Newsletter Subject

The most popular TikTok of the year

From

vox.com

Email Address

newsletter@vox.com

Sent On

Tue, Dec 8, 2020 01:02 PM

Email Preheader Text

Hello from The Goods' resident internet culture reporter, ! On Tuesdays, I'm using this space to upd

Hello from The Goods' resident internet culture reporter, [Rebecca Jennings](! On Tuesdays, I'm using this space to update you all on what's been going on in the world of TikTok. Is there something you want to see more of? Less of? Different of? Email me at rebecca.jennings@vox.com. It’s December, which is always a time to reflect on the past 12 months, although the major difference this year is that nine of them were collectively terrible. Well, terrible with one exception: Over the past few weeks, writers have begun publishing their odes to 2020, the year of TikTok. By April, it had [already surpassed 2 billion]( downloads; it now has an estimated [850 million monthly active users](. BuzzFeed’s Scaachi Koul [wrote that]( TikTok was “2020’s only silver lining”; Bookforum’s Charlotte Shane [described it]( as “a precious source of solace during an unendingly precarious time.” Vulture’s Zoe Haylock [argued that](it was “the best medium for our absurdist present.” For what it’s worth, I agree. Or, at least I did, until I saw [TikTok’s top 100 trends of 2020](, which ranks the most popular people, memes, and subcultures on the platform (whether or not these were heavily curated is unclear — TikTok did not provide data to back up its claims regarding what makes a “top” trend). What you’ll find there is both heartening and not. In the music section, Black artists make up nine of the 10 hits, although one of them was Jason Derulo’s rather shameless remake of an already-viral reggaeton beat, which he released without permission from the [little-known New Zealand artist Jawsh 685](. Emerging creators like vegan cooking influencer [Tabitha Brown]( and Minnesota-based [Doctor Leslie]( were highlighted in the list, but the vast majority of creators named had mostly gone viral for being traditionally good-looking or otherwise interesting to look at. The most popular video of the year, for instance, was of a woman named Bella Poarch with an exceptionally childlike face making cosplay expressions to a grime song. It has been viewed [more than half a billion times](. What does Bella Poarch’s inexplicable rise say about the future of entertainment? I think this [recent Kyle Chayka piece]( that basically tries to answer the question “How do you describe TikTok?” makes a lot of really salient points. He’s [written extensively]( on algorithms and their effects on the culture, and on TikTok, the algorithm is the entirety of the experience. On the For You page, users don’t curate their feeds like they would on Twitter or Instagram; the decision of what to watch is made for them, and none of us are allowed to know why the videos we see are the ones served to us. Chayka compares TikTok to two forms of legacy media: magazines and television, with the user acting as both editor and consumer. “‘The mix’ is famously how Tina Brown described the combination of different kinds of stories in Vanity Fair when she was the magazine’s very successful editor-in-chief in the ‘80s,” he writes. “Brown’s mix was hard-hitting news, fluffy celebrity profiles, glamorous fashion shoots, and smart critical commentary, all combined into one magazine. TikTok automates the mix of all these topics, going farther than any other platform to mimic the human editor.” At the same time, he says, it’s also “an eternal channel flip, and the flip is the point: there is no settled point of interest to land on. Nothing is meant to sustain your attention.” The result, he argues, is what essentially amounts to “soft censorship,” or a feed that becomes as “glossy, appealing, and homogenous as possible rather than the truest reflection of either reality or a user’s desires.” How did a perfectly average competitive dancer become the No. 1 internet celebrity in the world? Why did half a billion people watch Poarch’s face bob up and down? Because these two women are the logical endpoint of the world’s most powerful entertainment algorithm: young people centering their conventional attractiveness in easily repeatable formats. With every new TikTok star who dances or smirks their way to a million followers come just as many more people asking why they deserve to be famous in the first place. The cycle of overnight fame and equally swift backlash is going to keep happening, because as more people download and use TikTok, the algorithm gets better at choosing the content we all must pay attention to. Those are problems we can save for next year, though. As Koul writes in BuzzFeed, “Look, I know TikTok is probably evil, as most tech companies turn out to be, but that’s later me’s problem. Current me just wants to be soothed.” Here’s to a year of avoiding the news and getting lost in the void. TikTok in the news 🗞️ - The TikTok sale was supposed to be done by now. [It appears no one cares.]( - Another TikTok talent management company, IQ Advantage, has been accused of using scammy practices to retain clients, including contracts that required them to give the company a deposit of $299 before signing (an extremely unusual deal), [Business Insider reports](. Thankfully, the company appears to have shut down in November. - A [smart and sort of scary read]( on whether TikTok is equipped to handle the responsibilities of a global platform, by Rest of World's Louise Matsakis. - Versailles — like, the palace — is [on TikTok now](. It’s only the latest historic institution to turn to the platform in an effort to reach its young users. - A cool look at how TikTok [blows up rap verses](before they’re even songs. - Miley Cyrus is [doing the most]( on TikTok (including [asking out a fan](, it’s very cute!). - Do not watch the videos from this [crime scene clean-up crew’s]( TikTok account if you are squeamish about blood. - This Starbucks taste test and its [follow-up videos]( are a WILD ride; friendly reminder that before you leave [angry reviews on scented candles](, make sure you don’t have Covid-19! One last thing 👋 Let’s face it, we’re all just jealous of the [“chamomile tea bitches.”]( Manage your [email preferences](, or [unsubscribe]( to stop receiving emails from Vox Media. View our [Privacy Policy]( and our [Terms of Service](. Vox Media, 1201 Connecticut Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20036. Copyright © 2020. All rights reserved.

Marketing emails from vox.com

View More
Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

05/12/2024

Sent On

03/12/2024

Sent On

29/11/2024

Sent On

27/11/2024

Sent On

27/11/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.