Newsletter Subject

Stop AI Takeover in 6 Months or Less

From

wallstreetoasis.com

Email Address

wallstreetoasis@wallstreetoasis.com

Sent On

Fri, Mar 31, 2023 11:38 AM

Email Preheader Text

Mar 31, 2023 | Peel #431 Silver banana goes to... Market Snapshot Happy Friday, apes. Maybe it’

[The Daily Peel... ]( Mar 31, 2023 | Peel #431 Silver banana goes to... [Wander. ]() Market Snapshot Happy Friday, apes. Maybe it’s the Final Four coming up on Saturday or the MLB beginning yesterday, but regardless, something’s put a risk-all-the-way-on vibe back into markets. The past two weeks’ 5.2% gain got us feeling like summer 2020 again, apes. Okay, not really, like at all…but we’ll take all the green we can get. Equities generally gained modestly yesterday as large-cap, non-financial names led the way. Breadth held up decently, especially in the Nasdaq 100, with 81 of 101 listed tickers positing a positive day. The regular Nasdaq, S&P, and Dow all joined hands and put up a solid day as green as the Boston Celtics. The risk-on mood kept up over in the boring ol’ bond world as well, with yields mostly lower despite a respectable rise in the market-implied odds of another 25 bps hike in May moving higher to make things about 50/50 with the chances of no move. Safe to say the games have begun. Let’s get into it. [image]() [Wander.com,]() with >150K active members and 93% guest satisfaction rating, announces the launch of the first Vacation Rental REIT. With Wander REIT, accredited investors can earn passive income, diversify their portfolio and unlock targeted 8% annual dividend and 14% total return –– by owning a piece of a portfolio that combines hotel quality with vacation-home comfort. Banana Bits - Goldilocks, is that you? [Jobless claims](=) gain hella mildly, showing the labor market isn’t in full-blown recession (yet) while still looser than it has been in recent months - Like how 3rd graders “flirt” with each other, 45th President Donnie T and Democrats across the country can’t stop bullying each other as the former Pres becomes the first to ever [face criminal charges](…all I know is that you can cut the sexual tension with a knife - Final estimates for [GDP in Q4]( suggest the vibes were mellow as we apparently accelerated at just an annualized rate of 2.6% over the period - Richard Branson is having a terrible week as his pet project Virgin Orbit will effectively [cease to exist]( and layoff all but about 100 employees Macro Monkey Says Homes, Not Homies Not to be controversial, but we here at the Peel are anti-homelessness. As a result, one of our very favorite things is a healthy housing market. Let’s see how that’s going. The correct answer is “me” - for now - in case you’re wondering. In recent days, we’ve had an absolute slew of data pouring in across the housing sector. Now that we’re in one of those weird times for market watchers where there are few marketwide catalysts ongoing, yet everyone is still glued to FinTwit waiting for any kind of meaningful update. It’s not gonna get better for a good bit either, unless, of course, another bank fails or something (fingers crossed!), with most market junkies waiting until at least next Friday’s jobs report for their much-needed fix. Still, we got some mortgage data on Wednesday, along with pricing updates the day prior. To sum it up, buyers were pleased while sellers were, well, not. The Case-Shiller US National Home Price Index gained just 3.8% in January (yeah, I know it’s basically April. It’s a lagging indicator, okay?) as opposed to gains of 5.6% in December. It might not seem like much, but homes are generally a particularly difficult asset to knock down in price, especially given selling dynamics, with most homeowners utterly refusing to take a loss, or even a markdown from recent highs, on their home. Buyers, on the other hand, are rejoicing at the slight interest rate reprieve seen in recent weeks and jumping all over it, apparently. From highs of 7.1% set a few months ago, 30-year averaged fixed rates have fallen to about 6.3% as of Wednesday. This is, of course, still higher than the 6.1% set in the beginning of February, but the point is that the downturn confirms a reversal of the steady rise seen in the past two months. Lower rates naturally spur buying activity and, even with prices still rising, will motivate marginal buyers to move across a population so large. An interesting trend could be emerging at the same time. Some major cities, almost entirely concentrated on the West coast, fell big time in the year ending January 2023. San Fran homes saw declines of 7.6% while (kinda) nearby cities like Seattle (-5.6%), Portland (-0.5%), and Ron Burgundy’s hometown of San Diego (-0.1%) sank for their own part as well. Can’t blame ‘em, really; who would want to live in a region where you gotta be up by 6:30 am to catch the market open? Couldn’t be me, don’t care how nice the weather is. Anyway, Western cities from SD to Boise saw a far more impactful homebuying boom over the C-19 years while people mostly fled the dense, dirty, yet pinnacle-of-civilization cities on the Atlantic coast. So I guess it only makes sense that every one of the 12 major metros West of Austin, TX, registered home price declines to start 2023 while they increased in all 37 of the largest metros East of Colorado (excluding the weirdos in Austin, ofc). This can be argued as a sign of normalization finally starting to show its face. At the same time, the still-egregious mortgage rates may actually be putting the Fed in a self-induced inflationary spiral. Think about it. As mortgage rates rise on the back of the fed funds rate, you discourage homebuying. In the same stroke, you encourage renting, thus increasing demand and, therefore, prices of rentals. Given housing costs, including “owner’s equivalent rent,” drive nearly 1/3rd of CPI and carry a plethora of downstream impacts pulling service costs higher, it doesn’t take a genius to see how 475 bps of hiking in 12 months might hurt a bit. To anyone out there looking to be happy with the price, you buy or sell at, good luck. F*ck bulls and bears, this market just seems miserable. What's Ripe Evgo ($EVGO) ↑ 22.09% ↑ - When boomer a** new technology haters decide they want to harass EV owners for the day, one of the common tropes is that you can’t “just go fill up your tank” at any of the zillion gas stations across the country. - Meanwhile, Evgo is tearing down that argument more and more each day. The EV charging station maker saw shares catch quite the buzz yesterday on the back of stellar Q4 results and forward guidance. - Sales came in ~35% above