Newsletter Subject

All hail the head of AI

From

vox.com

Email Address

newsletter@vox.com

Sent On

Wed, Jul 19, 2023 10:00 AM

Email Preheader Text

America’s biggest companies are hiring AI leadership as fast as they can. No one knows what a h

America’s biggest companies are hiring AI leadership as fast as they can. No one knows what a head of AI does, but it’s the hottest new job If AI is coming for our jobs, many Americans are hoping to get out in front of it. Regular people are [using AI at work](, and tech workers are [rebranding themselves as AI experts](. And those in leadership are vying for the hottest new job title: head of AI. Outside of tech, the head of AI position was mostly nonexistent a few years ago, but now people are taking on that title — or at least its duties — at everywhere from Amazon to Visa to Coca-Cola. In the US, the number of people in AI leadership roles has grown threefold in the past five years, according to data from LinkedIn, bucking the downward trend in tech hiring overall. And while the head of AI job description varies widely by company, the hope is that those who end up with this new responsibility will do everything from incorporating AI into businesses’ products to getting employees up to speed on how to use AI in their jobs. Companies want the new role to keep them at the forefront of their industries amid AI disruption, or at least keep them from being left behind. “This is the biggest deal of the decade, and it’s ridiculously overhyped,” said Peter Krensky, a director and analyst at Gartner who specializes in AI talent management. Like anything new in tech, the AI revolution can take on a bit of a gold-rush quality. AI is one of the few areas where companies are actively spending money, since they see it as the inevitable future and as a way to improve their bottom line. At the same time, the parameters of the head of AI job — and even AI itself — aren’t very clear, and the pivot to the position can seem opportunistic. Remember [Shingy, AOL’s Digital Prophet](? The thing is that while everyone seems to agree that companies need AI stewards, the nature of new technology means many are uncertain as to what that stewardship means in practice. Furthermore, we’re not sure about who exactly should become the new stewards: the people who have been working on AI for years or those who have been introduced to AI by the latest crop of consumer products and understand how the rest of us use it. We’re also not certain just how big of a disruption AI will be and how fast that disruption will happen. Those are just some of the reasons companies are hiring heads of AI. And if they don’t already have a head of AI, most big companies will have one soon. “If I were talking to a CEO a year ago, and I was like, ‘You’d be a fool not to have a head of AI.’ They’d be like, ‘Come on, give me a break,’” said Krensky. “And now they’re like, ‘I know, that’s why I have one.’” Krensky estimates that currently about a quarter of Fortune 2000 companies have dedicated AI leadership at the VP level or above. He expects it to be about 80 percent a year from now. While the position will be more commonplace at bigger companies — especially those in banking, tech, and manufacturing — he’s also seeing it crop up at midsize organizations and in government agencies. Typically, the person taking what Kensky calls a “cool and sexy” job title — one that he says is often a “hat, not a role” — comes from an existing technology leadership position like chief data officer or chief information officer. But the accessible nature of generative AI tools and their potential use across industries and positions has meant that people in nontech roles like business and marketing are also donning the mantle. And because AI is supposed to be more transformational and more readily profitable than [tech fads like Web3](, experts think the head of AI is also going to stick. “This is going to be a role that will stay on for a while. It’s not a transitional role,” said Beena Ammanath, executive director of the Deloitte AI Institute. “It’s absolutely crucial.” Just what any given head of AI does varies, especially depending on the type of company. Generally, that breaks down into heads of AI at digital companies working to incorporate the technology into their products, while at nontech companies that means figuring out where and how to use existing AI technology to improve their business models. Everyone, it seems, is trying to get the rest of their company to start using AI. Mike Haley, SVP of research at Autodesk, says he’s the company’s de facto head of AI, having guided the architecture and engineering software company’s AI strategy for more than a decade. In addition to steering AI usage within the company, Haley is invested in putting AI to use in Autodesk’s products in order to “dissolve the interface” between users and the software. That means AI could help people use “natural methods of expression” like English or a pencil drawing, for example, to create detailed blueprints. “Suddenly this complex tool that requires all sorts of learning and parameterization becomes way more accessible to more people,” explained Haley, who has a background in computer science and applied math. Bali D.R., head of AI and automation at IT services consulting firm Infosys, is helping clients leverage AI while also trying to use it to “amplify human potential” across Infosys, from recruitment to sales to software development. “All parts of the value chain, we are seeing how we can actually make it better, faster, cheaper,” says D.R., who moved to the AI role from another management role, and who started his career at the company 30 years ago in software development. FICO chief analytics officer Scott Zoldi has been leading the data analytics company’s AI efforts for the past seven years, also without the “buzzy” head of AI title. He’s mainly focused on incorporating AI into the company’s products, including using consumer spending patterns to help detect credit fraud or when a customer is falling for a scam. He also spends a lot of time thinking about how AI can be used responsibly so as not to run afoul of regulatory bodies, corporate governance, or consumers by, for example, using AI that’s more likely to flag a certain group of people for committing fraud. Zoldi, who says he’s written more than 100 AI patents, thinks the “head of AI” position should go to someone with a technology background. “You really have to be an expert or you’re potentially going to be setting up the organization for failures down the road because it’s very complicated,” Zoldi, who views the position as a sort of watchdog, like a chief of security. While Gartner’s Krensky estimates about 80 percent of AI leadership comes from a tech background, another 20 percent, of course, does not. That’s the case with Coca-Cola’s global head of generative AI, Pratik Thakar, who previously led the company’s global creative strategy. Pratik has been using AI to streamline and amplify the company’s [advertising]( products. That included recently using AI to make roughly 15 percent of a [commercial](, which sliced the production time from a year down to two months. Conor Grennan, a dean at NYU’s Stern business school, who recently took on the additional title of head of generative AI, sees the title as more of an initiative and thinks of it as akin to a chief learning officer or chief productivity officer. In the position, he pushes people across NYU, from students to professors to administrators and recruiters, to use AI to become more efficient and better at their tasks. Grennan, who has an MBA and had previously studied English and politics, thinks it’s actually better for many organizations if their AI leadership doesn’t come from a tech background so that the person is better able to explain its benefits to a wider audience of mere mortals. “You don’t need to know the software running your iPhone, just order an Uber,” Grennan said. Instead, what’s important for the role, he says, is creativity with language and breadth. “They need to be an excellent communicator, they need to have a view of the entire firm, at least at the 30,000-foot view. And also it has to be somebody who really understands what generative AI can do,” Grennan said. “You don’t capture everything by putting it in the tech department.” Regardless of where the head of AI sits within an organization, the fact remains that it’s a new frontier that will likely change a lot as the technology and our understanding of it develops. And like with any new technology, there’s going to be a mix of genuine innovation and genuine swindling. AI is happening, and it will be a very big deal. But its full effects — and exactly what those are — will roll out over many years, so we may have time to figure things out. —Rani Molla, senior correspondent   [A baby sleeping in front of a baby monitor.]( Getty Images/iStockphoto [There’s a handy new label to tell you if your gadget is easy to hack or notÂ]( [Is your baby monitor secure? The Biden administration now has a logo for that.](   [A black-and-white photo shows a row of young women in 1940s fashion working at a telephone switchboard.]( Bell Telephone Company of Pennsylvania/Federal Communications Commission/PhotoQuest/Getty Images [Telephone operation was a good career for women. Then it got automated.]( [How automation wiped out a whole career for young women — and how young women adapted.](   [G/O Media CEO Jim Spanfeller at a 2022 conference.]( Piaras Ó Mídheach/Sportsfile for Collision via Getty Images [You’re going to see more AI-written articles whether you like it or not]( [Why G/O Media thinks we should have more stories written by bots.](    [Learn more about RevenueStripe...](   [A sign for Activision outside its California headquarters.]( Eric Thayer/Bloomberg via Getty Images [The FTC’s case against Microsoft’s Activision acquisition is not going well]( [Sony signed a 10-year deal to keep Call of Duty on PlayStation, signaling that it believes Microsoft will soon acquire the game franchise.](   [A robot shuffles cards with paperclip illustrations on them]( Ariel Davis for Vox [The $1 billion gamble to ensure AI doesn’t destroy humanity]( [The founders of Anthropic quit OpenAI to make a safe AI company. It’s easier said than done.](   Support our work Vox Technology is free for all, thanks in part to financial support from our readers. Will you join them by making a gift today? [Give](   [Listen To This]( [Listen to This]( Can Meta make a Twitter killer? We’re one week into the Threads era. How long is that going to last? What does it mean for Twitter, really? And what do Threads and continued chaos at Twitter say about the future of social media? [Listen to Apple Podcasts](   [This is cool]( [A typology of unwanted Manhattan office buildings](  [Learn more about RevenueStripe...](   [Facebook]( [Twitter]( [YouTube]( This email was sent to {EMAIL}. Manage your [email preferences]( , or [unsubscribe](param=tech)  to stop receiving emails from Vox Media. View our [Privacy Notice]( and our [Terms of Service](. Vox Media, 1201 Connecticut Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20036. Copyright © 2023. All rights reserved.

