Newsletter Subject

Your favorite brand no longer cares about being woke

From

vox.com

Email Address

newsletter@vox.com

Sent On

Fri, May 31, 2024 12:00 PM

Email Preheader Text

The revolution will not be advertised. vox.com/culture CULTURE ? There was a time, not so long ago

The revolution will not be advertised. vox.com/culture CULTURE   There was a time, not so long ago, where there was a “woke sneaker.” Do you remember this? Weirdos were literally [burning their shoes and cutting the logos off]( their socks because Nike had partnered with Colin Kaepernick after he famously knelt during his games’ national anthems to protest police brutality. Trump even made an extremely Trumpian tweet about it, implying the brand was “Just like the NFL, whose ratings have gone WAY DOWN” and that it was “getting absolutely killed with anger and boycotts.” But as Boston College communications scholar [Michael Serazio points out](, these days are long gone. During the Trump presidency, he argues, neutrality — even among shoe brands’ advertising campaigns — “came across as craven delusion.” Today, in a tougher advertising market, [brands and influencers are much more wary of making political statements.]( Some clients are even using AI to scrape through every potentially charged comment associated with a brand and dropping sponsors if they say anything about what is the most divisive crisis in the world right now, Israel’s war on Gaza. “Activism ain’t selling like it used to,” he writes, begging the question: Was it ever activism to begin with? —[Rebecca Jennings](, senior correspondent Your favorite brand no longer cares about being woke [illustation of an old tv set on a green background]( Getty Images For most of advertising history, “red” or “blue” as partisan loyalty signaled more your taste for Coke or Pepsi than your identity as Republican or Democrat. Mass markets, by definition, necessitated selling to both sides of the aisle. As with so much else, the presidency of Donald Trump — built upon a self-conceived human brand — radically upended those norms. Post-2016 election, one Adweek column thundered, “Brands cannot expect to play Switzerland as the rest of the world picks a side.” Consumer culture suddenly became the vehicle for political expression, with Madison Avenue giving voice to countless causes. The staid “[corporate social responsibility](” morphed into the more muscular “brand purpose” which beget impassioned activism. Social justice became “trendy;” politics, the means to signal commercial “integrity.” Today, just as during the Trump presidency, controversial issues abound, protesters convulse public spaces, and a divisive election looms. The world is picking sides — on abortion and Gaza and Trump’s trials. And from brand-land? By and large, the sound of silence. That’s because, despite prior pretense, advertising follows, not leads; it needs markets, not morality. That silence, therefore, says much about our sociopolitical moment: As culture warriors find themselves on the defensive, brands, wary from the backlash against Bud Light’s use of a trans influencer, [no longer show interest in advancing their causes](. Indeed, today’s primary “cause” — and, arguably, election issue — is lower on the hierarchy of needs: cost of living. That makes for a more practical, less symbolic battleground for commercial content. In 2024, whatever else might happen, the revolution will not be advertised. [Read the full story »]( Why the uncanny “All eyes on Rafah” image went so viral In the wake of another deadly attack by Israel, a seemingly AI-generated image has circulated on Instagram Stories. [Read the full story »]( Leaked video reveals the lie of Miss Universe’s empowerment promise “The trans women, the women with husbands, divorced women ... They can compete but they cannot win.” [Read the full story »](   [Become a Vox Member]( Support our journalism — become a Vox Member and you’ll get exclusive access to the newsroom with members-only perks including newsletters, bonus podcasts and videos, and more. [Join our community](   More good stuff to read today - [The Sympathizer takes on Hollywood’s Vietnam War stories]( - [Actually, you should say something if you hate your friend's partner]( - [The WNBA's meteoric rise in popularity, in one chart]( - [How to care for people in your life with intellectual disabilities]( - [Hacks shows cancel culture is a joke]( - Furiosa’s hard-won feminism](   [Facebook]( [Twitter]( [YouTube]( Manage your [email preferences]( or [unsubscribe](param=culture). If you value Vox’s unique explanatory journalism, support our work with a one-time or recurring [contribution](. View our [Privacy Policy]( and our [Terms of Service](. Vox Media, 1201 Connecticut Ave. NW, Floor 12, Washington, DC 20036. Copyright © 2024. All rights reserved.

Marketing emails from vox.com

View More
Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

05/12/2024

Sent On

03/12/2024

Sent On

29/11/2024

Sent On

27/11/2024

Sent On

27/11/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.