Newsletter Subject

You go viral. How do you get rich?

From

vox.com

Email Address

newsletter@vox.com

Sent On

Tue, Jan 25, 2022 01:00 PM

Email Preheader Text

Inside the fledgling cottage industry helping influencers make money. The Tuesday edition of the Goo

Inside the fledgling cottage industry helping influencers make money. The Tuesday edition of the Goods newsletter is all about internet culture, brought to you by senior reporter Rebecca Jennings. 💸 Why influencers never want to talk about money 💰 Monique Black, a 27-year-old fashion influencer from Detroit, likely wouldn’t have a clue how much to charge brands if it weren’t for Twitter. She’d [gone viral several times]( on Instagram and Reels for her fun, trendy, plus-size outfit styling videos and wanted to figure out how to turn her 100,000 TikTok followers into a career while the pandemic stalled her work as an esthetician. She stumbled upon a [career mentorship program for women of color](, and was later matched with a British talent manager who taught her the unofficial guide to Influencing 101. For a skyrocketing industry, there are very few places where aspiring content creators can speak publicly about the finer details of their work. It’s a delicate balance, performing your life for the consumption of others, then calculating your value in the public marketplace of attention. While most influencers have multiple streams of revenue — sharing affiliate links, making money from creator funds, launching their own businesses, or starting a subscription service — by far the most popular is brand sponsorships, in which a company pays an influencer to promote or incorporate its product. When they first start out, fledgling influencers typically have no frame of reference for how much they should be paid for such services: a 30-second TikTok video, an Instagram story, a series of three posts in two months, whatever it might be. And in an industry predicated on aspiration and envy, things can get messy: If Nike sends you free sneakers, do you still post the shoes in the hope that the company might pay you in the future? What do you do if you find out another influencer is being paid significantly more for the same work? If a brand takes six months to pay you but you’ve signed an NDA, where do you go? In recent years, a cottage industry has formed around the problem of calculating the worth of influencers, who have been estimated to number [more than 50 million]( globally. Some have come in the form of call-out Instagram accounts that function as whisper networks for creators, such as the now-dormant [@influencerpaygap]( and [@brands_behaving_badly](. Dozens of “creator marketplaces” have arisen in attempts to connect influencers with brands that might hire them, with names like Upfluence or CreatorIQ. Even [influencer unions]( have sprung up: the American Influencer Council in the US and The Creator’s Union in the UK, while SAG-AFTRA [now allows creators to join](. As of the past year, two platforms are competing to become the “Glassdoor for influencers”: [F*** You Pay Me](, founded by a content creator and a Facebook data scientist, and now [Clara](, founded by Christen Nino de Guzman, who has previously worked in creator partnerships at Instagram, Pinterest, and most recently TikTok. Nino de Guzman, 31, launched Clara on January 14 as a Glassdoor-meets-LinkedIn service where creators can share how much they were paid by certain brands, whether those payments were on time, and what the experience of working with them was like. Reviews are anonymous, but influencers can also build public profiles that act as media kits to show to brands. “There’s this new class of creators who have been propelled to stardom overnight, and they’re the ones who tend to suffer the most because they're not knowledgeable of the industry at all,” explains Nino de Guzman. There are now more people calling themselves content creators than ever, partly due to the pandemic and the subsequent [“great resignation”]( of disillusioned employees, and partly because of the rise of apps like TikTok where an otherwise normal person can see an [explosion of followers extremely quickly](. They’re the ones who you’ll often see promoting junk products ([ocean galaxy lights, questionable teeth-whitening solutions]() from shady-seeming brands that offer them a few hundred bucks to shill to their audiences, or selling an NFT of their viral post in an attempt to cash out fast. “Everybody is basically their own contract employees and setting their own rates. I had no idea what to price anything,” says [Ashley Hosmer](, a 34-year-old lifestyle creator in Los Angeles. After losing her job early in the pandemic, she began posting reviews of scented candles on Instagram and got so many eager replies that she leaned into it further. She’s now known on TikTok as the creator with the most [detailed candle review spreadsheet in history](. Hosmer learned about the financial side of being an influencer by discussing with fellow creators who had similar-sized followings of around 20,000 on Instagram and [30,000 on TikTok](. “That’s the whole point of social media: finding your community,” she says. Still, like nearly every influencer I’ve spoken with over the years, she doesn’t discuss her rates publicly. “So much can change. Once you put your rate up, it could deter brands from connecting with you if they think it's too high. Or you might get all these people messaging you saying it should have been more.” There tend to be two responses influencers fear that prevent them from discussing how much money they make. “People don’t want to share because then their followers are going to be like, ‘I’m not going to support you because how do you make that much money for what you do?” says Black. “Most people still have zero respect for how much work goes into it.” The other fear is its inverse: That they’ll be publicly embarrassed about charging brands too little. It’s the judgment from followers that hits Hosmer the hardest. She’s a natural sharer, and says she’d be posting about her life on Instagram whether or not she was making money from it, but sometimes it can come at a cost. One follower, for instance, criticized her for buying a “boring brown table” after she’d expressed interest in saving money. On the flip side, there are common assumptions about people with large Instagram followings that don’t always hold up. “People have this image of influencers, whether they have 10,000 or 100,000 followers, that they're making so much money. But it's not like that for a lot of people, so I try to demystify it.” Hosmer is primarily a lifestyle influencer: She shares photos of her colorful, tasteful Los Angeles home, her collection of floral maxi dresses, her husband, and their dog. Part of the appeal of following her is to lust over interior decor and pretty photos, to imagine that her life is nothing but charmed and cozy. The question of how much she gets paid for this is a fraught one: These questions don’t take into account the circumstances of her life, like the fact that she has a husband with a well-paying job with good health insurance. And sharing the details of her bank account, thereby opening her life up further to the judgment of others, could paradoxically make it less valuable. “You have to build yourself up before you can ruin the mystique as an influencer,” explains Black. “You have to get people to be like, ‘I want to be you,’ and then you can be like, ‘Well, yeah, my dad pays for my apartment.’ You have to reel them in before you can be honest, which is unfortunate.” The pay gap between the highest echelon of influencers who have become household names and the vast majority of people monetizing their content reflects similar gaps in the wider economy, and shares similar prejudices. Black has watched many brands, in an effort to make themselves appear to support greater diversity, send free products to creators of color and plus-size creators, but pay white, straight-sized creators actual money to feature the same products. “My skinny friends will post on their private Story saying that such-and-such brand paid them $3,000 for their last post, and then that company will reach out to me and tell me they don’t have a budget, they just want to give me products,” she says. “I’ve literally had luxury brands tell me they don’t have a budget and I’m like, you literally sell $1,000 purses.” Lissette Calveiro is the founder of Influence with Impact, an influencer coaching and consulting firm that, among other things, helps creators determine their rates for certain brand work. There are four key elements to the formula, Calveiro explains, the first being the deliverables, or the actual content a brand wants you to make. “There’s a standard that you should charge 1 to 5 percent of your follower size [per post], and that’s a good place to start,” she says. Second is the terms of use, or how and for how long the company can use your work, and third is exclusivity, or whether the influencer is not allowed to work with any of the brand’s competitors for a certain length of time (if so, charge extra). Lastly is the timeline, or how long or how much effort it will take to produce the content, which also includes the costs of production. Creators are discouraged from speaking about those rates, however, often via nondisclosure agreements that explicitly prevent them from doing so. But the framing of “evil corporations versus poor disenfranchised influencers” doesn’t quite tell the whole story. “It's not necessarily like the brands have malicious intent,” says Nino de Guzman. “It's that neither side really understands how to price this work because the rates are so all over the place. They're given a budget and ask creators, ‘What do you want to be paid?’” Within 72 hours of launching Clara, Nino de Guzman says thousands of creators signed up, many of them Black and Latinx and hungry for information on what to charge. Demystifying influencer finance has proved a lucrative business. Calveiro launched Influence with Impact in December 2018 after spending her career leading creator marketing efforts at ad agencies like Havas and Ogilvy. In 2019, the company pulled in around $60,000; in 2021, Calveiro says it made $450,000. Startups that aim to educate creators and brands seem only likely to grow. Influencing is still a dream job for many people, but it isn’t something you can apply for. [Babies]( can be influencers. So can [dogs](. Nobody tells you how to do it; you don’t have a boss. Influencers are, ultimately, digital islands competing for our attention, many of them without guidance from someone who might know better. That’s what Monique Black wants brands to understand. “These are young girls who may not have financial literacy and may not know their worth,” she says. “And if you're a 28-year-old social media manager and you know you can offer them that extra $300? Just do it. Because it literally doesn't hurt you.”  [Learn more about RevenueStripe...]( Clickbait 👀 - Instagram is [testing a paid subscription feature]( for creators. - A [day in the life]( of one of India’s biggest influencer families. - Instagram’s other [kind of gun nuts](. - I really thought we were past the era of [overeager VCs]( throwing billions of dollars at flimsy startup ideas. - OnlyFans creators say they’ve [been scammed by shady managers](. - No, prayer apps will not protect you from [data mining](. - This story [about the metaverse real estate]( rush includes the quote, “The fact that this is the next evolution of the internet is 100 percent guaranteed.” Okay! - Here’s a [juicy longform]( about a feud between the Tinder co-founders. One Last Thing 👋 Are you impressed that I went through this whole newsletter without mentioning [West Elm Caleb](?  [Learn more about RevenueStripe...]( Manage your [email preferences]( or [unsubscribe](param=goods). If you value Vox’s unique explanatory journalism, support our work with a one-time or recurring [contribution](. View our [Privacy Policy]( and our [Terms of Service](. Vox Media, 1201 Connecticut Ave. NW, Floor 11, Washington, DC 20036. Copyright © 2022. All rights reserved.