EDM Keywords (218)

years year written working work women way vying vox visa views view users use us understanding understand uncertain typology type trying transformational title time threads thinks thing thanks terms tell technology tech talking taking take sure supposed students streamline stick stay started speed specializes sorts sort someone somebody software sliced sign setting sent seems seeing see security scam says sales row roll role road revenuestripe rest research requires recruitment recruiters rebranding really readers quarter putting professors products positions position pivot person people parts part parameters organization order one often nyu number need nature moved mix microsoft meant mean mba may marketing manufacturing mantle manage making make lot long logo listen likely like least learning leading leadership last language know keep join iphone invested introduced interface initiative incorporate improve important hoping hope heads head hat happening happen hail hack guided going go give get gartner gadget future ftc front free founders forefront fool flag fast falling failures explain expert expects example exactly everywhere everything end email efficient easy duty duties dissolve disruption director develops decade dean data customer currently crop creativity course cool consumers company companies commonplace commercial coming come clear chief certain ceo case career breaks breadth black bit big better benefits become background automation autodesk areas architecture analyst amplify amazon also already akin ai agree administrators addition accessible

Marketing emails from vox.com

View More
Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

05/12/2024

Sent On

03/12/2024

Sent On

29/11/2024

Sent On

27/11/2024

Sent On

27/11/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.