Newsletter Subject

AI still needs people

From

vox.com

Email Address

newsletter@vox.com

Sent On

Fri, May 17, 2024 12:00 PM

Email Preheader Text

What a Zoom cashier has to say about the depressing future of work. vox.com/culture CULTURE ? My i

What a Zoom cashier has to say about the depressing future of work. vox.com/culture CULTURE   My interactions with artificial intelligence have largely left me feeling pretty confident that we still need humans to do most things right. Turns out business owners agree: When employers integrate AI and other automation into their store checkouts, fast food drive-throughs, or vehicles, humans are a necessary part of the plan. Tech romantics may envision this integration as an elevated form of work, a human-robot nexus that’s somehow greater than the sum of its parts. But as my colleague Whizy Kim [writes](, it’s actually, and unsurprisingly, less than ideal — especially for the humans involved. In industries where employers are eagerly embracing AI, human roles are shrinking and often getting outsourced to exploitative labor markets overseas. The resulting quality isn’t necessarily better, but whatever’s getting made sure is cheaper to produce. This isn’t a new dynamic, Kim writes; technological advances have been degrading work and workers for centuries. In fact, it’s in labor’s history that she sees at least part of the way forward. Without collective power, the world’s workers face an ever more fragmented future. —[Keren Landman](, senior reporter, Even Better P.S. We’ve launched a new newsletter! SCOTUS, Explained brings you analysis of what the Supreme Court is doing straight to your inbox. [Sign up here](. What a Zoom cashier 8,000 miles away can tell us about the future of work [a robot and a business man facing away from each other]( Franco Zacha for Vox Questions of how a new technology will change the way we work have only become more pressing since OpenAI’s Chat-GPT burst onto the scene in late 2022. Since then, we’ve seen frenzied predictions of how [AI]( will upend American jobs — perhaps [even doing away with the need to work altogether](. Some wonder if their careers will even exist in a few years. Chances are, they will, but the tasks they do might be different. How exactly that will happen can feel obscure, but it’s been happening in much the same way for decades if not centuries. To put a human face on the way technology changes jobs, visit a fried chicken spot called Sansan Chicken in New York City’s East Village. There, the cashier takes your order over Zoom, from over 8,000 miles away in the Philippines. Another worker in the kitchen slides your order through a small window when it’s ready. These workers are employed by a company called Happy Cashier, which contracts them out to a handful of NYC-based restaurants. The big draw of Happy Cashier is that it saves the restaurants money, as the average hourly wage of a cashier in the Philippines is [about $1](, based on Indeed’s data. Happy Cashier’s “virtual assistants” make $3 per hour, according to the [New York Times](. While video calling isn’t bleeding-edge tech, the Zoom cashier captures what often happens when an industry integrates new tech into its business model: Jobs don’t really disappear, they just shrink, along with their paycheck, and this degradation is presented as the natural outcome of automation and technological progress. [Read the full story »]( Inside the bombshell scandal that prompted two Miss USAs to step down Allegations of a “toxic work environment” have once again tarnished the pageant’s reputation. [Read the full story »]( Bridgerton’s third season is its best yet — but not because of romance The fractured friendship between Pen and Eloise centers the Netflix hit. [Read the full story »](   Support our work We aim to explain what we buy, why we buy it, and why it matters. Support our mission by making a gift today. [Give](   More good stuff to read today - [Back to Black is the worst of bad musical biopics]( - [That’s that who espresso? Sabrina Carpenter, explained.]( - [How to fight without ruining a relationship]( - [So, what was the point of John Mulaney’s live Netflix talk show?]( - Macklemore’s anthem for Gaza is a rarity: A protest song in an era of apolitical music]( - [Meme stocks like GameStop are soaring like it’s 2021](   [Facebook]( [Twitter]( [YouTube]( Manage your [email preferences]( or [unsubscribe](param=culture). If you value Vox’s unique explanatory journalism, support our work with a one-time or recurring [contribution](. View our [Privacy Policy]( and our [Terms of Service](. Vox Media, 1201 Connecticut Ave. NW, Floor 12, Washington, DC 20036. Copyright © 2024. All rights reserved.

Marketing emails from vox.com

View More
Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

05/12/2024

Sent On

03/12/2024

Sent On

29/11/2024

Sent On

27/11/2024

Sent On

27/11/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.