Newsletter Subject

BLACKLIST: The Top Tech Stocks to AVOID Right Now

From

trendtraderdaily.com

Email Address

newsletter@trendtraderdaily.com

Sent On

Tue, Sep 20, 2022 06:33 PM

Email Preheader Text

You're receiving this email as part of your subscription to Lou Basenese’s Trend Trader Daily .

You're receiving this email as part of your subscription to Lou Basenese’s Trend Trader Daily [Unsubscribe](. [Trend Trader Daily] BLACKLIST: The Top Tech Stocks to AVOID Right Now Tuesday, September 20, 2022 This week, we’ll be doing something a little different in Trend Trader Daily. Since the Federal Reserve is set to raise interest rates this week, I want to share a list of 15 companies that could end up being the next “busted” tech stocks. All of them have already started diving in price, and more importantly, they’re diving based on my “bust” scoring system — a brutal combination of bad fundamentals, bad trends, and bad tech. Here’s a rundown on all the stocks, as well as my research about why each is struggling now, and why each is destined to keep struggling… > ADVERTISEMENT < AI to Disrupt Energy Market (Huge Potential Gains!) This orb represents the largest untapped energy source in the world... And although this energy resource is unknown by 99% of the public... It makes gas, coal, oil, wind, hydropower, solar, fusion... It makes them all look like small fries... In fact, just one year of this untapped resource in the USA alone provides 5X as much power as the largest oil field on Earth... And this resource is about to be unleashed on the world like never before with the help of one tiny Silicon Valley company... [Click here for all the details...]( Streaming Disasters Not long ago, during an appearance on Fox Business, I [predicted]( that one of the newest streaming services on the scene, CNN+, was “absolutely doomed.” Guess what? A day later, news hit that CNN+ would be shuttered… after less than a month of operations! We couldn’t ask for more compelling proof that consumers are streamed out. Truth is, we binged too much on all the new content. As you can see in the chart below, 35% of consumers now pay for four or more streaming services. That’s up from just 11% a few years ago. And it’s just not sustainable. (click image to enlarge) Remember, the original value proposition for unbundling TV programming was that it would be cheaper for us to consume only the content we wanted. The unbundling went too far, though, and now the combined cost of individual streaming services is starting to outstrip the cost of traditional TV. Simply put, consumers overindulged, signing up for an average of 4.7 services per household, and now they’re cash-strapped as they contend with soaring inflation and a potential recession. What’s more, there are no more low-hanging subscribers for leading streaming-service providers to sign up to make up for the cancellations. Look no further than Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) for proof of the flailing industry growth dynamics: - Pre-pandemic, Netflix added about 30 million net new subscribers per year. - Last year, the company added 20 million. - Yet over the last 12 months, Netflix only managed to add 11 million net new subscribers. Not only that, but upstart Disney+ just surpassed Netflix’s total subscriber count and it took less than three years. Against this low growth and intensely competitive backdrop, of course, streaming companies keep stubbornly spending too much on content. Netflix alone plans to spend $17 billion this year. Overspending on content while struggling to add new subscribers is not a recipe for soaring profit growth and stock prices. And while analysts at Morgan Stanley want to downplay the latest trends in the industry as the “first streaming recession,” it’s much more severe than that. Streaming has become a commoditized product, with so many competitors that all the margins are about to be squeezed out of the industry. Add in runaway inflation and the additional strain it puts on discretionary spending, and the subscriber trends will only accelerate from here. In the wrong direction. Sure, streaming companies want investors to believe they can reinvigorate growth with ad-supported tiers and finally start charging for households that are using someone else’s account, among other things. But such moves smack of desperation. And in the end, they won’t be able to overcome the underlying problem of saturated markets, too many streaming choices, and no switching costs. Add it all up, and it spells more trouble ahead for these three particularly vulnerable streaming companies, and in turn, their stock prices: - Netflix, Inc. (NFLX). - Roku, Inc. (ROKU). - fuboTV Inc. (FUBO). By the way, remember to keep an eye on your inbox… To continue my “busted tech” theme this week, on Thursday, I’ll show you which Social Media stocks are set to bust. Write down the names I give you — and look out below! Until then…   FOR TREND TRADER PRO READERS ONLY > [LEARN MORE]( < Ahead of the tape, Lou Basenese Founder & Chief Investment Strategist   Copyright © Trend Trader Daily, All rights reserved. You signed up on []( Our mailing address is: Trend Trader Daily 301 S. Perimeter Park Dr. Suite 100 Nashville, Tennessee 37211 [Update Subscription Preferences]( | [Unsubscribe from this list]( RISK NOTICE: All investing comes with risk. That includes the investments teased in this letter. You should never invest more than you can afford to lose. Please use this research for the purpose that it's intended — as research only. You should consult a professional financial advisor before ever taking a position in any securities you see herein. SECURITY HOLDING NOTICE: Although we are never compensated from any companies for coverage, you should be aware that Trend Trader Daily, its authors, its owners, and its employees may purchase, sell, or hold long or short positions in securities of the companies mentioned in this communication. While authors might actively transact in the securities mentioned, they will always have a net position that is consistent with the position set forth in our research reports, letters and updates. DISCLAIMERS: The work included in this communication is based on diverse sources including SEC filings, current events, interviews, corporate press releases, and information published on funding platforms, but the views we express and the conclusions we reach are our own. As such, this content may contain errors, and any investments described in this content should be made only after reviewing the filings and/or financial statements of the company, and only after consulting with your investment advisor. Actual results may differ significantly from the results described herein. Furthermore, nothing published by Trend Trader Daily, Inc should be considered personalized financial advice. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized investment advice. Trend Trader Daily is an independent provider of education, information and research on publicly traded companies, and as such, it accepts no direct or indirect compensation from any companies or third parties mentioned in any of our letters, reports or updates.

Marketing emails from trendtraderdaily.com

View More
Sent On

06/12/2022

Sent On

04/12/2022

Sent On

02/12/2022

Sent On

28/11/2022

Sent On

28/11/2022

Sent On

26/11/2022

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.