Newsletter Subject

The post-Roe abortion paradox

From

vox.com

Email Address

newsletter@vox.com

Sent On

Wed, Mar 20, 2024 11:01 AM

Email Preheader Text

Plus: Gamergate 2.0, heat pumps for your home, and more. March 20, 2024 Good morning! Senior reporte

Plus: Gamergate 2.0, heat pumps for your home, and more. March 20, 2024 [View in browser]( Good morning! Senior reporter Rachel Cohen is here to dig into some surprising new data about abortion in America. —Caroline Houck, senior editor of news   [woman holding a bandana stating bans off our bodies] Kent Nishimura / Los Angeles Times via Getty Images Abortion in the US has gone up. Yes, up. To understand the evolving landscape for abortion in the United States, you have to consider two seemingly contradictory things. The first: [The overturn of Roe v. Wade]( has led to unprecedented attacks on abortion, with [nearly half of states]( banning or planning to ban the procedure since June 2022. Yet the second: The overall incidence of abortion has increased. In fact, according to [new data]( published yesterday by the Guttmacher Institute, a reproductive health research group, there were more abortions in the formal US health care system in 2023 than in any year since 2011. To get even more granular, there were approximately 1 million abortions last year, a 10 percent increase over the number from 2020. So what gives? How is this possible? We have some sense of what’s driving the increase The first underlying factor is that travel out of state for abortion has gone up, offsetting some of the newer restrictions in states with bans. More than 160,000 people crossed state lines to end pregnancies in 2023, per Guttmacher, almost double the number that did so [in 2020](. This isn’t to say the burden of state restrictions has been offset. “Even if people can travel, doing so comes with significant financial and logistical cost,” Isaac Maddow-Zimet, lead researcher at Guttmacher, told me. “And it’s only been possible because there’s been a lot of support from folks like abortion funds, and we don’t know how sustainable that [funding] will be long term.” Another factor explaining the overall increase is that more residents living in states without restrictions are getting abortions. This seems to have been driven primarily by improved access policies in those states, like expansion of [telehealth medicine](, more [sliding-scale payment options](, and [wider Medicaid coverage](. Some of these efforts began before 2022, though many picked up steam after the Supreme Court’s ruling. “The broader context is that access anywhere has never been particularly great, and cost has always been a pretty substantial barrier even before Dobbs,” said Maddow-Zimet. Another factor likely driving the increase is that more people are choosing to end pregnancies through [medication abortion]( — the two-drug combination of mifepristone and misoprostol. Use of these pills has been trending up over time, but Guttmacher found a particularly big jump over the last three years, where medication abortion accounted for 63 percent of all US abortions in the formal health care system in 2023, up from 53 percent in 2020. There are a lot of reasons why people might choose to use [this effective option](, which researchers have found to be safe and with a very low risk of complications. Some patients lack access to in-person abortion clinics (both in the states that’ve outright banned abortion since 2022 or just in rural and otherwise underserved regions). Other people may simply prefer to end pregnancies in the comfort of their own home or seek out the pills because they can [cost less]( than surgical abortion. [pro-reproductive rights protest] Bill Tiernan/The Virginian-Pilot/Tribune News Service via Getty Images So ... what happens next? Given that so many people are turning to abortion pills, it should come as no surprise that the anti-abortion movement [has ramped up its efforts]( to restrict access to the medication since the overturn of Roe. The US Supreme Court will be hearing a case next week that could lead to even more [restrictions on mifepristone](, a drug that has been FDA-approved since 2000. Still, despite these legal threats and the looming possibility of a future Trump administration using [the executive branch to further crack down]( on the pills, thus far advocates for abortion rights have made tremendous gains in expanding access to the medication since Roe’s overturn. As [I’ve previously reported for Vox](, it’s never been easier, faster, and cheaper to access abortion medication nationwide, even in red states with total abortion bans. Some of this is driven by the growth of new shield laws, where blue-state abortion providers can now mail pills to people living in states where abortion is illegal. Some of it is thanks to the growth of e-commerce sites and other international providers, which have collectively and significantly brought down the cost for patients. Even if the US Supreme Court bans mifepristone this summer or places new restrictions on the drug, many of these alternative methods would remain intact, and many abortion providers would switch to providing [misoprostol-only]( regimens. In other words, the anti-abortion movement is going to have a really hard time stopping people from ending pregnancies they don’t want. But okay, here’s what we still don’t know when it comes to figuring out why abortion incidence is going up. The big remaining unknown is whether the increase we’ve seen has been driven in part by people’s shifting childbearing decisions. Do fewer people want to have kids now? Do more people want to delay having kids? Researchers aren’t sure. Maddow-Zimet tells me this is a particularly difficult thing to measure, and there’s been almost no quality data on changes in people’s intention to have children since Roe’s overturn. (Though we might get some soon with next year’s [National Survey of Family Growth](.) An even bigger unknown: How many people wanted to end a pregnancy since Dobbs but weren’t able to? That sort of data is critical to know but has always been extremely difficult to collect, and we still don’t have reliable methods to do so. Given all these unknowns, not to mention uncertainty with the upcoming presidential election and future funding streams, it’s hard to say how and whether these abortion trends will continue. We’ll be keeping a close watch. [—Rachel Cohen, senior reporter](   [Listen]( How gangs took over Haiti Haiti’s latest crisis is being driven by something new: The country’s gangs have united, and they are demanding political power. [Listen now](   CULTURE - Gamergate 2: Here we go again. This time “smaller and sadder.” [[Verge](] - Italo-disco?!: Say less! Cue up [this playlist]( as you dig into the history of the genre. [[Dirt](] POLITICS - Yesterday, the Supreme Court was surprisingly moderate. But that was yesterday: The Court’s shocking new immigration order, explained. [[Vox](] - Should Democrats be more concerned about Biden’s unpopularity?: Checking in, about eight months before Election Day. [[Good Authority](] [two SCOTUS justices]( Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images HOME AND SELF - An incentive to file your taxes: Hopefully you’ll get a return. Here are some fun ways to spend it if you do. [[Vox](] - How’s your home heated?: “Installing a heat pump now is better for the climate, even if it's run on U.S. electricity generated mostly by fossil fuels. Here’s why.” [[Grist](]   Ad  [Learn more about RevenueStripe...](   The bleeding edge, part two Diagnosing diseases such as endometriosis can require difficult steps, like surgery. But researchers are hoping to use menstrual fluid to make detecting the condition much easier. [Listen now](   Are you enjoying the Today, Explained newsletter? Forward it to a friend; they can [sign up for it right here](. And as always, we want to know what you think. We recently changed the format of this newsletter. Any questions, comments, or ideas? We're all ears. Specifically: If there is a topic you want us to explain or a story you’re curious to learn more about, let us know [by filling out this form]( or just replying to this email. Today's edition was edited and produced by Caroline Houck. We'll see you tomorrow!   Ad  [Learn more about RevenueStripe...](   [Facebook]( [Twitter]( [YouTube]( [Instagram]( [TikTok]( [WhatsApp]( This email was sent to {EMAIL}. Manage your [email preferences]( [unsubscribe](param=sentences). If you value Vox’s unique explanatory journalism, support our work with a one-time or recurring [contribution](. View our [Privacy Notice]( and our [Terms of Service](. Vox Media, 1701 Rhode Island Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20036. Copyright © 2024. All rights reserved.

Marketing emails from vox.com

View More
Sent On

25/05/2024

Sent On

24/05/2024

Sent On

24/05/2024

Sent On

24/05/2024

Sent On

23/05/2024

Sent On

22/05/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2024 SimilarMail.