Plus: Sexual predator police officers, pink pineapples, and more
June 13, 2024 [View in browser]( Good morning! Today, senior correspondent Anna North is here to explain the brewing fight over American divorce. Also, a heads up: Today, Explained will be off tomorrow for a Summer Friday. I hope you can get outside to enjoy early summer weather, too. We'll be back in your inboxes Monday.
âCaroline Houck, senior editor of news [Bride and groom cake toppers on a wedding cake, facing away from each other.] Mofles via Getty Images/iStockphoto The divorce wars Before the 1960s, it was really hard to get divorced in America. Typically, the only way to do it was to convince a judge that your spouse had committed some form of wrongdoing, like adultery, abandonment, or âcrueltyâ (that is, abuse). This could be difficult: âEven if you could prove you had been hit, that didnât necessarily mean it rose to the level of cruelty that justified a divorce,â said [Marcia Zug](, a family law professor at the University of South Carolina. Then came a revolution: In 1969, then-Gov. Ronald Reagan of California (who was himself divorced) signed [the nationâs first no-fault divorce law](, allowing people to end their marriages without proving theyâd been wronged. Similar laws soon swept the country, and rates of [domestic violence and spousal murder]( began to drop as people â especially women â gained more freedom to leave dangerous situations. Today, however, a counter-revolution is brewing: [Conservative commentators]( and [lawmakers]( are calling for an end to no-fault divorce, arguing that it has harmed men and even destroyed the fabric of society. Oklahoma state Sen. Dusty Deevers, for example, [introduced a bill]( in January to ban his stateâs version of no-fault divorce. The Texas Republican Party added a call to end the practice to its [2022 platform]( (the plank is preserved in [the 2024 version](). Federal lawmakers like Sen. J.D. Vance (R-OH) and [House Speaker Mike Johnson](, as well as former Housing and Urban Development Secretary [Ben Carson](, have spoken out in favor of tightening divorce laws. If this sounds outlandish or like easily dismissed political posturing â surely Republicans donât want to turn back the clock on marital law more than 50 years â itâs worth looking back at, say, how rhetorical attacks on abortion, birth control, and IVF have become reality. In the wake of [the Dobbs decision](, divorce is just one of many areas of family law that conservative policymakers see an opportunity to rewrite. âWeâve now gotten to the point where things that werenât on the table are on the table,â Zug said. âFringe ideas are becoming much more mainstream.â [An old man and woman seen holding hands at a table.] Win McNamee/Getty Images) Republicans in multiple states are eyeing divorce restrictions Pushback against no-fault divorce dates back decades. In the 1990s and early 2000s, three states passed [covenant marriage laws](, allowing couples to opt into [signing a contract]( allowing divorce only under circumstances like abuse or abandonment. Some backers of the laws intended them to send a larger anti-divorce message, the [Maryland Daily Record reported]( in 2001. Speaker Johnson, then a lawyer in Louisiana, was an early adopter of covenant marriage, entering one with his wife Kelly in 1999. More recently, high-profile conservative commentators have taken up the anti-divorce cause. Last year, the popular right-wing podcaster Steven Crowder [announced his own unwilling split](. âMy then-wife decided that she didnât want to be married anymore,â he complained, âand in the state of Texas, that is completely permitted.â That could change. As [Tessa Stuart noted in Rolling Stone](, the Texas Republican Party controls both chambers of the state legislature and the governorâs office, and could likely make its platform â the one calling on the state legislature to ârescind unilateral no-fault divorce lawsâ â a reality if it chose. The Louisiana and Nebraska Republican parties have also considered or adopted similar language. And Ben Carson, who was HUD secretary under President Donald Trump and has been [floated as a potential VP pick](, wrote in [his recent book]( that âfor the sake of families, we should enact legislation to remove or radically reduce incidences of no-fault divorce.â [House Speaker Mike Johnson, left, and his wife Kelly Johnson, seen here attending the lighting of the US Capitol Christmas tree, are in a ''covenant marriage.''] Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images Ending no-fault divorce would have major consequences Opponents of no-fault divorce argue that it is hurting families and American culture. Making divorce too easy causes âsocial upheaval, unfettered dishonesty, lawlessness, violence towards women, war on men, and expendability of children,â [Deevers wrote last year]( in the American Reformer, a Christian publication. âTo devalue marriage is to devalue the family is to undermine the foundation of a thriving society.