She's behind a new congressional report about an internet privacy violation that might actually have consequences.
Tax prep companies let Google and Facebook sell ads off your data Sen. Elizabeth Warren is coming for the tracking pixels. Specifically, she, along with fellow Democratic Sens. Ron Wyden, Richard Blumenthal, Tammy Duckworth, Bernie Sanders, and Sheldon Whitehouse, and Rep. Katie Porter, are coming for tax preparation companies that sent tens, if not hundreds, of millions of taxpayersâ data to Big Tech through those tracking pixels. On Wednesday, the lawmakers released [a report]( detailing how TaxAct, H&R Block, and TaxSlayer put Meta and Google's [tracking pixels]( on their sites, sharing taxpayersâ data with those companies in what could be a violation of the law. It shows how extensive this data collection and sharing is, even on web services that youâd expect or trust would keep your information private. The situation also shows how a lack of privacy laws has helped make this practice so widespread and ingrained into the fabric of the internet itself, to the point that even companies that may have a legal obligation to keep our data private donât know or donât care that they arenât doing so. âGiant tax prep companies have recklessly shared millions of taxpayersâ most sensitive, private tax information with Meta in what appears to be a violation of the law,â Warren told Vox. âThe Department of Justice and FTC must immediately investigate and prosecute any Big Tax Prep or Big Tech company that broke the law, and we must expand the IRSâ free, direct-file program to ensure taxpayers have the option to protect their privacy from greedy, reckless corporations.â The seven-month investigation was prompted by [a report]( from the Markup, which found Metaâs trackers on the three tax prep companiesâ websites. Those trackers, the article said, were sending the sensitive financial and biographical information that the tax prep sites collect to Meta. That data could include names, addresses, phone numbers, which pages users clicked on, and even their income, refund amount, and other financial data. (Intuit, which makes TurboTax, also had trackers on its sites, but the data it shared was limited.) The three companies acknowledged to the Senate inquiry that theyâve used pixels from Meta, Google, and, in TaxSlayerâs case, several other companies, for years now. The amount and type of data they shared was even more extensive than what the Markup discovered. The tax prep companies along with Meta and Google, which were also consulted in the inquiry, maintained that this data was anonymized, but the inquiry found that it is possible to reidentify individuals from it. TaxSlayer didnât respond to a request for comment. H&R Block said it âtakes protecting our clientsâ privacy very seriously, and we have taken steps to prevent the sharing of information via pixels.â The company told the inquiry that it had Meta pixels on its sites for âat least a couple of yearsâ and denied using any other pixels, even though Google confirmed that H&R Block used the Google Analytics tracker. This discrepancy, the report said, âraises the concern that tax prep companies themselves are unaware of what pixels they are using and how this may be affecting taxpayer privacy.â TaxAct said it âhas engaged with Senator Warren and her staff to provide transparent, detailed explanations on our use of these standard analytics tools.â The company added that it âhas always complied with laws that protect our customersâ privacy and, as noted in the report, we disabled the tools in question while we evaluated potential concerns. Protecting the rights and privacy of our customers is our top priority.â Those companies arenât the only ones tracking us. This kind of tracking happens all over the internet and on [our mobile devices](, and thereâs very little we can do to stop it or know itâs even happening. Sites and apps do it to get analytics and for advertising, an arrangement that can be mutually beneficial to the companies that embed the trackers and the companies doing the tracking. Those trackers can be recklessly deployed, scooping up and sending off far more information than is actually needed. The Markupâs [investigative series]( into trackers has found several examples of this in addition to the tax prep report. When a company isnât beholden to privacy laws, it may not want to or care to put the time and effort into monitoring what itâs sending off. But there are regulations about certain kinds of data in limited circumstances. Health data [is one](. Tax data [is another](. Oops! In their defense, the tax prep companies either said they knew about the trackers but didnât think they violated any laws, or claimed that they didnât know all of the data that those trackers were sharing. The new congressional reportâs authors did not seem to find these excuses or justifications to be sufficient, excoriating the companies for their âcomplete lack of corporate responsibility and accountabilityâ and asking the heads of the Internal Revenue Service, Federal Trade Commission, Department of Justice, and the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration to look into potential violations of the law in a [separate letter](. Meta told Vox that it has clear policies about what advertisers should send