EDM Keywords (237)

years worth working work women whether went wanted want value use us union unfortunate understand uk twitter turn try timeline time tiktok third think testing terms tend tell taught talk take support suffer story still starting start standard sprung spoken spending speaking sometimes something someone signed show shoes shill sharing share setting services series selling see scammed says saying ruin rise reference reels reel reach rates rate quote questions question put proved protect propelled promote products product produce problem primarily price prevent posting post popular places place people payments pay past partly pandemic paid others ones one ogilvy offer number nothing nft nda mystique much might may many making make lust lot losing long little literally likely like life learn leaned latinx known knowledgeable know kind judgment join inverse internet instagram information influencers influencer influence industry india incorporate impressed impact imagine image idea husband hurt hungry hosmer hope honest high hardest got going go glassdoor given give future function framing frame founder founded form following followers first find figure feud feature fear far fact explosion experience exclusivity estimated esthetician era effort dollars discussing discuss discouraged details demystify deliverables day creators creator cozy costs content consumption connecting competitors competing company community come color collection clue circumstances charmed change cash career call calculating buying businesses build budget brands brand black become basically babies audiences attention attempts attempt aspiration arisen apply appear appeal apartment anonymous among allowed aim act account 2019

Marketing emails from vox.com

View More
Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

05/12/2024

Sent On

03/12/2024

Sent On

29/11/2024

Sent On

27/11/2024

Sent On

27/11/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.