Newsletter Subject

People won't have kids even if you pay them

From

vox.com

Email Address

newsletter@vox.com

Sent On

Tue, Nov 28, 2023 08:00 PM

Email Preheader Text

Also: It's Giving Tuesday. ? Tuesday, November 28, 2023 Hi everyone, It’s Dylan Scott again,

Also: It's Giving Tuesday.   Tuesday, November 28, 2023 Hi everyone, It’s Dylan Scott again, looking out on an early snow here by Lake Erie. Here’s the agenda today: UP FIRST: You apparently can’t even pay people to have kids anymore CATCH UP: It’s Giving Tuesday!   UP FIRST The government can't convince people to have kids AM YEH/AFP via Getty Images Birth rates are dropping all over the world, and nobody seems to have great ideas for bringing them back up. The US birth rate has been in decline since the Great Recession; the developed countries of Europe and Asia have in some cases battled slowing population growth for decades. This is, at least in part, a result of improvements in people’s quality of life. People generally don’t depend on children economically like they used to, and scientific advances have made it easier to prevent unwanted pregnancies. Having kids is more of a choice than it has ever been. But fewer children being born does invite long-term risks. Economists warn of a “people shortage” in the future, in which the tax base of a shrinking working-age population is unable to support a growing number of seniors entitled in most developed nations to generous welfare. Older people often rely on younger family members to help care for them; there will be fewer sons and daughters, nieces and nephews around to share that burden. It’s a slow-rolling crisis but an important one. Worryingly, however, it has proven stubbornly resistant to interventions. - Governments across the world recognize the problem and they have tried to fix it. Taiwan has spent $3 billion on expanding its paid parental leave and tax breaks. It’s even held singles mixers. Austria gave new mothers two and a half years of maternity leave; Germany guaranteed a spot in public day care for every child over the age of 1. - But these policies don’t seem to convince people. They may alter behavior on the margins, particularly people’s decisions about when to have kids. But they “don’t ultimately affect the number of kids people have,” said Alison Gemmill, a professor of population, family, and reproductive health at Johns Hopkins University. - The world today gives people plenty of reasons not to have children. Experts say climate change, war, and the deterioration of democratic norms in parts of the developed world may be contributing to young people’s reluctance to procreate. The raw economics are also not helping. About a quarter of Americans say they have or plan to have fewer children than they ideally would, in large part because of the cost. - Experts worry about coercive policies meant to boost the birth rate. Iran has reversed its once-liberal contraception policy, cracking down on abortions and access to birth control to push people to have more babies. China has a history of authoritarian fertility policies; experts fear the country could punish women who don’t have enough children. - The focus instead should be on making it easier for people to have the families they want. Many experts believe that the best thing governments can do to increase birth rates is help people have as many kids as they want. Investments in maternal health care, paid family leave, and more support for child care are some of the obvious targets. Read the rest of [Anna North’s rundown on the failed experiments to stem the worldwide drop in birth rates](.   CATCH UP Your Giving Tuesday questions, answered Louise Gubb/Corbis via Getty Images It is that time of year again: After Black Friday and Cyber Monday comes Giving Tuesday, a chance to focus on giving to others instead of getting for ourselves. Vox’s Dylan Matthews [has an ambitious giving goal](, one he is urging readers to share: Donating 10 percent of income to highly effective charities. For the average American household, with an income of $75,000, that would be equivalent to $7,500 in donations in the year. That can feel like quite a lot — but it can go a long way. GiveWell, a nonprofit that evaluates charities' effectiveness, estimates that a $5,000 donation to its top charities fund can save one person’s life. I have been donating to GiveWell charities since I first read about them on Vox a few years ago. With an assist from our other Dylan, here’s an easy way to think about giving to charity: - Every donation can make a difference. Don’t sweat too much whether you’re giving 10 percent or 5 percent or even just 1 percent. You might see GiveWell’s $5,000 estimate above and think: A "mere" $750 donation isn’t making that big of a dent. If you keep giving year after year, your impact is going to add up. - Helping others is a team effort. The whole idea of charity is a collective coming together to support a worthy cause. If you do your part, and others do theirs, together we can make a change. If the world’s top 1 percent gave away 10 percent of their income, we could [extinguish extreme poverty worldwide](. - Make sure your donation counts. Part of what persuaded me to follow Dylan’s advice about giving to GiveWell specifically is I don’t want to see my money wasted and I’m sure you don’t either. GiveWell is rigorous about which charities are part of its top fund and their activities focus on the developing world, where there is more bang for one’s buck than in an already-wealthy country like the US. - GiveWell’s donations help people, but you can give to aid animals too. Dylan singles out [the Humane League]( as one of his favorite charities in this space, but you can also check out [the Animal Charity Evaluators]( for ideas about effective organizations that may be working on a project close to your heart.   VERBATIM 🗣️ “I think there is a little bit of an economic consensus now that the administration under President Obama didn’t quite invest enough [in big public works projects], that there should have been a much more vigorous fiscal response to the financial crisis. And in China, they did not really have anything like this underinvestment response. They had this enormous infrastructure building spree. They built about 20 Japans’ worth of high-speed track in the aftermath of 2008. They built about 140 million housing units.” —Dan Wang of Gavekal Dragonomics and Yale Law School, on the divergence between the United States and China after the Great Recession [[The Ringer](]   AROUND THE WEB - The National Transportation Safety Board is recommending all cars be manufactured to prevent speeding. It may be a tough sell, but the potential benefits are enormous: An estimated 12,000 people die annually in speed-related car accidents, and hundreds of thousands more are injured. [[NBC News](] - More than 40 Indian construction workers were rescued from a collapsed tunnel. A landslide had trapped the men 17 days ago. They were evacuated one by one through a three-foot pipe and miraculously none of them appeared to be injured. [[Times of London](] - Who are the Palestinians being released in Gaza hostage exchanges? The Israeli government labels many of them terrorists. Some of the prisoners have been convicted of crimes, which range from attempted murder to “throwing stones” or carrying a knife, but others have been held without being charged with a crime at all. [[Washington Post](]    [Learn more about RevenueStripe...](   MORE READS FROM VOX [The new Trump judge revolt against the Voting Rights Act, explained]( [The Israel-Hamas prisoner deal was extended. What comes next?]( [The militarized AI risk that’s bigger than “killer robots”]( [Why Diet Coke got so expensive]( [Today’s crossword](   ONE LAST THING Enjoying the Sentences newsletter? Forward it to a friend; they can [sign up for it right here](. As always, we want to know what you think. We recently changed the format of this newsletter. Any questions, comments, or ideas? Write us at newsletter@vox.com or just reply to this email.    [Learn more about RevenueStripe...](   [Facebook]( [Twitter]( [YouTube]( This email was sent to {EMAIL}. Manage your [email preferences]( [unsubscribe](param=sentences). If you value Vox’s unique explanatory journalism, support our work with a one-time or recurring [contribution](. View our [Privacy Notice]( and our [Terms of Service](. Vox Media, 1201 Connecticut Ave. NW, Floor 12, Washington, DC 20036. Copyright © 2023. All rights reserved.

Marketing emails from vox.com

View More
Sent On

01/06/2024

Sent On

01/06/2024

Sent On

31/05/2024

Sent On

31/05/2024

Sent On

30/05/2024

Sent On

29/05/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.