Newsletter Subject

Weekly Alert: Is All Your Content Loaded?

From

ubm.com

Email Address

cmi@news.contentinstitute.com

Sent On

Fri, Oct 2, 2020 03:02 PM

Email Preheader Text

mlns='> Next week! CMWorld returns / Weekly News 10.2.20 Connect with CMI 2021 B2B Content Marketing

mlns='> Next week! CMWorld returns [View Message in Browser]( / [Add Us to Safe Sender List]( Weekly News 10.2.20 Connect with CMI 2021 B2B Content Marketing: What Now? [New Research] In its 11th year, the annual Content Marketing Institute B2B research delves into industry benchmarks, budgets, and trends. But this year we added one more category – how you and your peers responded to the pandemic and plan for the new normal. [Read more]( By Stephanie Stahl [Trends and Research] Some more of this week's best stuff: - [Top 17+ Metrics to Evaluate Content Marketing Success]( [Ann Gynn]( [Measurement and Reporting] - [Create and Serve Accessible Content to Your Audience]( Melissa Eggleston [Content Creation] - [How to Find Writers and Help Them Deliver Successful Content]( Chris Gillespie [Editorial Process and Teams] - [Don't Let a Pause Stop You From Doing More [The Weekly Wrap]]( Content Marketing Institute Team [Trends and Research] - [Do the Math: Creativity by the Numbers Won’t Add Up]( Jonathan Crossfield [Chief Content Officer Exclusive] Join Our Weekly Wrap News Crew Did you come across an exciting content idea, unique example, or puzzling trend this week? Help us share it with your fellow Content Marketing Institute readers by completing [this form](. If we include your submission in an upcoming Weekly Wrap, we’ll credit you as the source of the inspiration.  A Note From Robert Rose Is All Your Content Loaded? For a research piece I’m writing, I’ve been searching for and reading thought leadership papers lately on everything from technology to customer experience research to the future of work. The papers have offered a mixed bag when it comes to value. It doesn’t surprise me at all that a recent LinkedIn and Edelman study found that only [15% of decision-makers]( rate the quality of the thought leadership they’ve read as “excellent.” I’m fascinated by how many of the papers start with a loaded question as their hypothesis. A “loaded question” is one that pushes an answer that serves the questioner’s agenda, no matter the specific reply. This approach has become increasingly popular in media and politics. Think of headline questions such as, “Do you think the media purposely divides Republicans and Democrats?” Even if you say “no,” you’re still admitting that the media divides people. It just does so accidentally. You might see this question in your social media feed: “Are you actually going to vote for this corrupt politician?” There’s no way to answer that question without agreeing to the assumption that the politician is corrupt. I’ve seen a lot of “loaded content” in the thought leadership that I’ve been consuming. I’ve changed the names so I don't throw anyone under a bus here, but I’ve seen some doozy titles and opening hypotheses. For example, I read a whitepaper called, Are You Still Pursuing a Failed Digital Transformation? I watched a conference talk called, Will CMOs Abandon Unreachable Content Personalization? I read an eBook that was entirely based on the question/premise of, “should today’s successful CMO be worried about the high value of third-party data that is increasingly difficult to obtain?” Interestingly, in all those pieces, the arguments themselves were pretty solid. But I was so turned off by the loaded questions in their premises that I started poking holes in the argument and ended up suspicious of the entire piece. As creators of thought leadership, content marketers are taught to take a side, to have an agenda, an argument, a point of view. I’d hazard a bet (with zero empirical evidence) that thought leadership promoted with a loaded question performs better in terms of downloads or views. As I research this more, I may discover that I have a similar relationship to loaded questions as I do with pop-ups on websites. I hate them – but I know they work. Even if you have an agenda – and even if loaded headlines perform better – I advise you to watch out for loaded questions in your content. They’re easy traps to fall into. I’ve done it myself – and I plan to avoid them from now on. A great thought leadership piece lets the audience feel a sense of self-discovery of the argument. You have the biggest impact when you guide someone on a journey that lets them feel like they discovered the right answer to your questions. Loaded questions are a lazy way out of building a more fulfilling argument. If you avoid loaded content, you might lose in terms of the numbers you reach. But you’ll gain in terms of the deeper impact it has on those who consume it. It’s your story. Tell it well. Robert Rose Chief Strategy Advisor Content Marketing Institute This article from Robert is available only in this newsletter for you, the newsletter subscriber. If you have friends that would see value in Robert's weekly updates, please have them [subscribe](.  Content Marketing Job Listings Currently on a job search? Thinking about switching gears with your career? Please check out our job listings below. Available Positions: - Content Manager, EnviroLogix, Portland, ME/Remote - [Learn More]( Interested in posting a job here? Please see our [CMI Careers page]( for more info.  More from CMI Don't miss out! Network and learn with the best at this year's Content Marketing World. While virtual, we still have the same level of amazing programming, some fun networking opportunities and ways to connect with your peers, and easy access to tech solutions that will help you shine in 2021. Join us October 13-16 online. [Use code COMMUNITY to save $150 off any virtual pass.]( [»]( [COVID-19 CONTENT MARKETING RESOURCES]( Events [Content Marketing World]( [ContentTECH Summit]( [Master Classes]( [Content Marketing Awards]( Resources [Research]( [White Paper/eBook Library]( [Content VIPs]( [CMI Business Directory]( Education [Content Marketing University]( [Chief Content Officer]( [Webinars]( [Career Center]( Interested in advertising with CMI? [Learn more]( [.]( To stop receiving future Content Marketing Institute update emails, please respond [here](. Copyright © 2020 Informa Connect, All rights reserved Content Marketing Institute, an Informa Connect brand 605 3rd Ave | New York | NY 10158 [Terms of Service]( | [Privacy Statement]( [informa tech]

Marketing emails from ubm.com

View More
Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

05/12/2024

Sent On

05/12/2024

Sent On

09/11/2024

Sent On

08/11/2024

Sent On

07/11/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.