China’s ever-tighter grip on Hong Kong

Plus: Parents are profiting off child influencers, Biden and Bibi are on a collision course, and more. March 13, 2024 [View in browser]( Good morning! Editorial director Bryan Walsh takes us to Hong Kong, where national security laws and democracy are going from bad to worse. —Caroline Houck, senior editor of news   [Members of the League of Social Democrats hold up a banner which reads ''Without democracy, there can be no livelihood, ''Put the people above the country, human rights above the regime. There can be no national security without democracy and human rights.''] Peter Parks/AFP via Getty Images 20 years ago, Hong Kong fought for self-rule. Today, it's over. Last week, the government of Hong Kong [published]( the latest of a series of increasingly draconian national security laws. This one will target espionage, treason, and foreign political interference, and those found guilty of violating some of its tenets could be [sentenced to life imprisonment](. This might sound niche or even well-intentioned; doesn’t the US have its own fears about foreign political interference in its elections? But this isn't really about national security. It is, as [Human Rights Watch put it](, “Beijing’s latest effort to transform Hong Kong from a free society to an oppressed one where people live in fear.” That effort has been underway at varying speeds since Hong Kong was returned to Beijing’s control in 1997. It is now all but complete. Despite [complaints]( from foreign governments, from what remains of [Hong Kong civil society](, and even from the city’s increasingly beleaguered [international business community](, Hong Kong’s now opposition-less legislature will [almost assuredly fast-track it into law](. For Hong Kong’s 7.4 million citizens, the multi-year fight to maintain some semblance of self-government and political rights is all but over. There is no news here. But the name of this new legislation — Article 23 — will jog the memory of anyone who has lived in or observed Hong Kong over the past quarter-century. It’s a name that was once a symbol of Hong Kongers’ refusal to submit to Beijing’s will and their willingness to take to the streets to fight for their liberty. The backstory of Hong Kong’s Article 23 Article 23 is found in Hong Kong’s Basic Law, a city constitution of sorts worked out between Beijing and the British government in the years leading up to Hong Kong’s return to Chinese rule. It [states](, among other things, that Hong Kong’s government will “enact laws on its own to prohibit any ahct of treason, secession, sedition, subversion against the Central People’s Government” in Beijing. It wasn’t until nearly six years after the 1997 handover that Hong Kong’s government, with more than a little nudging from Beijing, made a serious effort to pass a law that would fulfill Article 23. Legislation was drafted in February 2003 that, among other provisions, would have allowed the Hong Kong government to ban any organization if it had links to organizations banned in China for national security reasons. That alarmed pro-democracy groups in Hong Kong, where hundreds of thousands of people from China had found refuge following the Chinese Communist Party’s takeover of the mainland in 1949, as well as the city’s vibrant Christian churches, which feared being forced out of existence. But there were fears that went beyond the text of the legislation. [More than half a million Hong Kong people take to the streets in a landmark anti-Article 23 protest rally in July 2003] David Wong/South China Morning Post via Getty Images The relationship between Hong Kong and China after the former’s return was defined by the phrase “one country, two systems.” Formulated by former Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping, who had a [knack for pithy political expressions](, this meant in practice that Hong Kong would be largely left to run under its own system of laws — including general civil liberties like freedom of speech and press — while acknowledging that ultimately, Hong Kong was part of the Chinese state. So Hong Kongers were always on the lookout for signs that “two systems” was becoming one. The introduction of Article 23 legislation in 2003 was that sign. Still, what could they do about it? The British — who, let’s not forget, had never allowed Hong Kong anything like full democracy — were long gone. They might be a [Special Administrative Region]( and have their own passports, but they were part of the People’s Republic of China. And in any case, Hong Kong was a city built on trade, not politics. Its business was business. Then came July 1, 2003. The march — and what came after On what was a brutally hot day even for a Hong Kong summer, as many as 500,000 Hong Kongers took to the streets to oppose the Article 23 legislation. It was the [largest such protest in the city]( since