Newsletter Subject

The special counsel and Joe Biden's memory

From

vox.com

Email Address

newsletter@vox.com

Sent On

Fri, Feb 9, 2024 12:18 PM

Email Preheader Text

Plus: Super Bowl weekend, goodbye to Zelenskyy's top general, and more. February 9, 2024 Happy Frida

Plus: Super Bowl weekend, goodbye to Zelenskyy's top general, and more. February 9, 2024 [View in browser]( Happy Friday! Vox's senior politics correspondent Andrew Prokop is here to explain the special counsel's report deciding not to charge Biden for mishandling of Obama-era classified documents. —Caroline Houck, senior editor of news   [Joe Biden speaking into microphones at a lectern in front of US flags.] Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images Why was there a special counsel report on Biden’s memory? Both [Joe Biden]( and [Donald Trump]( are [old]( and [speak less fluidly]( than they [used]( to. When speaking, both have a tendency to [forget]( [things]( or [mix up]( [names](. But though Trump is being prosecuted in four different criminal cases, he has not yet been unlucky enough to have a special counsel publicly weigh in on his mental fitness. Biden’s the one who now has that problem. Special counsel Robert Hur was appointed to investigate why classified documents from the Obama administration were found [at Biden’s home and office]( in 2022. The documents were voluntarily returned to the government. But after their return (and amidst the investigation into Trump's classified documents), Attorney General Merrick Garland opened an investigation into how they got there and why, and eventually appointed Hur to oversee it. Hur has now concluded his investigation by recommending no criminal charges. He concluded that while Biden had "willfully" retained the documents, the evidence fell short of charging him with a crime, and that he would not have recommended charges even if sitting presidents didn't have temporary immunity. Yet in his [report](, released Wednesday, Hur made repeated assertions about what he calls Biden’s “faulty memory” and even “diminished faculties.” He says that when his team interviewed Biden last October, the president repeatedly failed to remember the years in which certain major life events happened — for instance, the years his vice presidency started and ended. “He did not remember, even within several years, when his son Beau died,” the report says. Biden on Thursday night called an impromptu news conference where he [angrily denounced the report]( and disputed its characterization of his mental acuity. Some Democrats, meanwhile, said Hur’s report seemed designed to hurt Biden politically. (Hur had served as a US attorney under Trump, though it was Biden’s attorney general, Garland, who [appointed him special counsel](.) Biden’s attorneys disputed that the president’s “lack of recall of years-old events” was anything unusual, saying the report’s framing of Biden’s memory wasn’t “accurate or appropriate.” The whole situation was strikingly reminiscent of when the Justice Department wrapped up the investigation of [Hillary Clinton](’s emails without charges — but with then-FBI Director James Comey’s public criticism of Clinton as “extremely careless” in her handling of classified information. This time around, Republicans have long been trying to push a narrative that Biden is downright senile — that his mental functioning is much worse than we know, that he’s certainly much worse than Trump, and that the White House has been trying desperately to cover this up. Hur’s report may seem at first glance to bolster the GOP case. But on a closer read, the examples of Biden’s poor memory or verbal mix-ups are similar to verbal flubs Trump has publicly made in recent months. [Crowds gathered for the ''Stop the Steal'' rally on January 06, 2021 before storming the Capitol.] Mandel Ngan/AFP via Getty Images Biden’s memory vs. Trump’s memory Hur’s report repeatedly mentions Biden’s memory — saying that in their interview, he presented as a “sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory,” that he demonstrated “diminished faculties and a faulty memory,” and that he had “limited precision and recall.” Of course, investigators quizzing targets about years-old details [frequently get]( the response of, “I don’t recall” (genuine or not). But Hur makes this into a bigger deal by implying that Biden was forgetting really big things. The stated justification for mentioning all this is to justify Hur’s decision not to charge Biden for unlawfully retaining classified information — a jury, Hur claims, would likely find him sympathetic and not convict him. The report cites four examples, three of which are about naming specific years in which things happened. Biden got mixed up about which year his vice presidency ended, which year it began, and which year Beau died. The fourth example is that Biden purportedly claimed that during the 2009 [Afghanistan]( troop surge debate, he was at odds with one official, but they were actually in agreement. Hur claims this last one is a big deal because that debate “was once so important to Biden” — but by the time of their interview, it had occurred 14 years ago. The full context of this is difficult to judge without the entire transcript of Biden’s interview being released. Clearly, Biden is not very good at naming in which year things happened. That may be embarrassing, but is it disqualifying for the presidency? To assess that, we’d have to compare him to his opponent. Consider