expectations, while the firm’s $20.1mn in EBITDA losses were still ~4mn less than analysts had expected the company to set on fire. Numbers like these were more than enough to electrify investors, to say the least. C3.ai ($AI) ↑ 6.35% ↑ - Investing is hard. We all know this, and obviously, as a result, that’s why the strategy of just simply buying the company whose ticker represents the hyped-up-tech du jour can never be a winning strategy, right? - Wrong. For the millionth reason in 2023 alone, you might as well just set your Finance 101 textbooks on fire and drop out. With barely any material news to back it, shares in this obscure AI maker have boomed 150% this year alone. - This time, the firm’s sizable single-day rise can mostly (probably?) be attributed to the “[Pls Stop AI]()” letter that Elon and other people who are way smarter than me and you signed in recent days. Basically, it seems that the Street sees this letter as confirmation the tech is valid rather than the fear-mongering letter of warning it’s meant to be. Glad to see where our priorities are! What's Rotten Bed, Bath, & Beyond ($BBBY) ↓ 26.23% ↓ - At this point, talking about Bed, Bath, & Bankrupt in any way, shape, or form just feels like bullying. But alas, we do what we gotta do. - As this company’s shareholder base seems primarily made up of 12-year-olds and “deep value” fraudsters, Bed and Bath is once again voicing concerns over potential bankruptcy if its newly announced $300mn equity sale sh*ts the bed. - Although, if this thing goes like any of the firm’s other recent financing attempts, it may have to change its sheets already. The $565mn in debt financing the firm raised last year has already fallen to a value of $300mn, while the company’s $225mn offering in February couldn’t get the job done either. - Basically, this might be the only company having a worse 2023 than SVB…it looks like some parts of the market just don’t know it yet. Charles Schwab ($SCHW) ↓ 4.96% ↓ - If you were one of those “geniuses” who just “knew” they should buy Schwab shares after the firm’s 31% fall but didn’t upon seeing the next day’s insider-buying induced +20% gain, well, here’s your chance. - Like every other ticker in the sector, $SCHW plummeted alongside the SVB collapse. Shares ripped in the days following as insiders began buying on the cheap, but now, shares are up only about 1% off those lows after yesterday’s 5% crash. - This time, shareholders can thank the analysts at Morgan Stanley for the decline as the firm slapped a fat downgrade on Schwab shares on account of worse-than-expected cash management. Haters gonna hate, but like we said, all you geniuses out there have been given another chance. You buyin’? Thought Banana Big Sigh in AI “...profound risks to society and humanity” is quite the attention grabber on its own, but when you find out the likes of Elon Musk, Steve Wozniak, Andrew Yang, and thousands of others are behind the statement, sh*t starts to get a little concerning. Just over a week ago, the Future of Life Institute, a non-profit organization focused on the reduction of existential and catastrophic risks with an emphasis on AI, biotech, nukes, and climate change, published an [open letter]() to anyone with two thumbs and a sufficiently intelligent AI system to pls stop…for the next 6 months. The FLI is backed by the likes of Elon Musk, Sam Harris, Vitalik Buterin, and plenty of others. Primarily conducting research and publishing a whole lot of “Open Letters,” the organization intends to bring well-deserved attention to the issues raised above as well as others. The point is: this team is legit. Essentially, these big-name tech nerds worried about AI are asking their fellow nerdy brethren to chill tf out on developing such advanced artificial intelligence so fast. The primary claim is that we don’t yet have a comfortable degree of understanding of these things, and by extension, that means they could probably kill the sh*t out of us if they really wanted to. Maybe that’s a bit hyperbolic, but experts allege this tech could one day be to us as we are to chimpanzees (or even ants), so is hyperbole even possible here? The letter goes on to beg AI developers to consult with policymakers as well as collaborate with fellow industry magnates in a transparent, *safe* way that ensures we don’t make a big oopsie and accidentally create the Terminator. Honestly, this thing seems directed at 3 people in particular: Sundar Pichai, Satya Nadella, and, most of all, Sam Altman. The CEOs of Google, Microsoft, and OpenAI (formerly a non-profit, now a controversial capped-profit org), respectively, appear as of now to be leading the AI development wave. If it’s not intended for them, who else could possibly make any kind of a difference outside of formalized legislation? Speaking of which, legislation is encouraged if industry leaders aren’t able to not kill us all on their own. I mean, ChatGPT, supposedly the best of the best, did just tell me that it “...cannot predict the future or provide financial advice or recommendations for specific stocks.” If this thing can’t give me the next 10-bagger on the spot, then it clearly isn’t half as smart as all of you apes, so what are we really worried about? The big question: (When) Will AI come to upend life as we know it? What legislation and other guardrails can we put in place to not all die? How worried should we be at this point? Banana Brain Teaser Yesterday — I was carried into a dark room and set on fire. I wept, and then my head was cut off. What am I? A candle. Today — It’s 50 bananas off the [PE Deals Process Course](=) for the first 3 correct respondents. LFG! What type of cheese is made backwards? Shoot us your guesses at [vyomesh@wallstreetoasis.com](mailto:vyomesh@wallstreetoasis.com?subject=Banana%20Brain%20Teaser) with the subject line “Banana Brain Teaser” or simply [click here to reply!](mailto:vyomesh@wallstreetoasis.com?subject=Banana%20Brain%20Teaser) Wise Investor Says “Investing is about having an edge. You don’t have to be the smartest person in the world; you just have to be slightly smarter than the person on the other side of the trade.” — Chamath Palihapitiya How would you rate today’s Peel? [All the bananas]() [Decent]() [Rotten AF](=) Happy Investing, Patrick & The Daily Peel Team Was this email forwarded to you? Sign up for the WSO Daily Peel [here](. [ADVERTISE](=) // [WSO ALPHA]() // [COURSES](=) // [LEGAL](=) Don't want The Daily Peel? [Unsubscribe here](. Click to [Unsubscribe]( from ALL WSO content IB Oasis Corp. (aka "Wall Street Oasis") 20705 Saint Charles St Saratoga, California 95070 United States