through their pixels and that the company has tools in place to filter out sensitive information it might receive. But Meta didnât respond to questions from the tax prep companies or the inquiry itself about what those tools specifically filter nor what data the platform received from the sites. Google also said that it has policies against using its trackers to collect identifiable information and advertising to people based on sensitive information. But the companies that use the trackers are the ones responsible for selecting what information the trackers collect, Google said. There are a few things you can do to prevent or at least mitigate how much of your data is being shared through pixels. [Google]( and [Meta]( offer privacy choices that they say will stop tracking through pixels or advertising based on that data. There are [web browsers]( built for privacy that block trackers and [browser]( [extensions]( that should do the same. Just know that nothing is foolproof, and companies that rely on your data to power their massive advertising businesses are going to do everything possible to get it. Congressional inquiries like this may result in legal consequences for the companies that violate the few privacy laws we do have, but there is a large swath of companies that arenât beholden to anything. Comprehensive privacy legislation could help here, both by creating consequences for companies that violate our privacy and giving us more rights over our data in the first place. That [doesnât look likely]( to happen on a federal level, despite years of effort from some lawmakers, [including Sen. Wyden](, one of the reportâs authors. But another solution, at least in these limited circumstances, is that taxpayers donât have to e-file their taxes through these companies and their sites in the first place. The tax prep industry has lobbied [for years]( to make filing for taxes a complicated process and to be the only place consumers can go to file taxes online. They even had an agreement with the IRS to offer â[free](â filing services as long as the government didnât create its own system to compete with them. As a result, the report notes, 200 million Americans filed their taxes electronically last year, and a lot of them used one of the major tax prep services to do it. That might change. The government is now developing a way to [e-file taxes to the IRS directly](. Warren has championed this cause, including in a bill she introduced last year, [the Tax Filing Simplification Act](. Assuming the IRS isnât throwing a bunch of tracking pixels on its own website, that could go a long way to stop taxpayer data from being shared with Meta and Google â and make it easier and cheaper to file taxes in the first place. âSara Morrison, senior reporter [A pile of Amazon boxes wrapped in plastic wrap..]( Victor J. Blue/Bloomberg via Getty Images [We all just fell for Amazonâs made-up holiday yet again]( [Get something you didnât need on Prime Day? Youâre not alone.]( [A woman in gray suit and a man in a jersey sit courtside at a basketball game.]( Juan Ocampo/NBAE via Getty Images [Twitter is dying. Policing womenâs bodies is keeping it alive.]( [What Keke Palmer, Tracee Ellis Ross, and Jonah Hill tell us about how we talk about gender online.]( [A sign for Activision outside its California headquarters.]( Eric Thayer/Bloomberg via Getty Images [The FTCâs case against Microsoftâs Activision acquisition is not going well]( [A judge has denied the agencyâs request for a preliminary injunction to stop the merger.](
Â
[Learn more about RevenueStripe...]( [UPS workers gather around a large inflatable pig holding a bag of money, preparing picket lines with a variety of signs supporting the Teamsters.]( Timothy A Clary/AFP via Getty Images [340,000 UPS workers could go on strike July 31. Hereâs what it means.]( [Our reliance on delivery gives the Teamsters union a lot more leverage in UPS negotiations.]( [In this photo illustration, the Threads logo is displayed on a smartphone screen with the image of Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg in the background. ]( Rafael Henrique/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images [Meta is finally having its moment with the Twitter alternative Threads]( [With 100 million users, Mark Zuckerberg is already winning his fight against Elon Musk â at least in the cage match that is social media.]( Support our work Vox Technology is free for all, thanks in part to financial support from our readers. Will you join them by making a gift today? [Give]( [Listen To This] [Listen to This]( [Even AIâs creators donât understand it]( AI has the potential to impact our society in dramatic ways, but researchers canât explain precisely how it works or how it might evolve. Will they ever understand it? This is the first episode of our new two-part series, The Black Box. [Listen to Apple Podcasts]( [This is cool]( [Shark attacks are good, actually?](
Â
[Learn more about RevenueStripe...]( [Facebook]( [Twitter]( [YouTube]( This email was sent to {EMAIL}. Manage yourâ¯[email preferences]( , orâ¯[unsubscribe](param=tech) â¯to stop receiving emails from Vox Media. View our [Privacy Notice]( and our [Terms of Service](. Vox Media, 1201 Connecticut Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20036. Copyright © 2023. All rights reserved.