that all of the following has happened in recent months: - Trump has said either that Barack Obama is president or that he had run against Obama for the presidency at least seven times, [according to Forbes’s Sara Dorn](. - Trump [mixed up]( [Nikki Haley]( and Nancy Pelosi, claiming Haley was in charge of security at the US Capitol on January 6, 2021. - During a deposition, Trump identified a picture of E. Jean Carroll, who accused him of rape, as [a picture of his ex-wife]( Marla Maples. Is there any evidence that Biden’s age is affecting his governance? One reason the Hur report struck fear into the hearts of some Democrats is that many privately wonder if Biden really has been hit harder by his age than the White House is admitting. And one reason they’re wondering this is that the White House has tightly controlled Biden’s availability for public questioning. Biden gave fewer interviews and press conferences in his first two years [than any president in decades](. He has now declined the traditional pre-[Super Bowl]( interview[two years in a row](. Still, there’s no concrete evidence that Biden’s governing ability has been impacted. Biden aides tell reporters he [remains engaged and active]( behind the scenes, as we might expect. More interestingly, a [report from Politico]( claimed that former GOP speaker Kevin McCarthy told his allies that he found Biden “sharp and substantive” in private conversations. One structural problem for the White House is that when Biden does an interview and it [goes just fine](, it gets little attention. But if there is any verbal flub or mix-up, it goes viral as purported proof of Biden’s decline. So each public appearance is a risk. That was shown at Biden’s press conference last night, which went generally well. Though his answers were overall cogent and substantive, he did misspeak and say that “Sisi” — Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi — was the president of Mexico. Both of our presidential nominees-in-waiting are inexact speakers of advanced age who get mixed up on the facts. They’re also the nominees-in-waiting we have — and there’s no clear path to replacing either of them. —[Andrew Prokop, senior correspondent](   [Listen]( When one (airplane) door opens ... Missing bolts, door panels flying off in midair — and that’s not even on the planes that crashed. The Post’s Ian Duncan and the WSJ's Andrew Tangel explain why Boeing is a problem the FAA still hasn’t fixed. [Listen now](   SUPER BOWL 2024 - Am I starting the Super Bowl section with a Taylor Swift link? Yes. Does this count as Super Bowl content? Also yes. You know as well as I do that the Big Game isn’t just about the game. So read this and have something interesting to say about Swift if she shows up to support boyfriend Travis Kelce. [[Vox](] - What are you wearing to your watch party?: If you’re cool, it better be at least two decades old. [[NYT](] - Please stop perpetuating this myth: Bringing back a 2022 op-ed because this urban legend won’t die. Human trafficking is a serious, awful issue — yes. But it doesn’t peak around the Super Bowl. [[LA Times](] - Kelce is a media mogul in his own right: Mad props to [his managers](. But let’s dig in a little bit on one of the services he’s lent his image to. [[Insider](] [Travis Kelce and Taylor Swift.] Patrick Smith/Getty Images ALSO IN THE NEWS - Ukraine fires its top general: Zelenskyy removed Valery Zaluzhny as the country’s military commander-in-chief. The rank and file have some concerns about the new guy, whom they’ve reportedly called the “butcher” for his willingness to put soldiers in danger. [[Politico](] - Hilarious research study: As my colleague [Rebecca]( said, this is the academic version of the business card scene in American Psycho. [[X](]   Ad  [Learn more about RevenueStripe...](   Trump’s VP shortlist, explained Who's rumored to be in, and who isn't. Vox's Li Zhou lays out the list. //link.vox.com/click/34292180.34291/aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cudm94LmNvbS9lLzIzODI4MDI3P3VlaWQ9MzkzNTdhNzZmNmQwOGIxNjIzOWZkMmZmYTY1ZTljNmY/60917b13ac7e007ef63b32a8B65ade7c4[Read more](.   Are you enjoying the Today, Explained newsletter? Forward it to a friend; they can [sign up for it right here](. And as always, we want to know what you think. We recently changed the format of this newsletter. Any questions, comments, or ideas? We're all ears. Specifically: If there is a topic you want us to explain or a story you’re curious to learn more about, let us know [by filling out this form]( or just replying to this email. Your question might be the centerpiece of this newsletter one day or featured in a Friday reader mailbag. Today's edition was produced and edited by Caroline Houck. We'll see you Monday!   Ad  [Learn more about RevenueStripe...](   [Facebook]( [Twitter]( [YouTube]( [Instagram]( [TikTok]( [WhatsApp]( This email was sent to {EMAIL}. Manage your [email preferences]( [unsubscribe](param=sentences). If you value Vox’s unique explanatory journalism, support our work with a one-time or recurring [contribution](. View our [Privacy Notice]( and our [Terms of Service](. Vox Media, 1201 Connecticut Ave. NW, Floor 12, Washington, DC 20036. Copyright © 2024. All rights reserved.

Marketing emails from vox.com

View More
Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

05/12/2024

Sent On

03/12/2024

Sent On

29/11/2024

Sent On

27/11/2024

Sent On

27/11/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.