EDM Keywords (231)

yet yesterday would worse worried world wondering wept well weirdos wednesday weather way warning want vibes value us unsubscribe understanding type time ticker thousands things thing thank tell tech tearing team tank take svb sum stroke strategy starts spot society smart signed sign side show shares sh set sellers sell seems see sd say saturday said risk reversal result rejoicing region reduction recommendations quite putting put publishing priorities price portfolio population policymakers point plethora plenty pleased place piece person people peel parts part owning others opposed one obviously nice never might mellow meant means maybe may markets market markdown make lows loss looking live likes like letter less legislation leading layoff launch large know knock knew kind jumping intended increased hyped humanity homies hometown homes hiking highs head hard happy hand half guesses guess guardrails green gotta got going glad give get geniuses genius generally gdp games gains future form fli first firm fire find fed february fast far fallen face extension expected expectations existential exist even ensures enough encouraged emphasis emerging elon edge drop dow die developing decline december day cut cpi country controversial consult confirmation company collaborate click clearly chimpanzees cheese cheap change chances ceos catch case carry carried care buyers buy boomer bit best behind beginning bears bath barely backed back attributed asking argument argued apparently apes anyone analysts alas ai across account able 81 565mn 37 35 300mn

Marketing emails from wallstreetoasis.com

View More
Sent On

03/12/2024

Sent On

02/12/2024

Sent On

12/08/2024

Sent On

17/07/2024

Sent On

16/07/2024

Sent On

15/07/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.