Newsletter Subject

Elizabeth Warren escalates things

From

vox.com

Email Address

newsletter@vox.com

Sent On

Wed, Jul 12, 2023 09:29 PM

Email Preheader Text

She's behind a new congressional report about an internet privacy violation that might actually have

She's behind a new congressional report about an internet privacy violation that might actually have consequences. Tax prep companies let Google and Facebook sell ads off your data Sen. Elizabeth Warren is coming for the tracking pixels. Specifically, she, along with fellow Democratic Sens. Ron Wyden, Richard Blumenthal, Tammy Duckworth, Bernie Sanders, and Sheldon Whitehouse, and Rep. Katie Porter, are coming for tax preparation companies that sent tens, if not hundreds, of millions of taxpayers’ data to Big Tech through those tracking pixels. On Wednesday, the lawmakers released [a report]( detailing how TaxAct, H&R Block, and TaxSlayer put Meta and Google's [tracking pixels]( on their sites, sharing taxpayers’ data with those companies in what could be a violation of the law. It shows how extensive this data collection and sharing is, even on web services that you’d expect or trust would keep your information private. The situation also shows how a lack of privacy laws has helped make this practice so widespread and ingrained into the fabric of the internet itself, to the point that even companies that may have a legal obligation to keep our data private don’t know or don’t care that they aren’t doing so. “Giant tax prep companies have recklessly shared millions of taxpayers’ most sensitive, private tax information with Meta in what appears to be a violation of the law,” Warren told Vox. “The Department of Justice and FTC must immediately investigate and prosecute any Big Tax Prep or Big Tech company that broke the law, and we must expand the IRS’ free, direct-file program to ensure taxpayers have the option to protect their privacy from greedy, reckless corporations.” The seven-month investigation was prompted by [a report]( from the Markup, which found Meta’s trackers on the three tax prep companies’ websites. Those trackers, the article said, were sending the sensitive financial and biographical information that the tax prep sites collect to Meta. That data could include names, addresses, phone numbers, which pages users clicked on, and even their income, refund amount, and other financial data. (Intuit, which makes TurboTax, also had trackers on its sites, but the data it shared was limited.) The three companies acknowledged to the Senate inquiry that they’ve used pixels from Meta, Google, and, in TaxSlayer’s case, several other companies, for years now. The amount and type of data they shared was even more extensive than what the Markup discovered. The tax prep companies along with Meta and Google, which were also consulted in the inquiry, maintained that this data was anonymized, but the inquiry found that it is possible to reidentify individuals from it. TaxSlayer didn’t respond to a request for comment. H&R Block said it “takes protecting our clients’ privacy very seriously, and we have taken steps to prevent the sharing of information via pixels.” The company told the inquiry that it had Meta pixels on its sites for “at least a couple of years” and denied using any other pixels, even though Google confirmed that H&R Block used the Google Analytics tracker. This discrepancy, the report said, “raises the concern that tax prep companies themselves are unaware of what pixels they are using and how this may be affecting taxpayer privacy.” TaxAct said it “has engaged with Senator Warren and her staff to provide transparent, detailed explanations on our use of these standard analytics tools.” The company added that it “has always complied with laws that protect our customers’ privacy and, as noted in the report, we disabled the tools in question while we evaluated potential concerns. Protecting the rights and privacy of our customers is our top priority.” Those companies aren’t the only ones tracking us. This kind of tracking happens all over the internet and on [our mobile devices](, and there’s very little we can do to stop it or know it’s even happening. Sites and apps do it to get analytics and for advertising, an arrangement that can be mutually beneficial to the companies that embed the trackers and the companies doing the tracking. Those trackers can be recklessly deployed, scooping up and sending off far more information than is actually needed. The Markup’s [investigative series]( into trackers has found several examples of this in addition to the tax prep report. When a company isn’t beholden to privacy laws, it may not want to or care to put the time and effort into monitoring what it’s sending off. But there are regulations about certain kinds of data in limited circumstances. Health data [is one](. Tax data [is another](. Oops! In their defense, the tax prep companies either said they knew about the trackers but didn’t think they violated any laws, or claimed that they didn’t know all of the data that those trackers were sharing. The new congressional report’s authors did not seem to find these excuses or justifications to be sufficient, excoriating the companies for their “complete lack of corporate responsibility and accountability” and asking the heads of the Internal Revenue Service, Federal Trade Commission, Department of Justice, and the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration to look into potential violations of the law in a [separate letter](. Meta told Vox that it has clear policies about what advertisers should send