â Itâs worth noting that though the no-fault laws initially led to spikes in divorce, rates then began to drop, and reached a 50-year low in 2019, [CNN reports](. But today, an end to no-fault divorce would cause enormous financial, logistical, and emotional strain for people who are trying to end their marriages, experts say. Proving fault requires a trial, something many divorcing couples today avoid, said [Kristen Marinaccio](, a New Jersey-based family law attorney. A divorce trial is time-consuming and costly, putting the partner with less money at an immediate disadvantage. It can also be âreally, really traumatizingâ to have to take the stand against an ex-partner, Marinaccio said. Thereâs also no guarantee that judges will always decide cases fairly. In the days of fault-based divorce, courts were often unwilling to intervene in marriages even in cases of abuse, Zug said. No-fault divorce can be easier on children, who donât have to experience their parents facing each other in a trial, [experts say](. Research suggests that allowing such divorces increased womenâs power in marriages and even [reduced womenâs suicide rates](. A return to the old ways would turn back the clock on this progress, scholars say. âWe know exactly what happens when people canât get out of very unhappy marriages,â Zug said. âThereâs much higher incidences of domestic abuse and spousal murder.â Itâs unlikely that blue states would ban no-fault divorce, Marinaccio said, but if red states do, their residents would be stuck. Divorce laws generally include a residency requirement, which would make it difficult for people to cross state lines to get a divorce the way they sometimes do now to obtain an abortion. âYour state is the only access you have to divorce,â Marinaccio said. Divorce is extremely common â more than 670,000 American couples split [in 2022 alone](. Any rollback to no-fault divorce would likely be politically unpopular, even in red states (some of which have [higher divorce rates]( than the national average). But perhaps emboldened by their victory in overturning Roe v. Wade, social conservatives have gone after other popular targets in recent months, from [birth control]( to [IVF](. The drive to increase restrictions on divorce is part of the same movement, Zug said â an effort to re-entrench âconservative family values,â incentivize [heterosexual marriage]( and [childbearing](, and disempower women. âThey are all connected,â Zug said. â[Anna North, senior correspondent]( [Listen]( Weâre drowning in credit card debt Americans owe more than $1 trillion to credit card companies, a record sum thatâs likely to keep growing as rising interest rates prevent cardholders from paying down their debt. CNETâs Nick Wolny explains. [Listen now]( CONSUMERISM - Pink pineapples?!: Indeed, they exist. Hereâs their origin story. [[Wired](]
- How your Amazon packages get to you: Inside an Amazon warehouse in India, people say they are working 10-12 hours a day in a building without ventilation or air conditioning â even as a heat wave raised temperatures to near 120 degrees Fahrenheit. [[Hindustan Times](]
- Whoâs buying electric vehicles and whoâs not: âThe long-term outlook for EVs âremains bright,â according to a new report, but a much-discussed sales slowdown is indeed a real thing in some markets.â [[Axios](] [Stacks of gambling chips on a craps table, topped by a chess pawn.]( Getty Images AROUND THE WORLD - This feels like a bad, depressing metaphor: Remember the $230 million pier the US built to deliver aid into Gaza because it couldnât pressure its ally Israel to allow more aid through ground crossings? Remember how it was damaged in under two weeks? Apparently it was never designed to handle the Mediterranean Seaâs rough waters. [[WSJ](]
- Weâre in a new era of conflict and crisis: Can humanitarian aid keep up? [[Vox](] ALSO IN THE NEWS - Hundreds of law enforcement officers across the US have sexually abused children: And many of them avoid jail time. An investigation into this horrific trend. [[Washington Post](] Ad Whoâs the father? For these baby animals, one doesnât exist. More animals can occasionally reproduce asexually than scientists realized, explains Byrd Pinkerton. [Read more »]( Are you enjoying the Today, Explained newsletter? Forward it to a friend; they can [sign up for it right here](. And as always, we want to know what you think. Specifically: If there is a topic you want us to explain or a story youâre curious to learn more about, let us know [by filling out this form]( or just replying to this email. Today's edition was produced and edited by Caroline Houck. Again, we're off tomorrow for a Summer Friday, but we'll see you Monday! [Become a Vox Member]( Support our journalism â become a Vox Member and youâll get exclusive access to the newsroom with members-only perks including newsletters, bonus podcasts and videos, and more. [Join our community]( Ad [Facebook]( [Twitter]( [YouTube]( [Instagram]( [TikTok]( [WhatsApp]( This email was sent to {EMAIL}. Manage your [email preferences]( [unsubscribe](param=sentences). If you value Voxâs unique explanatory journalism, support our work with a one-time or recurring [contribution](. View our [Privacy Notice]( and our [Terms of Service](. Vox Media, 1701 Rhode Island. NW, Washington, DC 20036.
Copyright © 2024. All rights reserved.