Newsletter Subject

USDA Requests Public Input on Revision of Biotechnology Regulations

From

usda.gov

Email Address

APHISBRS@subscribers.usda.gov

Sent On

Wed, Jan 18, 2017 03:14 PM

Email Preheader Text

Having trouble viewing this email? Dear BRS Stakeholder, The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Anima

Having trouble viewing this email? [View it as a Web page]. [Bookmark and Share] Dear BRS Stakeholder, The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) is announcing proposed revisions to its biotechnology regulations in a notice that will publish in the Federal Register on January 19, 2017. The proposed rule updates the regulations in a number of areas, all within the Agency’s current statutory authority under the Plant Protection Act passed into law in 2000. The proposed rule is based on the best available science, will better enable APHIS to focus its resources on regulating genetically engineered (GE) organisms that may pose plant pest or noxious weed risks, and will enhance regulatory flexibilities that stimulate innovation and competitiveness. In developing the proposed rule, APHIS carefully considered comments received during public scoping and comment periods related to withdrawal of a 2008 proposed rule, as well as comments relative to a March 2016 notice of intent to conduct a programmatic environmental impact statement, recommendations made in two Office of the Inspector General audits, recent advances in biotechnology, provisions in the 2008 Farm Bill, and the Agency’s accumulated experience in implementing the current regulations. This would be the first comprehensive revision of the regulations since they were established in 1987. APHIS is proposing a regulatory program in which it first assesses GE organisms to determine if they pose plant pest or noxious weed risks. If APHIS concludes that a GE organism does not pose a plant pest or noxious weed risk, then APHIS would not require a permit for the importation, interstate movement, and environmental release (outdoor use) of the GE organism. On the other hand, if APHIS determines, based on risk analysis that controls on movement are needed, APHIS will work with the requestor to establish appropriate permit conditions to manage identified risks to allow safe movement. By “movement” we mean import, interstate movement, or environmental release (regulated controlled outdoor use such as in field trials). GE plants that are not engineered with plant pest sequences do not fall under our current regulations even though they may pose noxious weed risks. We are proposing to implement the noxious weed authority to close this gap. Our goals for the proposed revisions are to ensure a high level of plant health protection based on the best available science; improve regulatory processes so that they are more transparent, efficient, and predictable for stakeholders and the public; and provide regulatory relief that will stimulate innovation and competitiveness. APHIS’ proposed rule will be available for public review and comments will be accepted for 120 days beginning January 19, 2017, through May 19, 2017. After the public comment period closes, we will decide how or whether to finalize the regulations based on our evaluation of public comments to the proposed revisions. Additionally, we will make available a draft programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) that we intend to publish for public comment soon, and we look forward to stakeholder input. We also intend to have public meetings on the proposed rule during the comment period. The associated documents and any updates can be viewed on the [BRS News Webpage]. --------------------------------------------------------------- [Bookmark and Share] [USDA Logo] Questions about APHIS programs and services? [Contact Us] STAY CONNECTED: [Visit Us on Twitter] [Visit Us on YouTube] [Sign up for email updates] SUBSCRIBER SERVICES: [Manage Preferences] | [Unsubscribe] | [Help] --------------------------------------------------------------- This email was sent to {EMAIL} using GovDelivery, on behalf of: USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service · 4700 River Rd · Riverdale, MD 20737 [Powered by GovDelivery]

usda.gov

APHIS Biotechnology Regulatory Services

Marketing emails from usda.gov

View More
Sent On

04/12/2024

Sent On

07/10/2024

Sent On

03/10/2024

Sent On

02/10/2024

Sent On

24/09/2024

Sent On

20/09/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.