through their pixels and that the company has tools in place to filter out sensitive information it might receive. But Meta didn’t respond to questions from the tax prep companies or the inquiry itself about what those tools specifically filter nor what data the platform received from the sites. Google also said that it has policies against using its trackers to collect identifiable information and advertising to people based on sensitive information. But the companies that use the trackers are the ones responsible for selecting what information the trackers collect, Google said. There are a few things you can do to prevent or at least mitigate how much of your data is being shared through pixels. [Google]( and [Meta]( offer privacy choices that they say will stop tracking through pixels or advertising based on that data. There are [web browsers]( built for privacy that block trackers and [browser]( [extensions]( that should do the same. Just know that nothing is foolproof, and companies that rely on your data to power their massive advertising businesses are going to do everything possible to get it. Congressional inquiries like this may result in legal consequences for the companies that violate the few privacy laws we do have, but there is a large swath of companies that aren’t beholden to anything. Comprehensive privacy legislation could help here, both by creating consequences for companies that violate our privacy and giving us more rights over our data in the first place. That [doesn’t look likely]( to happen on a federal level, despite years of effort from some lawmakers, [including Sen. Wyden](, one of the report’s authors. But another solution, at least in these limited circumstances, is that taxpayers don’t have to e-file their taxes through these companies and their sites in the first place. The tax prep industry has lobbied [for years]( to make filing for taxes a complicated process and to be the only place consumers can go to file taxes online. They even had an agreement with the IRS to offer “[free](” filing services as long as the government didn’t create its own system to compete with them. As a result, the report notes, 200 million Americans filed their taxes electronically last year, and a lot of them used one of the major tax prep services to do it. That might change. The government is now developing a way to [e-file taxes to the IRS directly](. Warren has championed this cause, including in a bill she introduced last year, [the Tax Filing Simplification Act](. Assuming the IRS isn’t throwing a bunch of tracking pixels on its own website, that could go a long way to stop taxpayer data from being shared with Meta and Google — and make it easier and cheaper to file taxes in the first place. —Sara Morrison, senior reporter   [A pile of Amazon boxes wrapped in plastic wrap..]( Victor J. Blue/Bloomberg via Getty Images [We all just fell for Amazon’s made-up holiday yet again]( [Get something you didn’t need on Prime Day? You’re not alone.](   [A woman in gray suit and a man in a jersey sit courtside at a basketball game.]( Juan Ocampo/NBAE via Getty Images [Twitter is dying. Policing women’s bodies is keeping it alive.]( [What Keke Palmer, Tracee Ellis Ross, and Jonah Hill tell us about how we talk about gender online.](   [A sign for Activision outside its California headquarters.]( Eric Thayer/Bloomberg via Getty Images [The FTC’s case against Microsoft’s Activision acquisition is not going well]( [A judge has denied the agency’s request for a preliminary injunction to stop the merger.](    [Learn more about RevenueStripe...](   [UPS workers gather around a large inflatable pig holding a bag of money, preparing picket lines with a variety of signs supporting the Teamsters.]( Timothy A Clary/AFP via Getty Images [340,000 UPS workers could go on strike July 31. Here’s what it means.]( [Our reliance on delivery gives the Teamsters union a lot more leverage in UPS negotiations.](   [In this photo illustration, the Threads logo is displayed on a smartphone screen with the image of Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg in the background. ]( Rafael Henrique/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images [Meta is finally having its moment with the Twitter alternative Threads]( [With 100 million users, Mark Zuckerberg is already winning his fight against Elon Musk — at least in the cage match that is social media.](   Support our work Vox Technology is free for all, thanks in part to financial support from our readers. Will you join them by making a gift today? [Give](   [Listen To This] [Listen to This]( [Even AI’s creators don’t understand it]( AI has the potential to impact our society in dramatic ways, but researchers can’t explain precisely how it works or how it might evolve. Will they ever understand it? This is the first episode of our new two-part series, The Black Box. [Listen to Apple Podcasts](   [This is cool]( [Shark attacks are good, actually?](  [Learn more about RevenueStripe...](   [Facebook]( [Twitter]( [YouTube]( This email was sent to {EMAIL}. Manage your [email preferences]( , or [unsubscribe](param=tech)  to stop receiving emails from Vox Media. View our [Privacy Notice]( and our [Terms of Service](. Vox Media, 1201 Connecticut Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20036. Copyright © 2023. All rights reserved.

Marketing emails from vox.com

View More
Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

05/12/2024

Sent On

03/12/2024

Sent On

29/11/2024

Sent On

27/11/2024

Sent On

27/11/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.