hundreds of thousands had marched against the Tiananmen Square massacre in 1989. I was there, walking among the marchers as a young reporter for Time magazine. It was a cross-section of the Hong Kong I knew — young families, elderly men and women who had once come from the mainland themselves, teenagers at their first protest. They were angry about the Article 23 legislation, about the way their government had mismanaged the SARS outbreak earlier that year, and about the dwindling opportunities for good jobs and decent housing. But what I remember was the pride present in the crowd. They were proud of their identity as Hong Kongers, as a people with a distinct language, a distinct culture, and, yes, distinct rights. They took to the streets because they would not allow that identity and those rights to be taken from them without a fight. And they won, at least temporarily. The Article 23 legislation was eventually shelved. But not forever. By the 2010s, with the less pragmatic and more autocratic Xi Jinping leading China, Beijing [began to squeeze](. Legislation was introduced to bring “moral and national education” to Hong Kong’s curriculum, code for Beijing's view of history, and what limited representation existed in the city’s legislature was further constrained. At every turn, Hong Kongers returned to the streets in protest, most famously in the “Umbrella Revolution” of 2014. They won some battles and became a symbol of the global fight for democracy. But it was a war they couldn’t win. Xi Jinping had no interest in two systems — only his. And with every year, the room for free expression was further curtailed until there was no room at all. The new Article 23 legislation merely confirms that fact. For one day, though, in July 2003 — and on many days that would follow — Hong Kongers showed what it was to act on freedom. [—Bryan Walsh, editorial director](   [Listen]( The real fight over fake meat Americans are eating more meat than ever, and it’s wreaking havoc on the environment. Lab-grown meat could be the solution — if only manufacturers can overcome technological setbacks and political blowback. [Listen now](   AROUND THE WORLD - Israel and the US are on a “collision course”: Over whether the former launches a military operation in Rafah, the southern Gaza city where more than 1 million Palestinians are sheltering. Also of note: Biden and Netanyahu haven’t spoken in almost a month. [[Axios](] - Haiti’s prime minister is out. Here’s how it got so bad: Ariel Henry announced his resignation Tuesday — the culmination of a political crisis at least two weeks in the making, but really three years or more. [[Vox](] - Israeli troops allegedly blindfolded and repeatedly beat Palestinian medical staff: Medics told the BBC they were detained and abused after a raid at a hospital in Nasser last month. [[BBC](] [biden and netanyahu] Miriam Alster/AFP via Getty Images MONEY - The gross world of parents profiting off their child influencers: “In the unregulated world of vloggers, children are, for the most part, not entitled to a single cent they help earn.” [[Cosmopolitan](] - Should you round up to donate to charity at checkout?: Yes, some corporations have been [sued for using customer donations to meet their philanthropic pledges](. But companies [can’t use them to dodge their taxes](. And those donations are now driving millions to charities. [[NPR](] CHILDREN - How not to raise a jerk: Five ways adults can help boys become good men. [[Vox](] - Maybe … don’t do this: Pediatricians are concerned about the increasing number of parents delaying their offspring’s childhood vaccinations. [[LA Times](]   Ad  [Learn more about RevenueStripe...](   The bleeding edge Periods and menstrual fluid have long been overlooked by scientists. Now, researchers are starting to suspect they might be sources of medical treasure. [Listen now](   Are you enjoying the Today, Explained newsletter? Forward it to a friend; they can [sign up for it right here](. And as always, we want to know what you think. We recently changed the format of this newsletter. Any questions, comments, or ideas? We're all ears. Specifically: If there is a topic you want us to explain or a story you’re curious to learn more about, let us know [by filling out this form]( or just replying to this email. Today's edition was edited and produced by Caroline Houck. We'll see you tomorrow!   Ad  [Learn more about RevenueStripe...](   [Facebook]( [Twitter]( [YouTube]( [Instagram]( [TikTok]( [WhatsApp]( This email was sent to {EMAIL}. Manage your [email preferences]( [unsubscribe](param=sentences). If you value Vox’s unique explanatory journalism, support our work with a one-time or recurring [contribution](. View our [Privacy Notice]( and our [Terms of Service](. Vox Media, 1701 Rhode Island Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20036. Copyright © 2024. All rights reserved.