service questions or issues, please contact us for assistance.
[Wealth Daily](, Copyright © 2020, [Angel Publishing LLC](. All rights reserved. 3 E Read Street Baltimore, MD 21202. The content of this site may not be redistributed without the express written consent of Angel Publishing. Individual editorials, articles and essays appearing on this site may be republished, but only with full attribution of both the author and Wealth Daily as well as a link to www.wealthdaily.com. Your privacy is important to us -- we will never rent or sell your e-mail or personal information. [View our privacy policy here.]( No statement or expression of opinion, or any other matter herein, directly or indirectly, is an offer or the solicitation of an offer to buy or sell the securities or financial instruments mentioned. While we believe the sources of information to be reliable, we in no way represent or guarantee the accuracy of the statements made herein. [Wealth Daily]( does not provide individual investment counseling, act as an investment advisor, or individually advocate the purchase or sale of any security or investment. Neither the publisher nor the editors are registered investment advisors. Subscribers should not view this publication as offering personalized legal or investment counseling. Investments recommended in this publication should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company in question.