The US Bank Account Freeze: Is It Closer Than You Think? – ⋆July 01⋆

In 2022, it hit closer to home — in Canada. The government used its 1988 Emergency Act to freeze the bank accounts of hundreds of striking truckers. Think nothing like this could happen in the United States? If so, think again. [Trading Century]( A note from the Editor: Trading Century is dedicated to providing readers like you with unique opportunities. The message below from one of our business associates is one we believe you should take a serious look at. [divider] Dear Subscriber, In 1990, the Brazilian government froze the bank accounts of thousands of citizens. In 2013, the victims were the people of Cyprus. In 2022, it hit closer to home — in Canada. The government used its 1988 Emergency Act to freeze the bank accounts of hundreds of striking truckers. Think nothing like this could happen in the United States? If so, think again. Empirical evidence for a proposition is evidence, i.e. what supports or counters this proposition, that is constituted by or accessible to sense experience or experimental procedure. Empirical evidence is of central importance to the sciences and plays a role in various other fields, like epistemology and law. There is no general agreement on how the terms evidence and empirical are to be defined. Often different fields work with quite different conceptions. In epistemology, evidence is what justifies beliefs or what determines whether holding a certain belief is rational. This is only possible if the evidence is possessed by the person, which has prompted various epistemologists to conceive evidence as private mental states like experiences or other beliefs. In philosophy of science, on the other hand, evidence is understood as that which confirms or disconfirms scientific hypotheses and arbitrates between competing theories. For this role, it is important that evidence is public and uncontroversial, like observable physical objects or events and unlike private mental states, so that evidence may foster scientific consensus. The term empirical comes from Greek ἐμπειρία empeiría, i.e. 'experience'. In this context, it is usually understood as what is observable, in contrast to unobservable or theoretical objects. It is generally accepted that unaided perception constitutes observation, but it is disputed to what extent objects accessible only to aided perception, like bacteria seen through a microscope or positrons detected in a cloud chamber, should be regarded as observable. Empirical evidence is essential to a posteriori knowledge or empirical knowledge, knowledge whose justification or falsification depends on experience or experiment. A priori knowledge, on the other hand, is seen either as innate or as justified by rational intuition and therefore as not dependent on empirical evidence. Rationalism fully accepts that there is knowledge a priori, which is either outright rejected by empiricism or accepted only in a restricted way as knowledge of relations between our concepts but not as pertaining to the external world. Scientific evidence is closely related to empirical evidence but not all forms of empirical evidence meet the standards dictated by scientific methods. Sources of empirical evidence are sometimes divided into observation and experimentation, the difference being that only experimentation involves manipulation or intervention: phenomena are actively created instead of being passively observed. [the plan]( The Federal Reserve System Docket No. OP-1670, reveals the plan. See front page is right here. It gives the Fed the power to track and potentially even control your checking account. Not just the money you have in your account at the moment … But also, every single check, withdrawal, deposit, and transaction. Practically everything you do with your money! [You can find out the eerie details by clicking here.]( Be sure to do so with urgency. Background[edit] Main article: Evidence The concept of evidence is of central importance in epistemology and in philosophy of science but plays different roles in these two fields.[1][2] In epistemology, evidence is what justifies beliefs or what determines whether holding a certain doxastic attitude is rational.[3][4][5] For example, the olfactory experience of smelling smoke justifies or makes it rational to hold the belief that something is burning. It is usually held that for justification to work, the evidence has to be possessed by the believer. The most straightforward way to account for this type of evidence possession is to hold that evidence consists of the private mental states possessed by the believer.[6][7] Some philosophers restrict evidence even further, for example, to only conscious, propositional or factive mental states.[2] Restricting evidence to conscious mental states has the implausible consequence that many simple everyday beliefs would be unjustified. This is why it is more common to hold that all kinds of mental states, including stored but currently unconscious beliefs, can act as evidence.[6][7] Various of the roles played by evidence in reasoning, for example, in explanatory, probabilistic and deductive reasoning, suggest that evidence has to be propositional in nature, i.e. that it is correctly expressed by propositional attitude verbs like "believe" together with a that-clause, like "that something is burning".[8][1][9] But it runs counter to the common practice of treating non-propositional sense-experiences, like bodily pains, as evidence.[1][10] Its defenders sometimes combine it with the view that evidence has to be factive, i.e. that only attitudes towards true propositions constitute evidence.[8] In this view, there is no misleading evidence. The olfactory experience of smoke would count as evidence if it was produced by a fire but not if it was produced by a smoke generator. This position has problems in explaining why it is still rational for the subject to believe A pilot program is already underway. The next step is to roll it out to nearly every bank in America. [Click here to learn how to protect your money](. Good luck and God bless! [Martin Weiss] Martin D. Weiss, PhD Weiss Ratings Founder P.S. This is not about a digital currency. It's very different. [Find out exactly what it is here.]( [divider] This email is being delivered to you as you have expressed an interest in the Financial niche by submitting your information on one of our landing pages or sign-up forms. [Privacy Policy]( [Terms & Conditions]( Email sent by Finance and Investing Traffic, LLC, owner and operator of Trading Century 11780 US Highway 1 Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33408-3080 Would you like to [edit your e-mail notification preferences or unsubscribe]( from our mailing list? Copyright © 2023 Weiss Ratings. All rights reserved. If you need any assistance or have any inquiries, our [support team](mailto:support@tradingcentury.com) is available round the clock, 24/7, to assist you at every step. For any security-related questions or concerns, please feel free to reach out to us by sending an email to abuse@tradingcentury.com. Don’t miss out on the latest developments in the world of investing and finance, [whitelist our email address]( to receive timely updates. Copyright © 2023 [TradingCentury.com](. All rights reserved[.]( 221 W 9th St # Wilmington, DE 19801   [Unsubscribe](