Newsletter Subject

I’ll Never Look at Investing the Same Way Again

From

tradestops.com

Email Address

PowerTrends@exct.tradesmith.com

Sent On

Sat, Feb 17, 2024 01:31 PM

Email Preheader Text

To view this email as a web page, go .) And I got a great question from one of your fellow readers.

To view this email as a web page, go [here.]( [Power Trends] I’ll Never Look at Investing the Same Way Again My quantitative analysis system is based on a stunningly simple premise... Own the best. Easy to understand, right? Not as easy to do. Hence all the time and money that went into developing my system – identifying the right data to collect and then designing the algorithms to analyze it the right way. I have used this system with great success every day since I completed it 15 years ago. And I continue using it in my personal investing, my institutional research business, and my research services helping investors like you. I recently wrote here in Power Trends about how finding and investing in these leaders can change your financial life. ([You can read it here]( And I got a great question from one of your fellow readers. I showed how the top three stocks in the iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) have dramatically outperformed the ETF itself. If you had bought Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), Broadcom (AVGO), and Nvidia (NVDA) in late 2011, you would have averaged returns of 94X – nearly seven times more than the ETF. One of our readers wrote in with a great point: Jason... I'm curious what the top 3 holdings in the SOXX were in late 2011? According to your suggested methodology and performance analysis that would have been the time to select and invest in the best stocks of SOXX. Your 94X performance is remarkable and enticing; however, it does assume you knew in late 2011 what the top 3 stocks would be in Jan 2024. I am curious what the performance calculation would look like if you had invested in the top 3 of late 2011 and held to today. I would love to have you show me those results. I think that's the realistic performance comparison to make. Afterall, we can't invest in the past. We can only invest today with today's information. You’re absolutely right. So, let’s find out... RECOMMENDED LINK [Elon Musk’s “A.I. 2.0” Could Leave 800 Million Unemployed.]( Maybe you’ve seen Goldman Sachs’s forecast that the $15.7 trillion A.I. revolution will impact 300 million jobs. But Elon Musk’s “A.I. 2.0” is already forcing organizations to ramp up those estimates. Now McKinsey analysts say it could leave 800 million unemployed, as Wired.com says 70% of occupations could be replaced. Where could you and your family stand in all this? [Get details here]( The Results – Including Current Quantum Scores The first step was to find the ETF’s top holdings from 2011. I dug into this and found form N-CSR that iShares submitted to the SEC in 2011 disclosing the fund's holdings. ([You can see the original document here]( if you’re interested.) The top three holdings by weight at the end of 2011 were Intel (INTC), Broadcom (AVGO), and Applied Materials (AMAT). Here’s how they’ve done since Dec. 1, 2011... The average return is 2,549%, which still doubles the ETF’s overall return. If we look at those three stocks today, we find the one with the lowest return, Intel, also has the lowest rating in my system with a Quantum Score of 51.7. The other two are both in my buy zone. Broadcom’s Quantum Score is 81, and Applied Materials tops the trio with a Quantum Score of 84.5. TradeSmith Finance and MAPsignals.com AMAT was an outlier then, and it’s an outlier today. It’s well positioned to benefit from increasing demand for newer and better semiconductors, which are driving the next technology revolution that is unfolding right now. Shares just hit a new all-time high yesterday after the company easily beat earnings and sales expectations. The stock is up 50% in our [TradeSmith Investment Report portfolio]( in just five months. And while it may be a little overheated in the short term, it maintains great long-term potential. Leaders Lead It’s true that we can’t go back in time, superimpose today’s leaders, and say we would have bought them back then. That wasn’t what I was trying to do, and I apologize if that wasn’t clear. I was really going for a broader point, which is this: To build wealth, you must own the outliers. Outliers are the stocks with superior fundamentals, strong technicals, and clear indications that they are getting bought by the biggest investors on Earth. Consistently owning these stocks has allowed me to [beat the market by 7-to-1 since 1990]( according to independent testing by TradeSmith. It also allows me to bring that same stellar performance to my readers. It’s how 16 of the 17 current stocks in [TradeSmith Investment Report]( are making us money – a 94% success rate. Those 16 stocks average 27.6% gains compared to one loser that is down just 2.1%. If you want to not just make money in the market but outperform it and truly grow your wealth, then you must own these kinds of stocks. Once you learn how, you’ll never look at investing the same way again. And if you want my help, [just let me know](. Once you see it, you can’t unsee it. In this case, that’s a beautiful thing. Talk soon, [Jason Bodner]Jason Bodner Editor, Jason Bodner's Power Trends P.S. And just a reminder. Monday is Presidents’ Day, and the market and TradeSmith offices are closed. We’ll still have Monday’s Power Trends for you, though, and I hope you enjoy the holiday weekend! Get Instant Access Click to read these free reports and automatically sign up for research throughout the week. [How A.I. Investing Can Improve Your Portfolio]( [3 Stocks to Build Your Wealth in 2024]( [5 Unapologetically Profitable Stocks for 2024]( [Download now on the Apple Store]( [Get It On Google Play]( [866.385.2076](tel:+866-385-2076) | support@tradesmith.com ©2024 TradeSmith, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Protected by copyright laws of the United States and international treaties. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution (electronic or otherwise, including on the world wide web), in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited without the express written permission of TradeSmith, LLC. This work is based on SEC filings, current events, interviews, corporate press releases and what we’ve learned as researchers and writers. Our work may contain errors and should not be considered personalized investment advice. TradeSmith, LLC does not issue securities recommendations, and no discussion of a particular stock(s) should be interpreted as such. Past, simulated, and/or hypothetical performance of any strategy published by TradeSmith, LLC should not be interpreted as representational of future returns. You shouldn’t make any investment decision based solely on what you read here. It’s your money and your responsibility. TradeSmith P.O. Box 340087 Tampa, FL 33694 [Terms of Use]( [Privacy Policy]( To unsubscribe or change your email preferences, please [click here](. [tradesmith logo] This email was sent to: {EMAIL} This email was sent by: TradeSmith PO Box 3039, Spring Hill, FL, 34611, US We respect your right to privacy - [view our policy](

Marketing emails from tradestops.com

View More
Sent On

08/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

06/12/2024

Sent On

05/12/2024

Sent On

05/12/2024

Sent On

04/12/2024

Email Content Statistics

Subscribe Now

Subject Line Length

Data shows that subject lines with 6 to 10 words generated 21 percent higher open rate.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Words

The more words in the content, the more time the user will need to spend reading. Get straight to the point with catchy short phrases and interesting photos and graphics.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Number of Images

More images or large images might cause the email to load slower. Aim for a balance of words and images.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Time to Read

Longer reading time requires more attention and patience from users. Aim for short phrases and catchy keywords.

Subscribe Now

Average in this category

Subscribe Now

Predicted open rate

Subscribe Now

Spam Score

Spam score is determined by a large number of checks performed on the content of the email. For the best delivery results, it is advised to lower your spam score as much as possible.

Subscribe Now

Flesch reading score

Flesch reading score measures how complex a text is. The lower the score, the more difficult the text is to read. The Flesch readability score uses the average length of your sentences (measured by the number of words) and the average number of syllables per word in an equation to calculate the reading ease. Text with a very high Flesch reading ease score (about 100) is straightforward and easy to read, with short sentences and no words of more than two syllables. Usually, a reading ease score of 60-70 is considered acceptable/normal for web copy.

Subscribe Now

Technologies

What powers this email? Every email we receive is parsed to determine the sending ESP and any additional email technologies used.

Subscribe Now

Email Size (not include images)

Font Used

No. Font Name
Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2019–2025 SimilarMail.